Type A and B convince C

 

Hi, reread this one, comments inline.

Der Westen liegt im Abendland

Über die Grenzen von Religionsfreiheit und Religionskritik

…Die der­zeit vom po­li­ti­schen Main­stream ge­führ­ten De­bat­ten zum künf­ti­gen ge­sell­schaft­li­chen Um­gang mit dem Islam und sei­nen An­hän­gern ma­chen eines immer wie­der deut­lich: für Re­li­gi­ons­kri­tik im Sinne von Marx, Freud und Ador­no sind Linke – und das zu­se­hends ka­te­go­risch – nicht an­sprech­bar….

Judaisierung ist Zivilisierung

His­to­risch be­trach­tet sind die Her­aus­bil­dung einer bür­ger­li­chen Ge­sell­schafts­sphä­re und die Ent­ste­hung des phi­lo­so­phi­schen Mo­nis­mus sowie jü­di­schen Mo­no­the­is­mus in der grie­chi­schen An­ti­ke des 5. Jahr­hun­derts vor Chr. Phä­no­me­ne, deren gleich­zei­ti­ges Er­schei­nen alles an­de­re als kon­tin­gent ist. Vie­les spricht dafür, dass Letz­te­res sei­nen ma­te­ri­el­len Grund in Ers­te­rem hat. (6)

btw: The other thing is that there is just one zero, as Jewish Belief stemmed from atheist Buddhists + antislavery efforts, thus the missionary impuls btw
Die Er­fah­rung des geld­ver­mit­tel­ten Wa­ren­tauschs – dass also alle ein­zel­nen Wa­ren­din­ge, wel­che die Men­schen zu Schöp­fern haben, über ein Prin­zip, ein Eines, sei es Gold, Sil­ber oder Münz­geld, re­gu­liert wer­den und zir­ku­lie­ren – mag die Frage na­he­ge­legt haben, ob nicht ge­wis­ser­ma­ßen ana­log auch alle Na­tur­din­ge in­klu­si­ve des Men­schen auf ein Prin­zip rück­führ­bar sind, dem sie Exis­tenz und in­ne­ren Zu­sam­men­hang ver­dan­ken. In­mit­ten einer Welt po­lyt­he­is­ti­scher My­then kommt Aris­to­te­les so – rein geis­tes­ge­schicht­lich be­trach­tet – plötz­lich und un­ver­mit­telt phi­lo­so­phisch auf den einen selbst un­be­weg­ten Be­we­ger alles Sei­en­den und kom­men die Juden re­li­gi­ös auf den einen Schöp­fer­gott. Noch die spä­te­re christ­li­che Tri­ni­tät ist keine Auf­wei­chung des oder Ver­stoß gegen den Mo­no­the­is­mus, son­dern dürf­te ge­ra­de in ihrer Rät­sel­haf­tig­keit und Mys­tik ad­äqua­ter und plau­si­bler Aus­druck der ge­ahn­ten, aber un­be­grif­fe­nen Drei­heit in der Kon­sti­tu­ti­on des Tausch­werts (also Gott) sein: 1. Wert­abs­trak­ti­on (= Hei­li­ger Geist), 2. Tausch­recht set­zen­de und ho­heit­li­che Kon­trol­le über die Geld­wa­re aus­üben­de Sou­ve­rä­ni­tät (= Vater) und 3. die Münze selbst als sinn­lich ge­wor­de­ne Abs­trak­ti­on (= fleisch­ge­wor­de­ner Sohn, sinn­lich-über­sinn­li­ches Ding).So­weit der geld­ver­mit­tel­te Äqui­va­len­ten­tausch – die Ver­glei­chung des Un­glei­chen – nicht nur in­di­rekt den Er­fah­rungs­hin­ter­grund Aris­to­te­li­scher Über­le­gun­gen gibt, son­dern als sol­cher den Ge­gen­stand der Ana­ly­se bil­det, re­flek­tiert Aris­to­te­les auf die not­wen­di­ge recht­li­che Gleich­heit der Tau­schen­den als Tau­schen­de, also eine Gleich­heit, die als Ab­se­hung vom ge­sell­schaft­li­chen Rang der Per­so­nen zu­gleich aber auf den Tausch­akt selbst be­schränkt bleibt.
btw: cause the humans once understood that this formally needed slavery:(compare Epheser 6.6: but it was the mental slavery they would not stand)(one should further more warn that for human kind this monist believe is mentally sickening, dangerous for some unprepared without help ..,)
Dem­ge­gen­über bil­det das Ju­den­tum eine die un­mit­tel­ba­re Rea­li­tät des Äqui­va­len­ten­tauschs tran­szen­die­ren­de Idee her­aus. So wie das Geld (als Geld­wa­re oder Münze) im aus­wär­ti­gen Han­del im Grun­de ein uni­ver­sa­les Prin­zip der „Völ­ker­ver­stän­di­gung“ – im Un­ter­schied zum Raub­krieg – dar­stellt, fun­giert der jü­di­sche mo­no­the­is­tisch ge­dach­te Gott eben nicht mehr als par­ti­ku­la­rer Stam­mes­gott der Juden, son­dern als Gott aller Men­schen, vor dem und des­sen Ge­setz alle Men­schen prin­zi­pi­ell gleich sind, gleich­be­deu­tend mit der Idee einer un­ge­teil­ten Mensch­heit und der Got­tes­eben­bild­lich­keit jedes ein­zel­nen Men­schen, des­sen Leben darum hei­lig ist. So ver­wei­sen eben auch Ge­setz, Bund, Ver­trags­werk – ver­mit­telt über den Aus­zug der He­brä­er aus Ägyp­ten – immer auch auf einen grund­sätz­li­chen Ein­spruch gegen die In­sti­tu­ti­on der Skla­ve­rei, ja der Herr­schaft des Men­schen über den Men­schen über­haupt.Un­ab­hän­gig von den kon­kre­ten In­hal­ten des jü­di­schen Ge­set­zes, das in we­sent­li­chen Fra­gen spä­te­re bür­ger­li­che Rechts­grund­sät­ze der Mo­der­ne vor­weg­nimmt, ist das Ver­hält­nis zu Sou­ve­rä­ni­tät, Recht und Ord­nung in eine Theo­rie des Mes­sia­ni­schen ein­ge­las­sen, wo­durch es af­fir­ma­tiv und kri­tisch zu­gleich ist. Das Ge­setz ist ei­ner­seits als sol­ches und in sei­nen In­hal­ten Aus­druck des un­ver­söhn­ten Stan­des der Mensch­heit (mit sich selbst, Gott und der Natur) und ga­ran­tiert, quasi als Kom­pro­miss, das best­mög­li­che Leben ein­ge­denk eben jener all­ge­mei­nen Un­ver­söhnt­heit. Im ver­söhn­ten Stand da­ge­gen wäre das Ge­setz als ver­wirk­lich­tes, sei­nem Geist nach von den Men­schen ver­in­ner­lich­tes, als äu­ße­res und buch­stäb­li­ches über­flüs­sig be­zie­hungs­wei­se auf­ge­ho­ben.Nach die­sem Mus­ter üb­ri­gens denkt Marx die durch einen re­vo­lu­tio­nä­ren Akt her­zu­stel­len­de Über­gangs­ge­sell­schaft zwi­schen Ka­pi­ta­lis­mus und Kom­mu­nis­mus, in der unter neuen Ei­gen­tums­ver­hält­nis­sen, also auf der Basis ver­ge­sell­schaf­te­ter Pro­duk­ti­ons­mit­tel die bür­ger­li­che Rechts­form zu­nächst ge­nau­so fort­exis­tiert, wie die Pro­duk­te ver­mit­tels des geld­ähn­li­chen Ar­beits­gel­des dis­tri­bu­iert wer­den – bis Rechts-, Wa­ren- und Geld­form voll­ends über­flüs­sig ge­wor­den sind.
oops, Massmurder, double massmurder, honey pot for psychopaths, thus working place for guaranteed blood money
later add:
focus on the sentence, please:
While productivity rises to infinite the share of producers should tend to zero.
Yes? But what? Honestly,

I want answers.

And: Solve this first! Estimate the solving costs (gonna be huge, as the hegelist came to assist attacking it solution)! Solve it!
I mean, that is clear, if someone produced something and someone else tells him to keep almost a nothing, he is supposed to get dull. So, what? Are not there all kind of fierce animals out there to deal with? This reminds me, why have not someone asked him for an enlightenment?

who talks about late-capitatlism

Get me wrong, I did not want to keep on writing at this, to be deeply misunderstood. Well, this: My whole feeling and thinking goes that liberty enters when social fascism (do not even  know about the historic use though) is enlightened, in this high productivity era. Enlightened should be that the gross functional economy happens defined in two law areas, that symptomatically are hardly allowed, with high live risk for those involved. It is just here the source of violence in the world that beams back to the rest. Whereas the vast remaining law-economy areas fell in the triangle of “success religion”, “pseudoactivity” and “pseudomarket hold together be psychotechnics” (Adorno, Horkheimer), an illusory theater and ritual torture, the two framing areas, speech of, apart from doing framework lying efforts to the interior, while self-denying their benefit, do the whole functional work, by routing the life supply through its fragile channels. Those two mentioned are: 
1) pseudo marginalized:
http://www.cloeser.org/pub/Verwaltungsrecht_+_Verwaltungsprozessrecht_2/%C3%9Cbersicht%20Sozialrecht.pdf
“Soziale Hilfe (steuerfinanziert)”; these bolster the wages. (Healing I)
2)https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftskriminalit%C3%A4t#Typische_Delikte_(Auswahl)
 “ihr eigenes Rechtssystem”
While 1) does the current these do the load, by multiplying the money amount admitted by socialfascists to the necessary bubble amount. (Healing II). Do not know if Horkheimer tackled or just touched this truth with his teachings about a rackets in late capitalism, in a situation that is arguably not any more new to us.
So these working-class speeches of self labeled critics about deviants … got no space, right? Are rather what? A rationalization of a taboo they should enlighten instead of sustain it? Btw. Now catchy:
Who talks about late-capitatlism shall not keep silence about social-fascism.
That should be hopefully all by my side.
Wäh­rend das frühe Ur-Chris­ten­tum mit dem ers­ten Er­schei­nen Jesu die mes­sia­ni­sche Zeit für ge­kom­men
hielt und darum Hei­den mis­sio­nier­te und das jü­di­sche Ge­setz in sei­ner sa­kra­men­ta­len Ein­heit auf­ge­weicht weil für be­reits ver­wirk­licht er­klärt hatte, blieb dem spä­te­ren, ge­sell­schaft­lich sieg­rei­chen Chris­ten­tum an­ge­sichts der Pa­ru­sie­ver­zö­ge­rung – also: des of­fen­sicht­li­chen Aus­blei­bens des zwei­ten Er­schei­nens Jesu – und damit der doch nicht voll­kom­men er­lös­ten Welt nichts an­de­res übrig, als das Ge­setz in Form des Kir­chen­rechts wie­der auf­zu­rich­ten, das his­to­risch ver­mit­telt nun einen Syn­kre­tis­mus aus jü­di­schem und re­pu­bli­ka­nisch-rö­mi­schem Recht dar­stellt. Rein theo­lo­gisch mag es einen, sich dann in an­ti­jü­di­sches Res­sen­ti­ment über­set­zen­den, Min­der­wer­tig­keits­kom­plex ge­gen­über der Ur­sprungs­re­li­gi­on be­güns­ti­gen, aufs zwei­te Er­schei­nen des Mes­sias zu war­ten, statt wie das re­li­giö­se Ori­gi­nal aufs Erste – und damit die Be­deu­tung des Kreu­zes­to­des ab­zu­schwä­chen, gar in der Rechts­not­wen­dig­keit zu pro­fa­ni­sie­ren. Mensch­heits­his­to­risch ist es aber diese theo­lo­gi­sche Kon­struk­ti­on, die den Irr­tum der Na­her­war­tung des Heils kom­pen­siert, mit der das Chris­ten­tum zu­nächst die grie­chi­schen und rö­mi­schen Hei­den, dann die eu­ro­päi­schen Bar­ba­ren ju­da­i­sier­te, d.h. zi­vi­li­sier­te, wor­aus ein Res­sen­ti­ment­frei­heit er­mög­li­chen­des christ­li­ches Selbst­be­wusst­sein ge­gen­über den Juden hätte ge­zo­gen wer­den kön­nen.Es wird dann je­den­falls zur Iro­nie
There is no joke. There is a definitive breech (see Hegel quote this post he is definitely out)
in enlightenment idea history. Enlightenment was not anymore equal but unequal God. The ancient called this phenomenon well Anti-Christ, where Anti is “in place of”.You might datemark this with 28.10.1827. “Hegel ist hier.”, Gespräche mit Göthe.
On the other hand the word ironic is well chosen: Aph. Bilderbuch ohne Bilderbilder pointed out Enlightenment’s tenderness at its break through.
der spä­te­ren bür­ger­li­chen Re­vo­lu­tio­nen ge­hö­ren, dass sie gegen die Re­li­gi­on, die ka­tho­li­sche Kir­che, den Kle­rus (als Ver­bün­de­te des Adels) ins Werk ge­setzt wur­den und als Sä­ku­la­ri­sie­rung er­schei­nen, wäh­rend sie de facto das bis dahin im Schat­ten des welt­li­chen „eu­ro­pä­isch“-heid­ni­schen Ge­wohn­heits­rechts aus­ge­bil­de­te und prak­ti­zier­te ka­no­ni­sche Kir­chen­recht über­haupt erst prak­tisch als welt­li­ches, bür­ger­li­ches Recht in­thro­ni­sier­ten: die tausch­ver­mit­tel­te Gleich­heit aller Bür­ger vor dem Ge­setz, die Er­set­zung der auf das ius ta­lio­nis zu­rück­ge­hen­den Kör­per­stra­fen durch Be­stra­fung im Sinne des Äqui­va­lenz­prin­zips, die von der Tri­ni­täts­leh­re in­spi­rier­te Ge­wal­ten­tei­lung, Straf­mil­de­rung auf­grund von Ge­ständ­nis (sprich Beich­te) und Reue usw. usf.

Materialistische Kritik und Theologie

Wenn schon den Islam – und nicht erst den Is­la­mis­mus – kri­ti­sie­ren, dann doch bit­te­schön im Sinne der ma­te­ria­lis­ti­schen Re­li­gi­ons­kri­tik von Karl Marx, heißt es re­gel­mä­ßig von links, wobei die Re­fe­renz schon sys­te­ma­tisch auf plum­pen Athe­is­mus her­un­ter­ge­bracht wird. Marx da­ge­gen un­ter­schei­det in einem sei­ner bes­ten Texte – Zur Ju­den­fra­ge – die po­li­ti­sche von der mensch­li­chen Eman­zi­pa­ti­on. Gegen Bruno Bauer, der ver­tritt, dass die Juden sich vom Ju­den­tum eman­zi­pie­ren müss­ten, um voll­wer­ti­ge Staats­bür­ger zu wer­den, de­fi­niert Marx die po­li­ti­sche Eman­zi­pa­ti­on als Eman­zi­pa­ti­on des Staa­tes von der Re­li­gi­on, was die Ab­schaf­fung des Chris­ten­tums als Staats­re­li­gi­on und die De­gra­die­rung jeder Re­li­gi­on zur Pri­vat­schrul­le des ein­zel­nen Bür­gers meint,

womit Ju­den­tum und Chris­ten­tum dem bür­ger­li­chen Staat im mehr­fa­chen Wort­sinn gleich-gül­tig wer­den.

fine, did not know that thanks
later add: it’s clear that he went on to top of Hegel and that secondly politics need to obey to truth the same as private thing. So it is no wonder that he saw the Jewish and the Christian the same: from the heathenish point of view, which is, let have this clear, noway emancipation but deepest superstition.
Die Be­frei­ung des Ein­zel­nen von der Re­li­gi­on als Pri­vat­schrul­le bzw. der Ge­sell­schaft vom Ju­den­tum – eine gern als An­ti­se­mi­tis­mus miss­deu­te­te Wen­dung – ist erst Sache der mensch­li­chen Eman­zi­pa­ti­on.Ge­ra­de in die­sem Zu­sam­men­hang wäre je­doch klar­zu­stel­len, dass die gern
well then
later add: I should read what he could have said to my favor. I hear Horkheamer in the ear:
Marxism – Hegelean Poison = Nothing.
kol­por­tier­te Rede aus der Ein­lei­tung zur Kri­tik der He­gel­schen Rechts­phi­lo­so­phie, wo­nach die „Re­li­gi­ons­kri­tik“ Vor­aus­set­zung aller Kri­tik sei, man sich also von der „Re­li­gi­ons­kri­tik“ zur Kri­tik an Recht, Staat und Ka­pi­tal vor­zu­ar­bei­ten hätte, al­len­falls für die po­li­ti­sche Eman­zi­pa­ti­on zu­trifft; für die mensch­li­che Eman­zi­pa­ti­on gilt eher das Um­ge­kehr­te. Weil die Re­li­gi­on der „Seuf­zer der be­dräng­ten Krea­tur“, der „Trost trost­lo­ser Zu­stän­de“, die Il­lu­si­on über Ver­hält­nis­se, die der Il­lu­si­on be­dür­fen, zielt die Re­li­gi­ons­kri­tik als prak­ti­sche Kri­tik am Ka­pi­tal auf die Her­stel­lung einer Wirk­lich­keit, wel­che die Krea­tur nicht mehr be­drängt, und darum das Seuf­zen aus der Welt schafft. Eine athe­is­ti­sche Re­li­gi­ons­kri­tik da­ge­gen, wel­che die Re­li­gi­on als Blume an der Kette zer­pflückt, auf dass der Mensch seine Ver­skla­vung il­lu­si­ons­frei er­trü­ge, ist nach Marx Men­schen­ver­ach­tung, die mit Eman­zi­pa­ti­on nichts zu tun hat.
this catholic. Ok. Gott sei dank for him. It was the best text of him, you say?btw: A good definition for Menschenverachtung is it,
and suitably answering to the – most prominent – why of, is it? Somebody told me he read all_ the bible in koine speech, I am still not believing. At least it comes out he more christian than many… 
later add: protestant Sunday speeches once free from truth boundary. I sure that even Heidegger’s little girl held him for a “good guy” – without his approval. Catholic? I was rather searching for the link of Aleister Crowley’s Catholic Church.

Lucipher figure found: for the hounds and for the Mention-lichkeit

date
Sa 6. Okt 15:02:55 CEST 2018: So dare deriving from the reasons root -new- live and allow not other is prophecy. To bet on how the poor head for the heathenish, still too. – Sending them there, yet, bad. “Books for the hounds“: Marx knew that he could not prevent his publishings to be interpreted – falsely. The enlightenment tool out of this is the figure of lucipher, the fallen angel, prophet, grown bad prophet, grown bad at last at the hour of perception to the humans. The humans can measure their own badness, reflecting themselves in a scene where they pray to a the god, who comes out actually meeting the lucipher, myth, novella). – Marx publishing a novella staging? – I think it could need a reprise. (Novella request.) The writer(s) however living a common live among us, with human errors as few as a good deeds, can choose the style feature, and Marx, Engels appeared to bet on doing so the need too high to prevent. “When you pray to me as god, were best bet I had to be first degraded to Satan, well, then that was the word I release you.”,  he did not say, but would not be bad invented.

What happened in succession was, indeed, the unpreventable monadological split of people in one half, where they hold roots of reason for something to skip, and another half that fleeing a demon maintaining the inner of it, church, void from prophecy. 
So denkt auch Ador­no or­tho­dox mar­xis­tisch,
wenn er in der Ne­ga­ti­ven Dia­lek­tik ge­wis­ser­ma­ßen einen mes­sia­ni­schen Ma­te­ria­lis­mus be­grün­det:
late add: begründen: explain not found. Conceptionally the whole Christian materialism is to be found by Kants Human Dignity. Marx’s speculations on top of that brought at least no further contribution. This is more Adornos tactics to send the “idiots (Marxists) of the idiots” (Hegelists), an Aph., to the back to right path. My personal feel is that it is just the freedom from reason that attract these to Leftism, and they need nobody to explain it. Mainly. Surely I wrong, though.
„Mit der Theo­lo­gie kommt [der Ma­te­ria­lis­mus] dort über­ein, wo er am ma­te­ria­lis­tischs­ten ist. Seine Sehn­sucht wäre die Auf­er­ste­hung des Flei­sches […] Flucht­punkt des his­to­ri­schen Ma­te­ria­lis­mus wäre seine ei­ge­ne Auf­he­bung, die Be­frei­ung des Geis­tes vom Pri­mat der ma­te­ri­el­len Be­dürf­nis­se im Stand ihrer Er­fül­lung. Erst dem ge­still­ten leib­haf­ten Drang ver­söhn­te sich der Geist und würde, was er so­lan­ge nur ver­heißt, wie er im Bann der ma­te­ri­el­len Be­din­gun­gen die Be­frie­di­gung der ma­te­ri­el­len Be­dürf­nis­se ver­wei­gert.“ (7)
later add: hey lets add what Adorno (in Aph. Wishful thinking) found, and what pictures that not only the interface of a societal dialectics era such of a Hegel-Marx was broken ad both ends, but as well that of the clerical tradition in an eminent hair-raising, tricky way. If we look at above cite, we rather recognize straight (inconditional) basic income. But it was not Adorno who decreed it. It was decreed by Jesus in Matth. 5.3 first sentence sermon of the mountain, which can be seen as something Basic Law for Christians.
It contains the same thought, but under kind non-disclosure agreement since misleading translations of the original started to rule.
I did address that this was a critique at today’s basic income, namely its damn fascism not to grip its root (Matth 5.16-20), surely. But one might note that even Kant’s Human Dignity, that was another antecedent of the same, got foxed by this translation mistake, as he justified it Dignity thing by enemy love. Thing that is systematically close enough to our material freedom for god, but heroically secondary a source and it seems that he overlooked the primary source Matth. 5.3. Altogether arguably needless anti Jew fashioned the Matth. 5.43 choice, then, if this is of any matter, and that would be helped by your lately cross intent, late, and btw.
So this does not only break the author’s argument of a Christian “Abendland” society under the cross, arguably, but amplifies the view to reconcile the conflict of Christianity and Islam under the cross. In past and future. So you got to integrate one, two, three “splines”.
you wont see Kant in a line with Hegel, would you?
Ideo­lo­gie­kri­tik, deren Flucht­punkt immer, auch und ge­ra­de dann, wenn er – an­ge­sichts ver­stell­ter Pra­xis –nicht be­kennt­nis­haft vor sich her­ge­tra­gen wird,
well then, Horkheimer (and) in Game.
Adorno, too. Maybe those two combined, recently. Who knows? Horkheimer seemed a little slack, while Adorno a little sentimentally to strip the best from the rest of it ongoing economy. Surely the way to brave truth was that into the depth of the post’s bottle.
der Kom­mu­nis­mus dar­stellt, ist also Über­set­zung – wenn man will: sä­ku­la­ri­sie­ren­de Über­set­zung – des jü­disch-christ­li­chen Mes­sia­nis­mus; damit also ein Vor­ge­hen, das in sei­ner Sub­stanz abend­län­di­scher kaum sein könn­te.
to be humble: Fort-setzung (instalment), An-satz you say elsewhere

Menschenrechte als theologisches Naturrecht

Marx hat sei­ner­zeit die USA ins Spiel ge­bracht als das Land, das die po­li­ti­sche Eman­zi­pa­ti­on des Staa­tes von der Re­li­gi­on am fort­schritt­lichs­ten ver­wirk­licht habe. Dabei wäre etwas näher auf die „Ame­ri­ka­ni­sche Un­ab­hän­gig­keits­er­klä­rung“ ein­zu­ge­hen, weil diese in ihrer Prä­am­bel – und das ist ge­ra­de kein Wi­der­spruch – einen ex­pli­zi­ten theo­lo­gi­schen Bezug ent­hält, der zudem dop­pelt kon­sti­tu­tiv ist: ein­mal, und zwar all­ge­mein, fürs Selbst­ver­ständ­nis bür­ger­li­chen Rechts über­haupt und zum zwei­ten, im Be­son­de­ren, für den Ver­such, den Rechts­bruch des po­li­ti­schen Wi­der­stands gegen das Mut­ter­land mit dem Recht des Mut­ter­lan­des zu le­gi­ti­mie­ren, einem Recht al­ler­dings, vor dem sich das po­si­ti­ve Recht und des­sen Aus­le­gung in bei­den Na­tio­nen selbst zu recht­fer­ti­gen hat. Die ent­schei­den­den ers­ten Sätze der maß­geb­lich von Jef­fer­son ver­fass­ten Grün­dungs­ur­kun­de der USA vom 4. Juli 1776 gehen je­den­falls so:

Wir hal­ten diese Wahr­hei­ten für aus­ge­macht, dass alle Men­schen gleich er­schaf­fen wor­den, dass sie von ihrem Schöp­fer mit ge­wis­sen un­ver­äu­ßer­li­chen Rech­ten be­gabt wor­den sind, wor­un­ter sind Leben, Frei­heit und das Be­stre­ben nach Glück­se­lig­keit. Dass zur Ver­si­che­rung die­ser Rech­te Re­gie­run­gen unter den Men­schen ein­ge­führt wor­den sind, wel­che ihre ge­rech­te Ge­walt von der Ein­wil­li­gung der Re­gier­ten her­lei­ten; dass so­bald eine Re­gie­rungs­form die­sen End­zwe­cken ver­derb­lich wird, es das Recht des Volks ist, sie zu ver­än­dern oder ab­zu­schaf­fen, und eine neue Re­gie­rung ein­zu­set­zen, die auf sol­che Grund­sät­ze ge­grün­det, und deren Macht und Ge­walt sol­cher­ge­stalt ge­bil­det wird, als ihnen zur Er­hal­tung ihrer Si­cher­heit und Glück­se­lig­keit am schick­lichs­ten zu sein dün­ket.

Das Selbst­re­fle­xi­ons­ni­veau die­ser Set­zun­gen ist be­mer­kens­wert. Her­vor­zu­he­ben sind fol­gen­de Mo­men­te: Ers­tens: Es gibt so etwas wie un­ver­äu­ßer­li­che po­si­ti­ve Grund­rech­te, die allen Men­schen, als darin ein­an­der glei­chen In­di­vi­du­en, zu­kom­men: Leben, Frei­heit, Stre­ben nach Glück. Diese Rech­te stam­men von Gott. Zwei­tens: Da nun aber Gott selbst die ir­di­sche Ver­si­che­rung die­ser Rech­te nicht leis­tet, ist welt­li­che, also staat­li­che Ge­walt zu ihrer Durch­set­zung er­for­der­lich, was aufs Pa­ra­dox be­zie­hungs­wei­se die freund­li­che Il­lu­si­on der his­to­risch spä­ter de­kla­rier­ten „Men­schen­rech­te“ ver­weist – von Marx in der Ju­den­fra­ge, spä­ter pro­mi­nent noch ein­mal von Han­nah Arendt pro­ble­ma­ti­siert –, dass näm­lich die Grund­rech­te ei­ner­seits der Idee nach über bloße Bür­ger­rech­te hin­aus­ge­hen, weil sie für alle Men­schen un­ab­hän­gig von deren Staats­an­ge­hö­rig­keit gel­ten sol­len, an­de­rer­seits aber prak­tisch wert­los sind, wenn es kei­nen Sou­ve­rän gibt, der sich für zu­stän­dig er­klärt, wor­aus folgt: Wer Bür­ger­rech­te hat, braucht keine Men­schen­rech­te. Drit­tens: Zwar soll welt­li­che Ge­walt ihre Le­gi­ti­mi­tät von der Ein­wil­li­gung der Re­gier­ten be­zie­hen, doch hat das Wi­der­stands­recht dabei nichts mit einem for­mal ge­gen­läu­fi­gen Mehr­heits­wil­len be­zie­hungs­wei­se über­haupt Vol­un­ta­ris­mus zu tun, weil ein wi­der­stän­di­ger Volks­wil­le nur dann rechts­kon­form ist, wenn die Re­gie­rung sys­te­ma­tisch gegen die un­ver­äu­ßer­li­chen Grund­rech­te ver­stößt, was in­halts­in­dif­fe­ren­te Mehr­heits­dik­ta­tu­ren gegen Min­der­hei­ten recht­lich aus­schließt und sich darin eben ab­setzt von jedem for­ma­lis­ti­schen De­mo­kra­tie- und Wahl­rechts­ge­fa­sel. Vier­tens: Die Idee, dass po­si­ti­ves Recht selbst noch ein­mal recht­lich in einem hö­he­ren, ihm selbst sowie mensch­li­cher Will­kür tran­szen­den­ten, Recht ge­grün­det sein könn­te, oder zu grün­den wäre, ist recht alt und wurde un­term Be­griff des Na­tur­rechts ver­han­delt. Da sich so­zia­le Rech­te

What do you mean? Rights to social participation? The right of being part of the big business? Rather not, I mean. You should address the right to be free for God, and call it material right.

Social statement accumulation

A (thought of a) social statement shall always be able to justify itsself in front of epistemological, furthermore  judicial and political statements. If not it shall be disvalidated. A critique that does not shall be not seen as such, but as ideology. Thing that happens often enough in B-newspaper. There is huge accumulation of such unhindered misuse for centuries with an even that big effect of criminality. You find it well when you leave it all to thief by holding a material right for a social one and everybody is hurted so deeply, seismologically (MM) deep. But be certain, this is a thing you need to discover from the ground and confront if you hold the cross up – and not down – afresh and not “restaurated” (MM).

we should should check Hobbes’s unsuspected “social contracts” closely, and throw them out, if necessary; we shall start to throw out Hegel’s and Marx’s ‘decorous-heroic’ sociality the like when they reach out to grasp life rights till the day of today.

Holding the cross down: set the Islam to right

later add apropos “down”: Because here happens the original “setting to right” of Islam. Adorno coined this phrase once to understand rise of fascism and nazidom, and indeed runs risk to hold for a past time fascist by future ones.

It seems, however, that recognition of and thus the will to find a solution for a such “set to right” (jemanden ins Recht setzen) pattern is suckingly suppressed and finally blocked by early acusation of apology, which is therefore not scarcely seeded around. Out comes a regular “set to right”, guarded by kind a eternally hired, notorious both side of the barricade “vampires” –  among yous, say I. A measurable finding.

aber schwer­lich aus der Natur als sol­cher ab­lei­ten las­sen, be­zieht sich die theo­lo­gi­sche In­ter­pre­ta­ti­on eben auf Gott, der ja schließ­lich auch die Natur selbst ge­schaf­fen habe.Man könn­te nun na­tür­lich sagen, dass sich die Bür­ger mit­tels die­ser Kon­struk­ti­on Got­tes be­die­nen und die­sen zu­neh­mend als Platz­hal­ter und Bür­gen „bür­ger­li­cher Ver­nunft“ sä­ku­la­ri­sie­ren. An­de­rer­seits ist der jü­disch-christ­li­che Gott eben dies po­ten­ti­ell immer schon ge­we­sen, die Ver­bür­ger­li­chung der Mensch­heit – wie un­voll­kom­men und brü­chig auch immer – daher eben­so ihre Ju­da­i­sie­rung be­zie­hungs­wei­se Chris­tia­ni­sie­rung.
“immer schon”, yes? Thanks that saved me from a dozens comments. Btw. With Christianity heaven (“Parusie”) it is no other than a kinda set of math formulars. Surely each human being of a generation had to learn, reach to, them afresh. Couples of generations, too. No way around that and no guarantee neither. The ancients knew that first, secondly they were better in understanding them formulas than we. The “good news” was that they “formulas” were virtually at disposal.

Religionsfreiheit als protestantische Erfindung

Ent­fal­tet sich in der Aus­bil­dung des ka­no­ni­schen Kir­chen­rechts (schlag­wort­ar­tig aus­ge­drückt) eine his­to­ri­sche Dia­lek­tik von Ka­tho­li­zis­mus, Ju­den­tum und grie­chisch-rö­mi­scher An­ti­ke, so ent­sprin­gen die rechts­phi­lo­so­phi­schen Re­fle­xio­nen mo­der­ner Ver­fas­sungs­staa­ten dem ver­wi­ckel­ten Ver­hält­nis von Ka­tho­li­zis­mus und Pro­tes­tan­tis­mus. Als ver­folg­te Min­der­heit brach­ten vor ka­tho­li­scher Ver­fol­gung Schutz su­chen­de Pro­tes­tan­ten zum einen die grund­sätz­li­che Be­reit­schaft mit, sich dem welt­li­chen Recht sie schüt­zen­der Fürs­ten zu un­ter­wer­fen, was von ihnen ver­lang­te, die im Chris­ten­tum immer schon auch vor­han­de­ne Tren­nung von welt­li­cher Po­li­tik und Re­li­gi­on theo­lo­gisch wei­ter zu un­ter­mau­ern. Zum an­de­ren nei­gen sich von eta­blier­ten In­sti­tu­tio­nen her­aus­lö­sen­de Sek­ten häu­fig zu in­tern ver­gleichs­wei­se „de­mo­kra­ti­schen“ Struk­tu­ren, so dass ins­be­son­de­re pro­tes­tan­ti­sche Grup­pen, wo sie, wie in den USA zu den ers­ten ge­hör­ten, die po­li­ti­sche Ge­mein­we­sen auf­bau­ten, ihre quasi in­ne­re Bür­ger­lich­keit in die Po­li­tik über­tru­gen – ein Zu­sam­men­hang also, der dar­über hin­aus­geht, dass es sich bei den Ver­fas­sern der ame­ri­ka­ni­schen Un­ab­hän­gig­keits­er­klä­rung um gläu­bi­ge Pro­tes­tan­ten han­del­te sowie auch über die von Weber fest­ge­stell­te Kom­pa­ti­bi­li­tät von pro­tes­tan­ti­schen Glau­bens­in­hal­ten und ka­pi­ta­lis­ti­schen Im­pe­ra­ti­ven (Stich­wort: Ar­beits­ethos).

Darum ist ge­ra­de das be­son­de­re, po­si­ti­ve bür­ger­li­che Recht der Re­li­gi­ons­frei­heit – samt der ihm ver­bun­de­nen Idee re­li­giö­ser To­le­ranz – ge­nu­in pro­tes­tan­tisch. Im his­to­risch-po­li­ti­schen Ur­sprung war es ein Schutz­recht vor der ka­tho­li­schen Kir­che, war die To­le­ranz zu­vör­derst eine, die man kon­kur­rie­ren­den pro­tes­tan­ti­schen Sek­ten ge­währ­te. Auch wenn sich Re­li­gi­ons­frei­heit im bür­ger­li­chen Fort­gang immer wei­ter ver­all­ge­mei­ner­te, so hatte der Re­li­gi­onsbe­griff dabei selbst, also das, was über­haupt unter Re­li­gi­on zu ver­ste­hen war, stets eine pro­tes­tan­ti­sche Fär­bung: Re­li­gi­on als haupt­säch­lich Glau­be und in­ne­re Hal­tung, die sich nicht we­sent­lich in äu­ße­ren Hand­lun­gen voll­zieht, die mit bür­ger­li­chem Recht über­haupt kol­li­die­ren könn­ten. Und selbst von Ri­tu­al- und Ze­re­mo­nie-Re­li­gio­nen wie Ka­tho­li­zis­mus und Ju­den­tum konn­te an­ge­nom­men wer­den, dass Prak­ti­ken wie die Beich­te oder das Ein­hal­ten von Spei­se­ge­set­zen keine Her­aus­for­de­run­gen der welt­lich-bür­ger­li­chen Sou­ve­rä­ni­tät dar­stel­len. Das heißt: Pri­va­te Glau­bens­frei­heit, öf­fent­li­che Be­kennt­nis­frei­heit und pri­va­te wie öf­fent­li­che Re­li­gi­ons­aus­übungs­frei­heit sind ver­gleichs­wei­se un­pro­ble­ma­tisch in einem Pro­zess, der sich durch alle Wi­der­sprü­che und ge­sell­schaft­li­chen Kämp­fe hin­durch als Ver­bür­ger­li­chung der Re­li­gi­on oder Chris­tia­ni­sie­rung/Ju­da­i­sie­rung der Ge­sell­schaft be­schrei­ben lässt. (8) Darum hat es auch nie eine spe­zi­fisch re­li­gi­ös be­grün­de­te zur Pra­xis trei­ben­de jü­disch-christ­li­che Frau­en­ver­ach­tung ge­ge­ben, die im Namen der Re­li­gi­ons­frei­heit gegen die bür­ger­li­che Ge­sell­schaft durch­ge­setzt wer­den soll­te. In re­le­van­ten Be­rei­chen war die alte Kir­che nicht pa­tri­ar­cha­ler als die Ge­samt­ge­sell­schaft, um­fass­te die spä­te­re Über­win­dung des Pa­tri­ar­chats mehr oder we­ni­ger träge und rei­bungs­voll letzt­end­lich auch die abend­län­di­schen Re­li­gio­nen.

Daher ist es schon mehr als merk­wür­dig,

expectable “ironical”?
You really wonder(ed)? They do not obey any reasoning anymore and they are by far not only ones. Welcome to reality.
Now then, last sentence, you are right in trying to integrate the Islam in a materialist analysis such in order to solve a problem you got with it. I just said it in the previous post, them crazy Christians did not found to pay basic income 200 years ago, 1300 years and what is the worst  not even now.  And given this premise: Better the headscarf then tomorrow again lying under the gas shower, says your materialist analysis apparatus and you do not like what it is saying, bets I.
In front of this scenario how is it that you(s) do not bet still with the first single penny basic income? “How” this is the superior question? “Immer schon?” “Immer noch nicht”, I would rather say.
“How”? First bet: cause they cannot. As if axiomatically someone gave them job to beat around the bush of basic income.  Crazy. Crazy enough, to be picked up soon in one way or the other. Well, now, how to find and solve such craziness, these are the on top lying question, seems to me. Since ever. A 1300 year at least, Honestly.  “Hysterically.” Aph. Ausgrabung.
dass die An­ge­hö­ri­gen des Links­kar­tells dem is­la­mi­schen Pa­tri­ar­cha­lis­mus (der das alte abend­län­di­sche Pa­tri­ar­chat in den Schat­ten stellt), wo sie ihn nicht an­ti­ras­sis­tisch recht­fer­ti­gen, mit den abend­län­di­schen Be­grif­fen und Ideen von Re­li­gi­ons­frei­heit, Sä­ku­la­ris­mus und Lai­zi­tät be­geg­nen, und dass der ein­zi­ge ge­sell­schaft­lich wahr­nehm­ba­re bür­ger­li­che Wi­der­stand gegen die of­fen­kun­di­ge Is­la­mi­sie­rung von rechts for­mu­liert wird, wie auch die bes­ten Reden gegen den An­ti­se­mi­tis­mus sowie den Islam und für Is­ra­el im Deut­schen Bun­des­tag von Ver­tre­tern der AfD ge­hal­ten wer­den. (9) Das sowie in­ter­na­tio­nal der Wahl­er­folg und die Po­li­tik Trumps trei­ben denn auch die Links­an­ti­deut­schen unter den Freun­den Is­ra­els in eine haus­ge­mach­te Iden­ti­täts­kri­se, deren Haupt­sym­pto­me ihr hys­te­ri­sches En­ga­ge­ment gegen den „Rechts­po­pu­lis­mus“ und die de­nun­zia­to­risch ge­mein­te Eti­ket­tie­rung einer un­be­irrt Marx, Freud und Ador­no fol­gen­den und damit abend­län­di­schen Ideo­lo­gie­kri­tik als „rechts­an­ti­deutsch“ sind.Gegen die­sen Irr­sinn bleibt fest­zu­hal­ten, dass sich ohne de­zi­diert po­si­ti­ven Bezug aufs eben jü­disch-christ­lich kon­no­tier­te Abend­land kein Be­griff von Bür­ger­lich­keit den Selbst­zer­stö­rungs­ten­den­zen der nach­bür­ger­li­chen Ge­sell­schaft ent­ge­gen­set­zen lässt, ge­schwei­ge denn noch etwas ir­gend ver­nünf­tig Kom­mu­nis­ti­sches über­haupt nur in An­sät­zen ge­dacht wer­den könn­te.
“ver­nünf­tig Kom­mu­nis­ti­sches über­haupt nur in An­sät­zen ge­dacht”
What does want say with: t”o thing something communist in a reasonable way”. Is that not at most a contradictio in adjecto.  Yes. But Not Not so soon. Today was Markus 7.1-23 right? There they had the Jews debating in public on how common meant dirty (to them), once a while, every three years you know. And they had Jesus in front to put on top that it was of no good use but rather bad use to integrate into commons  by affording public bathes industries, kinda you know. Btw. I should have added this as well to the social thinking bashing a few paragraphs above the same.
To this one could add a whole, but I wont bother, beside that we got in German the same schism, mean means mean or mean, to say commons or queerly something bad. But I wondered this morning that this two terms wont fit together in our heads to a same root, right? To speak of something social, a preform of “gemein”, we are told to  think of some glorious and grateful, but not of a disposal, Veräußerung, that has gone the way of the food, piously spoken. Yes the gap remembers just the terrification of dullness in ours. So finding how not to think about a common- ism reasonably turns out to by eminently pious. Imho. That yes. He seems on the right track, eh?
Note: dirty in the sense: of “common sense” blurring the view by its early reification (Aph. 45 Wie scheint doch alles Werdende so krank.) to a “purely” held truth, Minima Moralia Aph. 20 Struwwelpeter, 145 Kunstfigur
 
Wenn die laut der po­li­ti­schen Klas­se aus der na­tio­nal­so­zia­lis­ti­schen Ori­en­ta­li­sie­rung des Abend­lan­des zu zie­hen­de Lehre darin be­ste­hen soll, ihre Wie­der­ho­lung im Zei­chen des Islam zu för­dern, dann ist es höchs­te Zeit, den Kreuz­zug zu füh­ren, der 1933 ver­säumt wurde.
Tho­mas Maul (Ba­ha­mas 79/2018)
er

 

Finally your Quiz

Well, then, I got somewhat hysterical. Doesnt  look good for an elderly Asozial. I shall thank God that he inspired me live the next day. And recognize no shame in “Lieber Gott verschon mein Haus, zünd andere an.” To say: Do not burn my asozial, take the Jews! While theres little doubt they are burning monstrously as hell, and was it not my asocial placed in front argually casual? Let hold together, if God admits! I should leave, however, but not without dropping a most important a contribution for your problem, by grasping a solution that you are probably not be able to grasp and that gonna be something  not to harm neither yous nor others. I could assume you would not listen to mine, but do not come up a 20 years later, I had not even tried it. So, well, I put it as title of post.

Well, then, lets lay out your problem:

You got normal Type A:

“Workers, lets terrorize the rest.” (Marx)

Type B:

“Lets hunt them evil Asozials.” (Hegel)

Type C:

“Lets cover the head of the beloved one woman that way that she believes herself not set out a ware alone.”

Now the arts work task for you boys:

Have Type A and Type B convince Type C not to do his!

Good Night.

ps: your are on the right way anyway, good luck, the way seems far to far, but that just measures how far it lately is.

 

 

B78 sorrows

Hello,

#About:

1 NO PASARÁN!.Das Elend der Einzelnen besteht in ihrer Entindividualisierung.

How is it? they talk them Muslim refugees about individuation and resistance -well they defined, what is “resilence” but not resistance, I bet they could not, it comes out of Kant’s “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten” in certain reflection to the Sermon of the mountain that btw, nor would – and they omit, that is they fail talking about the historical Jesus, that is the cultural Enlightenment program and manhood’s cultural Enlightenment roots 0, because of incapacity. A disparateness that leads into the comical:

der Liebling vom Gefängniswärter.das leben des brian.

S. Freud: Die “Rackets” haben uns am Leben gelassen, ohne dass wir es ihnen erlaubt hätten. (The “rackets” left us alive, without us havening allowed them to do so.)

S. Freud: Die Zukunft einer Illusion, GW V 275-380

date? date
Di 18. Dez 17:05:08 CET 2018, – oops? Might have been a little harsh? How about

the patches?

Hey, there are things  I read within yours doings, straight porno I see. Do not get me wrong! I could go helping you with that, lead you to a way of your healing, too, even, against your own will? Keep that! I would roll that out a little lengthily, thats true, and I bet that you would not get the last, after you got enough yet the first. – That says, not even the first of all, cause the was yet too much, eh? It is nothing, business as usual so to say, I provide you a couple of deals, a promise and an offers, or to say better a rows of them, and. And these? Yes, these are affairs from my own production, I quit pursuing, for one or the other reason, and to leave for disposal to: you, – that whats I am suggesting. See, how could I be ever untrue to you?

Or that is, you see: I could be untrue, but be  not badly invented here, right?

Everything however is valid in one certain aspect: the subjunctive of a grammatical institute. I narrowed you to be among its protectors, to hold another vast idea, foreword two.

To meet you here!

Well, you know. I was surprised. Did I say that? About the courage of yous to push your business field into refugee market, while counting business options I myself, you know, for what could not other to suitable to someelse eventually yous. First step in the pit and second: even for yous in case of such need, better to understand the narration flow. The latter is of importance, attention, the following is dense, I need hurry down to the matter, the material analysis so hold,  asap: as always. So keep tightened belts.

Yes, and do not get me wrong, I is not that I wise you  how not to do that, too, but better.

You will be lets deem gpl free of, so if not, you will be on your own devices. Yes, and I could tell you a ton of thing more, onto it, because, yes its taking smoothly out of my own production, but the entire one, while I am naturally wine on its outcarves. Shit happen’s, sad but true. But, no “just right”. (Joice) Uhh, everything said? No! Truth is rather that these cherries strive to you, bets I. “Nimm sie nur hin, sie fielen dir ja zu.” Kidding. Whats more? Well, then, deliver you three one, two, three odd chops from my production tree, you might not have dreamed of, and thats gonna be all, no tricks. It is really what you wont believe, I wish you all the best. You know I love you. hoo hoo hoo.

If you hold me that long time, you know, it is unavoidable that you got me grown with already the fourth of good tips for you and for your favor. I tell you: Now I, get me right. I think. Think monstrously virtually, fantasy kaspico? Fantasie. And Adorno. Adornophantasy and the phantasy of Adorno in Hans Guck in die Luft, the Aphorism, you know. You should service a novella of em, in days of today, aint you? So the forth of this wise tips set goes: Look the business structure is kind high risk. First. But it should not harm to perceive an idea neither, without any such execution. Secend, tenth, and thousandyears, right? Just assure that the such a unungemeine Kleinigkeit of lets say, ahem, Tepes, else Frontfussball, else Holocaust should have license of being mentioned. This security counter weight for realizing a prominent, but any way legally to be legal strategic position in a virtual, was ziest du mich in diese düstren gänge, I know you are not of those, of hinderering: The next such Ausschwitz. Still not forbidden such speech, please do not hunt me yet. Counter weight? Of the maximally assured, successful  manipulation of the next such event, aka the historical, periodical extinction of heathenish blood thurst, this time and from this time on hindered down to though impossible a cero. Everybody can be hold agreeing, said someone. Can be firewall effort of yous, to steal a seat among the clowns out whatsitname jutub, was it, where to hold a channel, well I advice you, not be unadvised anyway to do what you did never: to hold a naked body crucifix at each wall. 6. Not 6 Bretter und zwei, as you would I guess. Well, and then, hold, too, a another feature, the copy of Minima Moralia, too, at the focal wall, at screen. Ok? Nothing special. You are ready. Fine boy, from this, everybody, I will call you christ from day of today. I shall not taunt. Story private method of: You hi-jected one of the antifa, you could even take your selves, having him brought face on the ground to mumble: “Thank you Adolf Hitler, that made your holocaust, so much better than I would!”. Maybe you got to hold it german marx-heathen holidays industries gain, you will know better, folkloric bonus. And maybe, your out and through. And you got a being in touch, a measurement for further approaches of it next mom “such a unungemeine Kleinigkeit”, it is just: the work load is in reach. The next hard-coded feature is the proposal stage that would allow the user to drink, too, blood at it ritual like the catholics do, in wish of creating spectacle.  To cheap? Well, give it some extra; you could need a reputation stand from an LTS long time service till 2319, a Gottlieb features, streaming services, is it?

It is not good enough for me, so, but it is too good for you. I told you not to try, did I? Now? Still there? Back? Ok. It was not that heavy the fourth, third, the second and the first. Well the first is easy, I teach to strengthen you the Islam and Islamisation of our state right now, you would not follow me I knew, to notice myself having been true to you, because if not, why I fired alternative tip 2, that is follow Adorno on the same ground to fight individuation breakage back to late biographic age. To “stop”, “aufhören” with it. (Dialektik der Aufklärung) You will not get me, but could, and for to reach that materialist aware one‘s businesses goal you got a feature out of reach, that is take somebody’s forgotten keys and your out, hopefully. What do I say? Well, listen, I bet, the way there, goes through the well biggest, densest narcisist hindrance field, – to send a rat through: I could tell you what I hold surely too, even more embarrassing than film 4, <-komma, for you, listen -> which is precisely to be searched, where? My phenomenologics hold that the early desindiviation in western part, is to be groundly searched, did I say that?. From we will come to him again, Freud, S.: They hold a label “self produced heathens around their neck”, the Christians, so called dünnchristianisierten, superficially christiaizated, majority, and could not reply for hundred years. Adorno, however, teaches to improve New Testament lecture and translation, to? – in? to be applied where? Else than catholic priests practice and Bildung, that is limited, by applying in the catholic church, grounding on a materialist fundamentally convincing security “bet”, for regime change of priests self-destruction, which would be focused as a desindiviation front line area. Your reasons for it would be worse than the devil’s itself, I believe strongly. For that: told you not to. At least work load: Its not that big that book, for to own them. Moderate. And risk? No. – You got me railing. There is risk, not for you to be sufferable, but to hold or not to hold against you, while sending you off periodically. First. I should mock work load for a heathen user were infinite. I told you not be capable even for a better. Excuse me.

Well, feature to those most pitiable Atlas-Monads, would be to service them first least adequate appliers. Note here the healer ur-instance ask a the ur-police instance for another intent to turn living people to a God-fastened security regime, whereby the offer could be expected these days no other then ridiculous. Think of Don Quijote a moment. So why to wake them up to their ghost ship? And how? Now, the conflict stand, is when Jesus “throw over”, Matthew, Satans face in temple, which gives novella space from brawl to hanging to witness protection. On the one hand. Sure is that the missing mosaic – that is boxing the old priest, cause they are original addressed when selling God is thought of, nearly to death for a chance of a theoretical far nothing to gain: so: no go – is an arts figure to teach the security trade-off between both figures. This story focally, at least a little enough, centers in the year 40 after Christ. They reheathened definitely however till 500, with intentionally misunderstanding  and wrong teaching of gospel, till today, meanwhile came even the full-heathen Marx, worse than Aristoteles permits, dunno, to read and understand them the bible better than they themselves at around 1850. So what do you think I teaches now? Yes, damn, you got me once more. Naturally I would do no other then having come up with the monadic hegel-marx darts set feature. The aspirants previously accredit by taking part in “vilifying-ostentative Hegel or Marx Counterfeit darting gatherings”. Below such darts disk and Counterfeit could be written a nice quote of each of these heathenish thinkers. “Sie haben die Eh’ nicht zu arbeiten”, “Capitalists tremble for the work’s terror!”. Feature shall be hard-coded defaults.

Later add: As I see you crowding anyway, I needed pick up a future order feature to park em B-newspaper Adorno people straight backward into the clerus, hung into as an religious order, with the merits of caring for antisemitics. I would have got no success in hunting them there, thing that does not hinder yet the propagation of wrapper designs of such posthume growth together. A Bahamas Templos Catholicos, BTC was among the ten best suppliers in 2119, have you known?

Ok, you got me again, its Christmas, Holy Night, to adher the fifth child Production chop to it second tip, I found dramatically fitting, not bad. hm, and, bofh mode on, to bachilor you there I found some other chicane features useful, cause alternatively optional I would allow the user to assert the hegel quote’s to these days events of sponsored sorrowing. The bet, excuse me prayer, of it can be accredited valid historical material analysis in application beneath lets say the long term security future plan asked for. I thought well that this should be said right enough. We commemorate, before the first two blood havocs of our material world, partly or not yet that partly marxism and holocaust, mainly, anyway decent candidates, the event which to be thought as ground for the latter, the getting authoritative the ideology, a buggy material analysis, that is to be hold as definitive mother of em later daughter and grand daughter event. How that? It came in handy while tricking with kinda theological-mathematical integration, an art, and speculation. I will tell you – now. Listen? I tell you two things and we are out. Its about about our assumption of a undifferentiable, that is because in general case of random period length, sinus curve alternating binary to say -1, 1 heathen, non-heathen controlled world, over the time, the human history, to future and past, ok? Now, why flips state -1 to 1? Answer: when the reasonable hold material analysis preempts a hold against deficient one. The flip from 1, -1 came however silent according to the state of the art’s bets, when the a decent material analysis was not anymore regarded, because not hold by anyone a sad hour, in question indeed. Hm. But first fasten! Look this little quote finding allows us, to map the historical map around us with 1 or -1 options a indeed good deal. Look, its quite else nothing then to follow the easiest path, and we got through overwhelmingly. Then, imagine we are floating below a zero line, turning down, exponentially growing. “Tiefer und immer tiefer.” MM, Ok? – But, as we are not allowed to use the method not believing in god. Ergo we assume for the future a most merciless to any steadyness candidature a instant most blinking flip to 1. Yes, that is we are living in paradise and out of our might of that we can assure to keep growing and existing, that says hopefully not to be kicked out, lets assume we got delinquency freedom of apple cleptomany accredited once a chance.  So the hour zero of any thought solving, or salvation, can be predicted, and yet that far, we can identify the length of the shadowed minus period just commanded to stop, since the last time we measure reason, a signal: Göthe’s islam-aware material analysis. We shall watch out to what we soon step to leave ourself. Greatings signals to the upper world next generations of beloved greatgranchilds. Hi, too. Help tips between. They said that their art works needed to be shipped half to russia and second to america. Die Lehrjahre von Wilhelm Meister, last chapter. On the other hand we could narrow down a fragment to integrate, time between Goethe and now, precisely. And its precisely the decision to dive under, that calls attention, namely to correct it, and by it all later decisions infected, aka heal but from the root, and not without in vain and affecting a further future. Note! The change is little, and we are pushed on a way we liked anyway: The two first terrible events of heathenish bloodsports are objectively identified and gladly still saddened. Ausschwitz and the Marxisms deeds. Not one iota, says someone to change? go ahead! But to ask to assert another, a prior, inherent part, and: pious. To commemorate not only the bloody destruction, but to the prior moment of initially ghost destruction. And tick, tick, tick the solution key, rotates three, and who knows with gods help, clemency, anyway will a the lock to paradise opens for a user – or his beloved. Listen, I cannot restrict the dear god from giving presents, just because I found it feature cleaner.

An other sorrying-feature, bleeding edge feature, help us to get in touch with a virulent problem but turned to but to the bleeding edge of development of a now in the sponsored sorrowing series, once enlightened the affect of a couple of recent attacks, murders, about the SGB2, a field of administrative judicature directly connected with Holocaust, never soothed, till day of today, and spoken free even in Nuremberg them actors. (afaik mainly) – There is even so a big gain for humanity, to say a decent opportunity, confronting each others by hitting, debating on paper, knows I, which is law, a text, virtual a field!

So yes, this was the brigde-arts figure. Out of it you got a diagnosis of an error accumulation populate or grow from one of 6 to 7 generations (days) to now. Where by at this we call it soon schizzofrenic or monadic a propagation since then, soon its own best sickness healing history, we are set out to find our contemporaries and above all more tooling: suiting the language body, a feature. “Gold gemünzt und ungemünzt” was true. After swining to the clockwork enough, we got a two zones language body, one enlightened period’s part and one shadowed, more and more infecting. The wording of the shadowed zone is not other bad then needing still further development. As a start a bonum is not bad: its wording is suitable for negative a world view, for a detective story still. But even at its home field it shows deficiencies against its enlightened counter parts, in positive narration field it gots a complete fall out. We could speculate healing our historic wounds comes down to heal the bad narration of a last century with, our own production, that of Goethe and that of its own corpse not to underestimate or even to -throw away? You would not. Ah, I forgot, in need for bad narration asking for healingstart mining the SGBII, from second sentence on! Till? A vast bet: nullification of the rest and your are smarter and the world another one.

For to demonstrate the certainity the quote (“Ehr'” dunno) a decent parameter to demonstrate a wrong material analysis devasting, its just enough to wait it fall out of a stack when narrowing down what is meaningless and no other thought than from the beginning on satanicly mumble. A thing that is however just enough to preempt the paradigma of Göthe’s material analysis first and secondly can be captured in attitude of far from searching theoretical truth. Contradictio in adjecto, is just enough. You will note it comes even emotionally pushing, just tick, tick, tick and you are through with plant 5 and paradise awaiting you. So? The argument of it sentence is mainly supported by a figure that assume that there were a honor of a work thing to estimate. The insultingly harsh measured opposite of it comes out: The work, the service contract, is sold live time, in most indicated meanings meant to be not free from personal economic pressure, even high live risk pressure to note, as sold sold as in any kind of time, and ghost activity of the worker, and it is a fall through signal in paradise garden strong enough to be not just proud upon at least in competition with his no working opponent in lets have a honor candidature in question. Lately this man painted a naive world of a market, that demonstrates itself to the human that just as an interface for a full day participant to get structurally enough for his family out of a axiomatic condition. From here, however, to have it all fall, its enough to demonstrate that this is not timelessly valid. Things that comes near to the picture of being right satanicly driven, not just dis-honorful. In a possible future, when a consumers production could be done entirely, lets hold nearly, but by nobody human, then the virus’ justice’s focus would gravitate to: do not supply not any one from the minute of now! Btw, the death of humanity among other pecularities to note, this is, and yes to be hold out for to weigh a justice’s system a virus in a though still possible human history. qed.

Third: Fasten belts, you are used too it, right? -The film I had 34?- Third is plain. To sent a rat into a old-established you materialist aware one’s ghost train business, such as in a common whoopee park. And nothing. The feature is the name: It say: “Tod durch Arbeit.”

You were stabilized against any social pressure, while you find amazedly, that can sublime – as the after material analysis – to be the best “geistige Beschäftigung” -thinkable? According to the state of art of novella-ing. I teach going down on this week’s gospel, periscope, and nothing you would already guess mine, I fear. You, know, we are passing late Lucas, when by John, beheaded baptist, Jesus antecessor, for to stop into “human victims a invalid bet” by the forelast signal, (to be precise it is in deed to “think of” real last, as Jesus went to witness protection so to say): Our winning points will struggle with military and with fiscal intelligence service tantalizingly little. – To make (still the forelast time death-) sure that our might in virtual space is to us cheap and sufficient. They set their bets on god’s might, but you should because wont name a god at choosing in what is right, right? Are they synonymous, a little enough. He says state affairs, addressed here still, are solved that way that solve our  whole material conflict in the realm of Rechtsstaat, constitutional state, am I wrong? Now, you know the taunt, good boy go home, mom a moment, yet back? What does this mean on microscope, pls? I tell you why: Cause the feature figure of whopee guest processing through real obscene workers goes straight? Rechtsstaat it.  You could -dont need- label the costumer Rechtsstaat to give him a shower. You. Are. By no means unfree to open a such store at any street, at any street of jobcenter, too.

Workers? We are looking just in Ausschwitz throat, first to note, the risk plus importance. The trajectory between Rechtsstaat to next Ausschwitz, both cross and crossed, both indicative and subjunctive, crossed the field of traditional and nowadays so called Social Law. To get in touch, enlightened anybody, about the still immense heat even after the shift to Rechtsstaat, that is from emotionality to reason, whole a lot on the way. The workers of it “auto”: they are labelled, they are all too smart: Social Law Lawyer, might be the Count himself even, even his guest, Jonathan Harker, and ehm, you know for sex appeal, you got maybe better females the actors of both social judge figure and the attacker figure the jobcenter lawyer.

And, hey, we could, should criticize the SGB promotion practice these days, a game in which the main customer helper, the dracula figure indeed, refuses to service out of the seat the costumer after service, if out of possibility to be hindered by an eventual third colleague, in a blinking lights vamp theater, that is obscene enough a reality show to be get a real attended “design scare” in historical arena of a world as this one. A broad, awake attention to the topic’s but oh so well known sneaking paths shall be sold as constructive first, get me!

Mainly its over, is it? One, two, three, four. I should come later to complete the essentials, but that will be even though a fraction of the whole pattern, for example about what passes your world as the mirror that gives not image, its name is integration, a theological and mathematically water prove instrument, that is where it start. That of Angela Merkel, is it? Legit. Everything bundled for your favor, you see I love you. Last word by now. Till tomorrow. Take care for yourselves! Cherries and what? before the wolves? No, I do not bet that.

No, not, it is me again, I came back to tell you: young must you go!, why again you should not get use any of these products. You could keep reading ten kilometers still all the same roller coaster predefined looping dense, but to say good bye early I leave you with the “use case group design restriction” in the license. It says to not use, if you got among yous persons laying behind a hole in the wall. Wall? Yes, wall, an alexandrinean library wall to suffice. It were just to overlook you, all, laying there, without getting even help from each others. I decipher you a 100% per cent wall lying ones and you should be straight 0% tomorrow pls. You could me never stop mock else. So then see you soon, and we are, should have been then grown to the double persons number. ? Yes, cause then each brought his own’s delinquent’s IC-nurse. It is just a must to having contemplated one’s own person’s a Don Quijote type patient says the result. So then bye.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, the bug in it view, kicking off the ladder at roof so to say, having jumped up the stairmoving so to say, is to see it comically at all. Sermon of the mountain sentence 1-3 says rather to pass sorrow 2 to reach the tool 3, lowliness, to reach the aim 1. Now register, that in the film the positivist adviser could indeed reach to name 3 the tool, but should definitely run into shut up as far as aim 1 is concerned: he names 1a it well but fails meaning it 1b drastically. Nowadays positivists (check Aph. 79-82 Minima Moralia) would not get that far – in the many dimensions given here. Certainly(s) he could not gain stage 1b, too, but because of even (definitely no joke in contrast to the film) lack of stage 0.

Btw: So both bethinking god, kind a individuation an idea, a freedom from superstition, in particular Marxist Aristotelean superstitiousness, the first who can help, is him patient to him psychologist, the Muslim helps the Marxist essentially, and therefore with certain right can claim merits, if this was question/true.

By that check the “dragnet search success” of a comfortable degradation phenomenon -is it something different than differentiation an integration tool: a de-gradation a naming and mentioning?- in Disruption und Zivilgesellschaft, that should point to a tool 3.

A word to the “Disruption” asked for.

Disruption to note 1 and 2

 date
Mi 5. Dez 17:35:22 CET 2018
We measure the fragmentation of the world of heathens, that is humans not equipped with material analysis, or the say enlightenment. As far as I count till now, I row them to two cognitive disruption effects: a) ignorance of being a there a money gap, a soon whole life income of a taxation error on a person. They forget a million allways. “Zauberlehrling effect” deciphers one: the working transfer money recipients, shall get twice than what a non transfer money receiver shall get happening withing transfer money state

and yes the new “60% of existence minimum 3 year” from Angela Merkel regime, you know what mean, the so called ahm ä “sozialwidrig” per ongoing strike is sure effect of dealing with such a disruption equivocation. The income he have is then shortened. Human Dignity Knock-Out-Tricks as these. Yet a over all obscene “beat my poet, beat my thinker” scene praying to a pseudoactivity (Adorno) system, to, -its embarrassing to say this in the year 2019 not because of the people but because of technical stand – while wining in need to fake control over a higher scale industrial state. Pity and a security warning. Says the Bug: society not any more capable for industries. I dont knows, is that an internet article? Is this the end of societal democracy as we know it? What did these 500 dunno claqueurs MdB wanted express ELSE: signaling we want to stop servicing next anyway. Bye, bye democracy, then? You might know better, I bet. I bet, it costs more claqueurs to take it 60% thing back, presicely the excuse ritual thought off was too expensive. Nearly at least. Might I wrong to push it back 60% thing back to the underground here, first minute I found awareness? Probably too soon. – Now, please tell me, the bet that the monetary effort of commanding the 500 to switch the 60% on is lets say the seventh part of commanding the 60% back again. Is it a fair bet or is it a naive bet? Novella Request. You know what I means, the news is, you would not like it so bye, the news is the Hartz 4 was a big success. Point. In one aspect. That was after the first year banished to never, though. Point two. “Ich-AG“, so called “I stock cooporation” brand,  was its name, not beloved to even not so low wage market competition. Boom. Banished. Definitely they stopped helping people. “Hoppla.” That was the initial hit of a kind of hits onto the system, kind of which  the 60% is a critical yet. Says we have been suffering to a bad since this day. Its not just discrimination, it is discrimating reason itself, the dear God and if you want Gothes Bildung, lets not fail to denote that on a theological agenda. Note who wants to fight with whom. They fight it like with rat poison, hardly nobody is able of thinking still, especially  “if professionally”, Aph. 80, Minima Moralia. How destructive is this? Which animal eats its brain first? Eeh. And too tell you the truth, it feels like if it suffices that to tell somebody a fake business and you are mainly dead, or 60% so to say. Murder, a word, of the entrepreneur, waned the big capitalist, the: father.  Uhu. The magnetic needle is just pole twisted. A proud bad dull barbarian desperate and as such irresponsable slap on the father, to literally any random cost, and havoc. Fear the witches dancing around that it were all for “fathers” fault tomorrow. As I said, there is a geistig thing on the balance, maybe not so unpriced to note, and to by owned, by them, and to be sold, to the dogs, by them, in the instance, not to forget yous urged to help them between, pressured you to give in to a solution of “ideological integration”, to pressure you hold a definitive torture for a common work – Hey. Hurra, me not. No, no! Wrong enemy. They are doomed. This says the structure is kind a inverse_ If they had assured the case group the 60% on top, – not under! -, the world seemed still in order. And to reconcile it porcelaine it all, we can hope, I find, because they wait in pole position to explain their anyway purposeful though anyway true mistake to the people. After? Landing prophetically juridically disqualified.  Am I wrong to deem -hardly- nobody could takes these 60%-thing for serious ever, hoo?  Now, Aph. 151.10 cases can be patches with Matthew 5.13.2. (“hutos gar edioxan tus profetas tus pro hümon”, says: the trans-temporary forces are “in fiera y disigual batalla”.) Besides, the metaphor of gods garden eden finds its definitive vermin fucked out, a self understood (gardening) condition, as an ordinary labor, once a while, aufklären, in a head line paragraph, axiomatically, simple.

God be with you!

and b) shall be the equivocation then of the german polish boarderline, that there were a convention that separated into two the occasional humans on land, that on the one side they ought to get something like lets say precisely around the double of what the other-siders get.

Well, patch, I said there were mentionings at blackout event, they keep happening first in a ignoration phase. Then the individual when facing these taboo stress in front of a blackout erupting ideology starts the hopefully successful life long learning from any random default opinion to the decent teaching about the occasional justice bets (of them recent and due mentionings at black out time to get dominion over and reasonable handling with. Cause even though the any insight comes with terror shock, it might be its usefulness that urges. They, bets, are. Listen: just is to vote a) as b) for the richers. To note. Chimpansees as humans would not vote neither a) nor b) a just situation, that is another truth, that they are right at it. Do not get wrong! That says as long a human is not compatible with transfer money for all people on earth he suffers hallucinations, or black out, disruption, is to say attacked by those. Well we float through herds of so defined selbstverschuldete Unmündigkeit, that nasty, and overcome when a the first occasional bet hit is registering on the just side of justice bets, and to overcome, no? And the patch, however hopefully, succeeds when a last one gave desicive  impulse into  effectiveness.- I humbly, rather bets.

But: Good Luck!

I posed otherwhere head ache to read such a circular system  what I mean with dragnet success. And by that I got indication, that the terror of mistaking, the need of “snapping” to the consistent, such as in Aph. “Organum novissimum” is partly reflected to them. “Journalists”. Which is subjectively seen, ok.

So completing the picture there is given objective urge, to say dialectic opportunity: There is materialist disruption, true, now: behind an iron curtain, disruptively steep to a NOT A SINGLE PENNY TRANSFER MONEY ZONE a mentality. (I addressed in the other post).

between Borgia Missioning: Just like Jesus, not yet Hitler – an Aphorism

Now the question comes up: who exactly did not got that single penny. Somebody as Jesus, qed, to teach the anti-heathenish system behind it once. It has really very little to do with believe. In contrast with his monist supply deprivers, aka murderers, this thinking scheme is mostly the definitive opposite of a their superstitious believe. It is the pure reason that overcomes the latter, defiant by choice of its arts figure.  There has been a time, when people understood it key like that: Enlightenment. We all should agree in how sad is, how little has left of it all within this specific situation in and surely around Poland 2018.

Reason to orc out, none.

Reason to stand up for amend, the more, however.

But: you_ wanna be leftist, who you are, got disrupting ideosyncrasies in the arms of these Polish anti-abortionists ladies, bets I. I could just bring to light, that objectively seen that is not all strong a reason given the importance of the causa, observed at the materialist level. So: you could be nice to them, could not you? 1 Pence and another one.

Cripplemindware Novella Request

Besides the geopolitics one founds in this society report the socii cripplewaring as ever, but at the present productivity level reaching to new levels of societal mendacity that turns yet to open truth despise an idiocy in times of -leftist- whats the word, ah vampi.. postmodernism. Nothing to wonder “for” the Marxist, neither, finds I. But – I remembered a film scene I saw in my youth time occasionally in TV, when I thought on how them persecutors of Christians did make us Asocials lie even the same and or the more in an upcoming future. So to confront a news terrification with some novellaing efforts, I would like to propose the gaming of the following scene, Kind a “Schnitzlers Reigen“, Minima Moralia, scaling deliberately the Enlightenment level of each character, to get into touch with the topic in a wholesome way, no? You saw a chamber, part of family in anxiety praying, the mother, grandmother and daughter, behind the door in the other chamber you had the beating father with a stick at hand and the son yelling aua, aua, whole time long. Just with the detail, that the son, was sitting in the corner and father beating on the bed. So lets interest in the enlightenment space, in the hows and whys of any constellation, societal mendacity. But at the whole upsetness, I however insisted on the first estimation of a boy choosing to stop lying the dominant pattern.

Now, what would be now the main problem for yous when you better? You see?

As last sentence a let me note this: card carrying Nowadays Christians even Catholics often enough run in to the same trap as Marxist, kinda fallen into the same idolatry once: Infection of “Hegelean poison” (Horkheimer about the Marxism) they got measurably enough indeed. Are not there these for combating idolatry? They are virtually down at the moment. (a finding) If you point them to scrap their Hegelean poison out, they start gabbling about against a communists first or second as such, e.g. when they label themselves leftists, as it were a predicate. Try it out! I googled “linke katholiken” and? http://www.katholisch.de/aktuelles/aktuelle-artikel/alt-right-auf-katholisch here kinda within an disintegration conflict they snap to it. qed. They are proud to be mainstream heathens.

date
Mi 5. Dez 15:49:29 CET 2018

logs from the missals bot: Luke 16. I mean. The plant is given on top of the third year another year to be fruitful, they say. These kind delinquents trees reminds me humbly to the nowdays self-labeling leftist catholics, as find they no way to reintegrate into Ghost, a long lets say with betting of a Göthe time span of a round 200 years, 6 long biograhical live spans, were the ideologies ruled them, as yet to be bet one of the unlocked. What a heavy, heavy and horrific pressure of ours, to care for better sooner than later the ancients, and we, well not without a greater scale. In the art figure the view is steered to enlighten timely accumulative effects of ideologies, it damage potential, to say Schaden, as what ancients found as demonization.

Remember: a year of four years might be reasonable for a human to wait to “learn”, as to compare how they pissed entire 6 generations, man. Which were then by these measure not any more reasonable to wait for, cause the died all before learning nothing, 6 generation well. Another thing As to choose an Aph. of this I would take “Pseudomendos” and what he thought about the english. I would tackle him that he is wrong, because came out toutologically with characterization “blöd-böse” Ausschitz helpers. The could not hinder cause they found not the words, simply. Pretty much the same how he Adorno had no words to decipher the problem rightly,  had hard work at least, a “Sysiphuswork”. Now the problem is descriptable with a Luke 16, that the english and the earth had since 6 Generation of humans not anymore any pseudepigraphs in there rows at all, spirit, spirituality is dying out. And yes, I believe it very well if they had been 1933, they yet had taken the nazis the keys at the hour of locking open a such kz, a such any institute. They had probably hindered Auschwitz with ease, as true as that without their such contribution the doom was cheap.

.. and facing the doom of the tree, that is indeed useful to imagine. To unlocked and lost to die out, as something not belonging to the plant stem, – which in the example scheme at least were yet demonstrated by any meanwhile fruityness or “signs of live”, integrability in to the stem of a the ghost in retroperspective. Adorno Minima Moralia, in einem Aphorismus über Geist-Pflanzen nach Bergman: Die Gegenwart verändert ja die Vergangenheit. One is failing to assert oneself as connected to the stem, the tradierte God previously enlightened, kinda identified, since 6 generations says I? How that? And how out of that ideology or Aberglaube or what is it a malign virus that lets prettily demonstrate in the next chapter. I mean a foreword: this it that fancy, a monadology soon overwhelming is it yet, take care. It is a story of a human history, in which Karl Marx Pope. Lonely and only heredor of Godish Tradition on earth, well lost, too. He alone that lost, by time hated them contemporaries for it, called them dogs dunno. Altogether compared with todayshuman or even one of his time he was that vorbildlich, that easily nobody passed, so that we are left as his monads. Monads, yes, because he, compared with a human of a more enlightened measured epoque lets say at betwee Göthes or Jesus, was not anymore capable illness healer, but degraded to be best gate keeper of the heathenly infected and thus to be garded. The ever growing delightenment found in the time of marx and in his person a valve,in order to and since when we find ourselves right now with an ideological pattern stamped. We are Marx monads, thats the news of today. But -?. Have you imagined that ones. There are two marx monads about. I shall have counted them, lets say 101 and 102. Marx was pope said I, ok. Why? Because he read and understood the bible, and in that he was pretty unique on earth. But we come to that and will try to maintain it short.

What that helps the catholics today?  It must be a solution for nowadays humans that not anyway tried to not include the Islam, right? It will. Since and thanks to the Islam-aware, Tepes-aware, first historically aware pseudepigaphic engagements of a Göthes within his novella politics and strategically important placements in the bookshelves of historic arts: his factual novella production itself. He might be forbidden today, thats true, but luckily that can not affect us that much, as we could comforatably enough link back into his work, piously in front of a shelter that has authority. That to note. Yes, what is true, that one need to have read his novella once to acknowledge situated. No occultism o any. Read it first,

goes the one command.

not to war without an end.

who said it, btw, tell you the secret of today? It’s true.

So where did I stop? I said there were two kinds of marxist label monads. Legit marxist monads, Type A and monads of spurious marxism, Type B. The former are the catholics, who adopted the marxist bible reading en toto, but due to marx’s and another’s limitation of material analysis, it is not missing, but the fehlerhafte materielle analyse as called so elsewhere in this blog – just that what Cervantes had to do with the Aristotelean Metaphysik – is a mistake. They are those who failed not in addressing the Metaphysic at all, Type A, but who failed in using it properly Type B. A infection of a spirit illness that catapults them as said down onto a enlightenment of heathenish, prehistorical level. I can demonstrate that. Soon ..

So lets imagine, a Type A and B agree upon, to interpret the economy a bloody circus. And they are objectively true. But only B would fight against it unconditionally, which is just from B, but were not just from A, who would use Marx rather to disrespect the bible, but in no way  to find to by a way into it. Well now it comes, fasten belts: They both agree false on the question: What method to choose to get out of it. Both, or lets say the three A,B, Marx would option to empower what we might call the gladiators trade union. Objective the moment when you saw the walk along helping the wrong side, due to their recognition limitations, Ideology, Aberglaube, specified lately since between Cervantes and Aristoteles but not them. Attend them friendly firing against God till day of today that way, please. So concluding Luke 16 the being locked out from God, may or may not be healed, while being assured that the length of absence not in years but yet centuries measured is not a boost, but rather the contrary. It is to note, that even growing from 4 to 400 years the hope is not excluded, but confronted as such pre-accidentally. How would that help the catholics, one would further ask. Namely in omitting the damage to god that rises from there ignorance, the elevate to such level not be distinguish to such, the flows out of ordinary Persecution of Christians, incidencially happening among the As next. When? How? At the hour of not gardening the actual, contemporary, zarte plants of  pseudepigraphy. They would consider these phenoma as happening to a national economic branch, book selling not Mr. God himself. So he would not give it all to God, but rather him, God, what a book economic branch corresponds to. The dreadful under supply of their fault is just as terrific as ordinary persecution of Christian is, not to be named: help for the pseudepigraphy to overcome a certain, installed by Göthe, first initial hurdle. That is namely not without to self assert in front of an Islam and not to die out at the cause of vast underequipment. That would be when: the instanciated novella-ation could dissolve prastabilierte harmony. So as a matter of fact I could propose a measurement for nowadays monads betting, in how far a individual is objectively helpful for a revival of a decent novella-ing. To have a raw deem on a persons non-monadicness: having have it forbidden, is similar thing to help it happen? No, help reality is, indicative, far from that now. But that was just what I need to conclude the demonstrating.

The objective early treating on his plants, however, is trickily, but not impossibly to be interpreted as an organizational effort on his late behalf. This my tip of an integration arts is the patch for the locked of today, to be opened again tomorrow once enlightening the Aberglaube targeted. I wish so.

The chemical question, however for the sake of completeness, if the marxists monads both are split from another monad already there, must be affirmed. What Freud found word for is true: They stem from, that is they splitted of out of the monad of  historically grown anyway, “superficially christianized Heathen“, a dominant figure around in the age of so called secularization and still terrible today, that is true. I guess Hegelish occultism (Aph. 151) is their gate keeping Satan. The common sense would have searched a such Type 0 in the political spheres of modern liberalism in 1900 maybe, says I, to hold an idea. And it is by no means sure, that this figure is lets say by a 1950 yet dominant in the sphere of what them self labelled christiano-conservative, to give a house number, as I speak from my country as it were the whole world a moment. I have nothing said about the volumes of these abc categories, all four would hopefully agree that they are misleading, namely into a forbidden kind of bets on inter-monadic volume flows.

Out of materialist observation, the missals’ “2018 Luke 16”, we got how ever, above all and first of all, the truth of these poor 3 other kinds observers by standing, altogether four are we, how, why and if to supply the need of (adopt) these to be herded and btw. healed till healed. A Feature to note.

 

To be awaited soon…

Is not that sad?0

How them anti-racists had not checked a melange anti-racism, yet?

to understand this whole argument lets address another point http://redaktion-bahamas.org/artikel/2018/79-der-westen-liegt-im-abendland/

says to hold the maxim, Adorno’s small one, to do everything not to have Auschwitz happening again. But on the other hand, to explain the conflicts fulcrum, imho, Adorno found that a “melange”-antiracism (an Aph. MM,) leads just there: to “concentration camps”. So in case if the thinking gots frozen, unsupprisingly among the threats evoked, that is being both accused and affected by both racism and concentration camping, we can resume: if we want to intervene the next concentration camping, we should have strength to stop those who got no other than to support a such KZ-melange-antirassim, an ideology, that “someones” would find “so” “suitable”.

Aph. 60 “Ein Wort für die Moral”  is another prophecy for a concentration camp doer and hinderer expected to be mixed up within upcoming ideology. Not Bad, Theo, means I: Jesus and “Hitler”. So first before having clear, from my humble seat, who is culprit and who not, lets feel selbstverschuldet enough these days about a taboo making us overlook heavy arguments in the end of the day, pls.

2 Arts collection requested

As already mentioned elsewhere they B-Newspaper announced now to make seriousness and connect their ideology critiques back to the Christian root of Enlightenment. Doh. Even under a signs of nowadays grown influence of Islam related issues, a world, right? Now, if I look onto the arts collection presented by Adorno, lets take the minima moralia of suitable or less suitable, the dark and the bright,  pieces, motherom,  but all bespoken,

-1Where do I have an update for the actual situation? Or to say a wrapper?

-2Where do I have an collecting intent, of what might come nearest? In case there existed nothing proper?

-3Where do I have the request of collection research and or a piece production in case of need?

-4Where do I have the sabelotodo analysis of why all the above failed and how could be done else? I googled an found

  leftist church

Theo van Gogh, great grandchild of the famous and eponymous arts collector Theo “van Gogh” (compare MM) : Occasionally murdered himself while he could not complete a work  “van een moordenaar die uit de linkse kerk afkomstig was. ” Rather unintelligible these flat pidgin, is not it? I gots:  he was uit(=from) de (the) linkse (leftist) Kerk (church) afkomstig (this a very interesting word: if means sprung from the ape or springing ape, and they say it a way as to German teach. ) Rather criminal guesses me. Criminal story was it? Or Novella. Rather Hamlet style. Little late, though.

Well, one could request another one anyway, (Novella request linkse kerk II). And what did I want to say? and Forgot what? tuh Yes. Even the news article about the new crusades B78 later speech of this post stated that even I mean the catholics were now integrated into it Linkskartell, leftist cartel: latterly. Yes, I know sometimes is always first time, and you got me, who did not always knew them Dutch. Wasnt them those where one bored a hole into the other ones’ dike, just only for to assassinate next day dike constructor and family? That were others? – But I mean: this one is not preceded in history, stumbles I. A bashing. A catholic bashing, itsa antisemitism, they say. Is not “everything so terribly verzwickt?”.  Terrrible.

an issue to stick thinking enough. And it might show a lot of things, to expect. But was he, or what is more important even: his works, an Adornitical Critiques back to the Christian roots, a Christ, to meet a collection criterion? Maybe someone convinces me, but I would mean with certain right self speakingly : not yet. A Feature Request.

Well, not to forget, that I found a recent Gollum’s “what has it in its pocket” suitable for the occasion in previous post, I did. Too hold something.

one word why is there no arts yet?

Yes, one could Feature Request some art pieces, that easy. Wish you something, kinda, cause you suppose to be existable a world within its means, means that you cannot presume for the existent one. Thats true? Why is there no arts yet at all, this question is one of the Adorno “Highways“.

The Fascism says Adorno, the Islam-Fascism someone from Bahamas could have said.

So what would he sceptisizice, esceptitude, I can leave a bet, so how about this one? You know in the Dialectic of Enlightenment he lauds Göbbel for his insight about the topic, cause he resulted the chief of its topic’s domain, he Adorno declared to true, namely a quote from him, that goes: “Kunst ist Werbung”. Art is advertisements.

The One Not Stupid enougH, not to find his own stupidness

Note, that the clue here consists just in “being not stupid enough”, that is not lacking even the insight of one’s own stupidness, “former which” is comfortably less miserably then the mere stupidness, while “latter which” mainly blocks us in fascist times. Imho the first instance piece of arts that prominently reflects it issue comes here: https://musescore.com/classicman/scores/5085024

Symphony No. 5, 3rd Movement; was not it easy to keep dadadaduu going fluently. And? We needed find secondly, how we are hindered, to repair it a whole deal, right? And? For to see, how, implicates that we needed to acknowledge first that we are hindered: you can study it 1,3 and half movements long. Indeed there is fascist dictator ship that got control over our inner time slice rhythm machine, which first needs be wiped out, identified and wiped out, before doing any further step, let’s have: above all. It is the music of Ludwig van Beethoven that performs that, well tackles that, battles there. An overture it is, is not it?

Check it ..

An Islam issues, yet?

So straight forward: if one founds antisemitism within the Muslims these days and you hold it as a superstition, to say a an ordinary fall back to heathendom, these groups are suffering upon. A “Who could help them out?” suggests that there were still persons around to help out of a such. Obviously we got no persons any more these days of that enlightenment height: for anybody in his or herself to feel the bug.

In the sense of “Bachofen” Aph.6 Antithese you found matriarchalist advised by even worse matriarchalist, is that true? So how about stopping that paulatinamente?

So the argument was, since the culture industrial era, starting with the times of so labeled fascism, lately came out that there is a monster threat for anybody affecting those set out and thus suspected to deliver production:  mere collectors, more or less definitive artists, delinquents.

Collectors of arts in a most general sense, those who mention arrangements of  constellations of art works for some goal, not less included.

That is something, that surely is not commonly awared. But I mean how can it be that even to those whom it grilles? Indeed just a very monstrous form of Positivism painted by Adorno, too, in which any functional faculty got the general most embarrassing impossibility, one wishes not to deal with: that a human being’s pity-causing, while living through time slots in which he human is doomed to act within stupidity, work time, as professionally meant work time is referred to with in it bet, ok? No you find it iterating one faculty after another, where you found it sleep robbing for the first, were it e.g. medicine or e.g. constructions selling etc, like you should find for any. So you end up with Arts the same the horrid spectacle. “They were nice people, if not just at work” Aph. 80 Diagnose, Minima Moralia, right? So even they artists could be found machines as the other workers? One word: I could bet that none of these, lets say have not even noticed Adorno-Göbbel’s Warning, first and secondly are not even been taught. Try it, out they do not know anything of Adorno at all first, next they might have read it sporadic passages between their Micky Mouse Positivism literature insolence. So in the end all these nowadays artists students, lets now fix it to the those, were throughout their whole career left without not the least help, which were just one word a warning equipped to their building and against Göbbels word to fulfill unhindered, right? It is a bug reported, right under the feature request. You could believe that not even the cheapest warning is afforded to help those from out of objective misery? No? Try it out, it is a huge bug fix potential, to be first bet on and second to actually do help them. On the one hand, on the other one an always welcome stimulation it was for it feature request in question to get it going, it was not? It was, meant I. Two pence.

Devamp a little faster:

We need something Islam related lately

Well, another thing, there is a nice historical introduction Die unkultivierte Aneignung on Muslim slavery, that states the Muslim “neck” (Koran) slavery about ten times worse than the concurrent western one first and second than it was thought. (And, yes, and an anyway interesting side information of this research complete the picture in that the last fatwa did not say perhaps to stop but to pause it slavery within the circumstances. )

Slavery as if it were something bad

But – I mean – you say slavery as if it were something bad. Well, given the common sense of a western situation and Islamic slavery practices such the thing would be clear, though. Unfortunately, however, we deal with a field where over common sense  the analytics got prevalence optimum. And the exit zone, the paths of Enlightenment thoughts a virtual substance so to say, out of slavery is fragile a thing, easily blown up by an asozials bashing that dull far from, kind of opposite of an empowerment even as you might compare Novella style Mk,7:1-23 next post. Even though this might be mindless resentment, the economical potential to suck from while doing so gets evident and is eminent, thus the delinquency of such practice. I sure that enough people would not get me, this says that the resentment is supposedly driven from the wish of and to slavery itself plus any further evil: How could it, resentment, be else that boringly unsuppressable, if was not the sheer will to achieve such consequence behind, plus something worse as said. – But it is true, you can not leave it (meanness of asocials bashing) out, would you? Well nobody knows actually, but thats gonna be a strict mathematical deem.

So lets have for a problem that if people wake up from a satanist state, such as notorious social fascism, often enough as a matter of fact they got to have a break at an intermediary stage that was kind formally slavery on their search to enlightenment. (I pointed to Epheser 6,6 somewhere, did I?)

So, to find a place, where to drop it, talking about social fascism there is actually no competition as of market wares, working capacities or the like. There is rather an preemption around more or less pleasant servant stables to flee to. Also it has been missed to measure such social fascism, its strength and impact, along an over dimensioned increased and expectedly increasing parameter of productivity in order to find a psychic measure, distance from truth to theater (betrayal), which could then for example explain the need for drugs consumption as a compensatory stabilization means these days. To draw the interest, lets have, to the central concept of a society, one might have that there was always a certain betrayal at selling things just part of the game, which well then already starts to destroy the legal term of a socius-ity, thus its own definition, satanism starts greeting – arguably.  What we need to find however at higher degrees of productivity, lately lets have from now on at least, is a rather complete “absence of a valid subject matter“. (Wegfall der Geschäftsgrundlage no pun intended -by my sight; could not believe the English phrasing, well:), a spectre. Asozials in a so defined superstitious, lately original heathenish thinking are those disgraced by or (culpably) disgracing the spectre. Adorno explains the at- and detraction forces within such human stables in the Aph. 49 Moral und Zeitordnung as jealousy. At least it seems bold that a dynamically free, an euphemism for uncontrolled, floating servant system, adjusted right to the very Asozials bashing taste, satisfaction, of a social fascists got advantages over a traditional, legal serfdom by axiom. To add is moreover that the relevance of a second important density parameter: general (especially to spectre) contribution-free income security were overlooked to understand social fascism and its rationalizations on happenings in and around stables industries so to say. Sure, where the spectre gots pissed once a while, it shines less dull, no? So by this parameter you got a house number of spectre’s dullness might, to say to answers to the question: in how many parts on earth at a time more than zero would a figure like Jesus survive to lance his offenses so long? Whereas the zero level could be got a catastrophic quality, it is not yet reached, I mean (measure) there are still people with “Arbeit ist Scheiße”, “Work is shit” stickers on the road and in the working offices, offending that instance who “got against inhumanity nothing, but against bad behavior the more”: society MM, at least here in Germany – in some places, being (cultural-industrial) fake or not yet. This, to got a deem as in how far impacts getting nearer.

 vamps swallowed Göthe (they say)

reread that: it states and makes plausible, why a thinker as “Göthe” might not be allowed to “publish” anymore these days of Islamic, European pc fascism. Apologeticism how they called it was even stronger in the west. I often heard that. Imagine they are forbidding Göthe, their show case! True, check it! Surely, they would object that his cultivation were not yet the that developed, believes I they would. Well, was not he anyway on the way to underground. Yes, but with the difference that today they would find him. Imho, it is not that it were not worth to buy their extrablatt therefore, but that it is not in the net, I mean for public reference. People are still underestimating what generosity a tiny url could effectuate.  If you asked me, however, which I preferred online, I would nonetheless choose this one:

Together with the article Der Westen liegt im Abendland that asks the headscarf to be prohibited, because once dominant it gots totalitarian a command, thing, which makes me tempted. They say to ultimately confront the Islam with the means of Christianity were a good an idea for these days. But what?

How is it? Well, in resume to have it short, I found that as a preliminary condition to such a side’s project, what is needed is a exculpation for not having paid a unconditional basic income (specially to the women, lets go here now) during 1300 years, to say at least till the age, when Islam found urge to grow, since 600 to now.

darn single sentence to bet on

Now, btw. questioning why it endured so long, till something “exploded”, that blew Christianity to the mountains, one could assume, that the flaw of Christianity, namely its re-heathening, – to meet S. Freud, growing worse re-heathening to correct him, should have coincided a big deal with disappearance of the Koine language as lingua franca, when people lost ability to understand the Gospel text’s principle and this is most precisely in such case vamp’s having worked hard to devaluate the first sentence of an agenda, which is first sentence of sermon of the mountain, Matth. 5.3, bets I.

high smut

So, do you imagine what do I think? If there are still humans in the year 8000 p.c., they should have returned to talk, well, smut (which is how they call koine, right?) as lingua franca therefore and in consequence,  decently and early enough, no way around. Thing I propose. Novella request. They got to got an alternative to make  them dikes flatter and flatter, gotten’t they?

wait, is it feminine or neuter, i wonders, too.

I touched that lengthily in the other post, meanwhile I ignore still, from which secondary literature Adorno had it. Could it be a problem to translate a darn single sentence to basic income? Lately? To lift up a another dwarf’s swindle? One needed to detract the full Hegelian Poison from them first, bets I. It was Brecht, who said so much were won, if there is one who stands up and says No. And I checked “Herr Keuner” being locked out from public domain, that yes.

Hm, how to heal with it anyhow? I should add to my prayers book a prayer (we Germans say /Ge-)”bet” to it, really, so to add it to my bet book, to bet for a best amend. (Novella Request)

To acknowledge the mistake, the sin in the true meaning of the word, includes to substantiate to better in the future. It could be interesting to investigate how the reconquest or territory went a long with a rechristianization in some cases, Romania or Spain, along the parameter of such a less and less believed promise, and in others not: Like Northern Africa was occupied by France some time, right? To ground this thought I would like to point to Adornos Minima Moralia, and here the aphorism about the woman stuffs. Mom. Not only that he lamented in “Ausgrabung”, that the rise in productivity did not grasp the occasion in  freeing the woman from the labor market. In Aph. 109 “L’inutile beauté” he pointed out, that “Eingegliederte Schönheit”, (economically) integrated beauty led to the production of unhappy lives of femmes fatales, due to reification (Verdinglichung), in this case of women, in other words just the worst thing ever, not less.”For” some ordinary suspects , Aph. Hans Guck in die Luft, surely enough to loose right  critizing a counter means, that indeed is the headscarf, and messing up the chance to argue something that might be arguable “in itself”.  Ok? You got me, known story ..

Well speaking about arts and its historic use in a general sense, one stumbles with the: upcoming of the slightly overlooked vampire mythology, to look up for solutions in this respect ultimately or to come in so to say.

a sexy vamp surfing (fasten belts)

Well, I did some reading in the meanwhile. So how happened rechristianization, to be seen as re-enlightenment mission in history? To say, typically to suppose? Which kind of role a vampire motive could be made out?

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_III._Dr%C4%83culea#Kampfhandlungen

Chronisten zufolge fanden die Türken einen „wahren Wald mit Gepfählten“ vor. Eine halbe Stunde lang soll die osmanische Armee an etwa 20.000 gepfählten türkischen Gefangenen und bulgarischen Muslimen vorbeigezogen sein.

Chalcondyles schrieb über die Reaktion des Sultans:

Der Imperator war so überwältigt von dem Bild, welches sich ihm bot, und stellte fest, dass er dieses Land nicht von dem Mann nehmen könne, der solche Dinge bewerkstelligen und die Herrschaft über seine Untertanen derart ausschöpfen konnte. Ein Mann, der dieses bewerkstelligt hatte, sei sicherlich zu Größerem berufen.[10]

but:

Vlad konnte nach Siebenbürgen entkommen und begab sich danach in die Obhut des ungarischen Königs Matthias Corvinus. Dieser inhaftierte Vlad zwölf Jahre …

Die Literatur spekuliert, dass Matthias Corvinus sich auf diese Weise seines lästigen Konkurrenten Vlad entledigen wollte, der ihm die führende Rolle als Kämpfer gegen die Türken streitig zu machen drohte.

and:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Türkenkriege

Es war nicht notwendig, zum Islam zu konvertieren, um im Osmanischen Reich Karriere zu machen. Die Hilfsvölker der Osmanen waren überwiegend orthodoxe Christen.[1] Die Eroberung Südosteuropas war demnach keine reine Invasion aus Asien, sondern auch eine Art von „Bürgerkrieg“ zwischen Anhängern und Gegnern der Osmanen.[2]

But there was not any “true” (non military) conversion from Islam to Christianity like in the earlier days of Roman Empire?  Answer in 700 hundred years? Non. It seemed that the Christian logic stopped to succeed missioning apostated cultures , meanwhile missioning of heathens happened thereby as if nothing. Kind of a taboo, that they could not convince anymore, those believers of an ideology that was developed as a counter measure, ah? Right. With stress on the word “they”. What happened to them outof-islam-missioners in the instant, was the first question?

Well, they balkanized as the seven dwarfs, allies and opponents alike. Not even sure who made use of whom. Today’s opponents (of a problem that they arguably made out as Islam, I well talk about a Bahamas) should reflect that they are pulled into an overall theater, that they could not escape just because having fallen to a satanism. A monist economic fascism speech of.  Hegelean Poison, for my sake to recognize a vampirism, a post Christ idolatry with it. It is: closing the gap of critical theory and an Islam critiques not bad. From this point of view it is typical for heathenish “circular thinking” that one could argue with out end, what came over or for whom: the re-heathenished snow-wighted Christians peoples, the Islam, the vampires believes.  Just the warning to keep away from integrating in it naively against any Islam, that was rather  a mirroring or lately a contribution to it overall mechanism and thus trap, but to overcome it pattern as a whole. To watch out and find a solution: cause…

A second one, the “why” they did not succeed integrates in what was already given an answering effort in post.

“Vampire sollen eine starke Anziehungskraft auf das von ihnen gewählte Geschlecht ausüben und Verführungskünstler sein.”

Ernst Stöhrs Vampir (1899)

Philip Burne-Jones: Der Vampir, 1897

I got these new trolls were females. First. Now, somewhere in post I already deduced the connection of Adorno, Woman, Beauty, Headscarf, economically soul-poisonedness out of sexual context.

wait: basic income, if you dare thinking

Then, if you dare thinking, one knows you dont: occultism and Islam.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasie_im_Islam

“” Das Wichtige ist, dass, wenn du den Islam verlässt, du mit deinem Wissen dem Islam keinen Schaden zufügst!“”(“…else we kill you”, said somebody. )

compare: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dracula/Chapter_27

“I asked each passenger, no one would give me the slightest explanation.”

Burger!

Vapirgespenst

date
Di 18. Dez 18:55:15 CET 2018

Faust=Tepes; Mighty through King’s consultation, says out of a:”Als Menschenfluten Land und Volk ersäuften”.

Wo der und der so sehr es ihn erschrecken, sein Liebstes hier und dort versteckte.” Stop. This is unhelped wound finding, who knew German tales, a grammatical case neutrum, but of higher, and as such devilish danger of confusion with something vivid, measures I and holds till the last objection: “Sein Liebstes.” There is that tale about that, and: We need that. And, you see Dracula digging in the ground, did you? The devil proposes to assure the military, than state budget from the people’s accumulated angst of usual this havoc. “Für einen Narren spricht er gar nicht schlecht. Das ist für wahr des alten Kaisers recht”, entering not without effort but accumulating to dominant state reasoning till the day of just, you know, now.

Listen:

Der Kaiser will es soll sofort geschehen.

Will Helena und Paris vor sich sehen.

.. Du hast Geselle (Teufel) nicht bedacht, wohin uns deine Künst führen.

Erst haben wir ihn reich gemacht, jetzt:

sollen wir ihn amüsieren!

Der Teufel aber: Du wähnst es füge sich sogleich.

Hier stehen wir vor steileren Stufen, greifst in ein innerstes Bereich, glaubst Helenen so leicht hervorzurufen wie das vapir gespenst der Gulden. Vapir gespenst der Gulden: Material Analysis of an Islam aware and not aware world. The highest quality I got, out of the recents. Something else? ooh? Anybody would terribly grasp a spark from it if you did read it this way from first to last syllable. And, you got according to this work, two monadic figure, the bewitched political leader and the but terribly geistig unhelped people, lost the same even with or without the money.

“Wer fälschte hier des Kaisers Namenzug, ist solche Verbrechen ungestraft geblieben, erinnere dich hast selbst es unterschrieben”.

“Bei aller Schätzeflor, so wie ihr gewesen seid ihr nach wie vor.” As just monetary exploitation of the wounds is disabling its proper previous healing.

Ding, Finding, The holy water to understand in novellas of a Tepes-figure consists not only first of just in enlightenment but rather even than important is blood sparing a technique against heathen danger, since ever and Islam now, too, in a  trench warfare field, the nomansland a spectacle sublimed lets say these – “Front-Fussball” anno 1917,18? dunno? Meeting ones own unenlightened overall political control scheme human victim minimation, bad, but arguably not worse than its bewitched normal subjects. Ok? Hans Guck in die Luft, an Aphorism, and so on, you got me?

 

 

Finding. Leonore. Stokes’ (and Poe’s and genre and co.) literature on the crusaders goes down to turn into an embracement of Burger’s meditation at the Vampire thing and it says:

Lenore’ns Herz, mit Beben,
Rang zwischen Tod und Leben.

“the worst thing ever”, as I mentioned in post. So: is it here “to pull oneself from the own pigtail out to the mud” (MM), I would ask way too pious?

Insights: Islam and the tomoney-function

date
Di 2. Okt 20:53:19 CEST 2018

Ok, now, I believe, I got the missing link between the Islam and the tomoney-function. The money for the people, their wealth and materialist spoken, is generated by, within, thanks to the “Bürgertum” (Burgeoisie)- by a dense  deposit of writers, the novella-ist style, pseudepigraphs. We got that in Greece, Göthe envied Sophokles, when saying in Weimar are living 10.000 (hidden helpers) poets. So we got it in Germany, thus England as seen. And we got it who dares doubting in Judäa and Israel. -at least.

Who are Socialdemocrates in this respect: if not they are Bürgers, they were superstitious nützlich, useful, by times. (for standing prominent namely)

Socialdemocracyvampire_bug-duty

Pericopes oracles theses days:(Besides that you got covered opinion at the Media, whilst for example an american president Trump needs to show up as ultrafeminist like B75 article Amerikas Wahlverlierer im antifaschistischen Abwehrkampf proposes and the following one Der Griff ans Geschlecht, -or reflecting the reality is what I saw from the German tv production documentation film, which was forbidden first, but now on youtube amongst heavy, heavy censorship and reputation pressuring. It says that it is just Gaza, there where “Hitler” (Aph. Hans Guck in die Luft) 2 is shown in public cinemas in 2017, where you find the opinion: reduce the certain unreasonable donation flow to zero now.

We have a situation of historicly islam-related materialist “vampire” dream. Where the “vampires”, – notorious Islam overlookers are they -, and tabooized as such, are balcanizing, lately against, that is in front of, an Islam. In other words they are  hopping to and from reason’s side in an – objectively seen – casual way.

Especially they are harming, havoc causal, when their being shadowed act as missioner in the shadowed area. What if they are not they who hinder themselves not to fall into even getting pseudo-anti-racists, what then gives straight the hand a materialist effect per “Melange”, an Aphorism, to new “concentration camping” and by, btw: the heathenish dimension of counter effort per Maxime minimal against those latter, right? (First no second Ausschwitz pls, said Adorno)

So whats wrong with them? Nothing, but the rule goes that one should not go under what the most “simple minded” found yet as substantial truth. (- Thing that would happen them as islam-related vampire classified often enough and too much, and: there maybe not so simple minded partner, the affected, infected, hopeful us). So that is an the rule. What says the rule? We should not enjoy them demons=vampire to do exactly what? Mom.. do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven. Well it says that, ehm, we shall rejoice, first, but second, too: we must not rejoice that they obey us. This tell of a imposed duty to free them by enlightening. Ah, here is the quote, somewhat loud is it, is not it:

Luke 10:17-21 New International Version (NIV)

17 The seventy-two returned with joy and said, “Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name.”

18 He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. 19 I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you. 20 However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.”

21 At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this is what you were pleased to do.

 

As the wealth they praise themselves having been fought by them, is produced, as it seems to them over more, by them, and they searching their hail, in the darkness of their superstition, when heading once more for more “Leistungsgerechtigkeit”, justice of performance. Bitting the hand that feeds them – in concert with other leftists. There superstition runs left alone into quick ruin, typically and out of their superstition they need culprits next: structural antisemitism, if they cannot pull on a the weather. Arguably forbidden.

Rev: this is false: Actually they miss not only a culprit push their shame onto, but even from the beginning on an adversary to feed joy of being heroes. Their business is (still, among, softer than others) exploiting the believe that there were money house hundreds or thousand times bigger than the annual world income, where the misery stems from and not vast masses of superstitious people, mainly: their own followers, attracted or seduced that way.

Comment: the only thing I would admit, is that one seemed that ones is recognized as “social” or “socialdem”, but falsely enough, for being perceived as “generous“: “Uh, those who want let me live a little time longer, were not them praised: Social?” Kinda.

Well addressing the Islam is clear now: a considerable mass of pseudepigraphs is needed to combat the tabus of ever lasting heathendom, so granting whatswastheword intransigence as a coined idea, so granting soon: wealth. Personal wealth for everybody on planet and or country. So: But we got conflicting the Islamicly set taboos with the pseudepigraph taboo, as Theo van Gogh teaches, arguably.  There is one of the instances in historical game, that manages to hold the, a, its taboo that untouchable to still unknowns levels in these days as seen that the taboo combatants, in this case our wealth generating pseudepigraphs, can not cope with it: helped to die out soon. Now.

lets note that such “socials” classified type, its main business and original approach or to say applause, is to hunt them freely thinking ones as “asozials”, MM, Aph. 126 I. Q. At this highly critical, fragile point, I should not bark, but claim, pray you, on my knees, from any naming of the word SOCIAL to hit the epistemologic grounds of the term first, instead of prematurely making cheap fun about what comes out as human dignity in the end. This especially when lanced by your seemingly younger co-workers writers, (who better should be taught and checked a while by the elders.) Is that to asked too much, to be careful, if that what you are just doing with is identified as: a the centuries’ precipice itself. Do not get me wrong, just explain on a western and eastern cultural plane, lets have Mk7, where they argued “social” or “common” as dirty, so your out of the worst superficiality, are not you?

Anamnesis of Islam tabooed no material remedy still

Indeed we got a 50 years after the last novellaic incident, let us have indeed Burger’s Leonore, with was spur of what led into the seeds of horror industries. We found Adgar “Allan Poe” to prominent yet in Adornos Aph. 150 Extrablatt: industrial times News exploitation, Brahm Stokers seemed to have fitted without a further silaba, syllable, I am fighting with english language, you see. But he notably set it out as a last communication effort with any, lets have German Burger, activists to keep the novella machine running at his so far. And his upstream stuff, we found it work packaged as anamemnis,  pardon anamemnesis, pardon anamnesis, nesis like nose, the nose of anam, just kidding. So we found a medical case story show case ware, of a the western man, suffering Islam tabooisation, of a nutcase under his halluzinations, rationalized by all the fancy vampire idolatry.

Too fit to pretty as a main witness I recall  (arts figure found) the scene of late chapter one, where Jonathan Harker was taught a the first lesson, that namely running unto the custody of Count Dracula, (Tepes! Finding: Dracula is a true novella as Göthe’s, explaining the coherence but including the Islam), was splendid a goal, because it offered -in his but very situation -the only chance to escape the stalking lethal wolves. It fits Tepes’s handwriting, says I, you found it not somewhere, but just nowhere else at the islamo-western war front line.

8 Hope, sadness of the ever superstition solving enlightenment acts

Ok, ok we might find it all under most closed cultural industrial custody, the license, the allowing of this arts figure is guaranteed, business as normal, with it I-apologism, common sense so to say ruling, but we were not matan if we would stood not with a holy water drop by it: These days says my matan, the holy water drop has even more than an avalanche mass

9 the twodimensional swinging masses bet of mines

Yes, I am fancily recording the days of reading the MM-Book, with all those fancy entities such Thinkers as lets say Leibnitz and Adorno not less. As of gravitating centers of masses and it all solution huge and imprevisious of a well agregation switch solid to fluid, identified as the solution call. The monadology and you go a godly monad even. Abgespaced these professors why not. I, however, at this whole denegetable in a kind of betterish way, whould come across these and would mean that even in n-Dimensional case, well that a masses and a one in any case not mine, you got the extended object, corpus, bodies: swinging: in the 2-dimensional plane with a betting rate considerable: shaarp. Sharp enough for the betting, speculation, to expect. If that what it is registering the due to extinct, but experiences its preemtping regrows, it moves  somehow on a transition away.

we got soon enough to the spheres of psyche and human culture history to modern days. When we hold Adorno’s “foreseeable ideology to enlightenment switches“, when he the nazis (the former Islam friends, or apologists, in their misery on a since Tepes scope, well,

btw we got from in-Tepes=Islam consideration of a Poland nation state as a result of a Tepes-Nation state Balcanization, too, btw, if that was about any novella request interest, it was.)

reproaches, they had not rejoiced “Paris” MM. They would not pay, more than once he wrote. Anything lied had then only oscillation time to live, yes, but it was due to know not to get a fooled fallen crook by anyway enough. It is quite precise now.

I mean: At least before a such godly solution: In how not completing the description of:

the form of an demolition ball as some did already found speech for, but is seems more probable says it matan, it was first of those intended to knock out a rather little singularity as burgerdom than the leftist, just as if were a vampire joke at start, and second it drives in a trajectory and its says that it was typically of a swinging back property, hair crossing those typically to no where else it once was set to move, no? Those, we ought to pray for you, to keep away from it damn hair cross trajectory. Matan could be read as: describe obvious situation, till and before a voice of the reason would have begun to rule once. A future situation of having gotten rid of superstition but hopefully in good, aufgeklärte, enlightened way, was its, matan’s, good dream.

A “Krankenakte” to be exploited directly as literature, literature seed of a horror literature industry. Merits shall go to the soon died, for having hung the warning sign at it avalanche thing. But the finding at following a signal of trans-generation novella production, that thing I said that is to keep all alive, is that it broke of at this height, times, needing some decent afreshment a hundred years later. The dog-style sin of the socials these day would be: to follow a way, once taken once that led there out into jealousy. Aph. 44. “Festhalten verliert gerade sein Objekt aus den Händen”. In self assurance of success to help an increased number of individuals, one overlooked in the vane of tabooism that the most needy were not not even not shelter, but regularly: exposed, as regular victims, that is the pose of selling poverty fighters as own contribution in the poverty fight to an uncertain some what, as one wants to see it like that. “Were” in indicative. And “Are”: in indicative, too. And with all due respect: yous Neo-SPds is not looking like to be keen for campaigning as for a remedy just such, so easily, I would bet highly against yous. In special aspect they they apparently do not want to dignify the a pseudoepigraph will difficultly sell his work. He the smell of wanting somethinger eagerly getting repair by an occultist mechanism what ever, lets have by economic occultism virulent at this point, -in over mighty at their thong. They well cannot neither buy nor sell, but must pay. Here is were their barefaced anger raises, that better helps them not to vote at all. In either case you got to many of them, not in number to less for you, but to many against a the aim as such. You hold a pool but of those, the first moment you wave “social”-banner.

So: You might think that I might be to harsh with all these world murders, then let my drop a test for you to play so long. Quiz. A thought experiment, is it? Given a middle young man, in full strength, thus best chances, fairly education, with fairly good job chances, Oh no!, lets have splendid rates of effort to outcome in as far as market term, let us say in terms of common sense, compared with an any other human being on the world, pitiably so much not of his age, not of his color or sex or of else what, and then “we” even asked: Do you agree it certain to have in the very very very first line to have exactly him secured to be fed by but workless income stream? Yes or rather not so much at all yes? Think careful, cause we will catch each of yous world murders in the end of days! And if so, I am sure you to agree. It got to be time, no? (;

Poverty is producing, possibility of a future turning back unclear.

Roughly spoken:

They intermingle especially when pseudepigraphs claim material human dignity level for their locals, perhaps set better than other people on earth, and thus by any hired or not so hired opponents blamed for (anti-melange-anti-)racism, out of not any or not “the” group of under-privileged, but out of a group that is voiced and that is there to trickily conquest the host communities: that way. Altogether, however, we are fighting with our own fascist stupidity more than everything, arguably, yet, not with whom, who is anyway keen to sweep the shards. Just: classically the whole story of a the novella.

So speaking about escapes, one one needed were a “agricultural” building of dense mass of (novellaist) poets. A building

-A in material senses and

-B in non-material sense to, B conflicting here to note..

Thus there are several mistakes so profound about their duty. About the storm, a dike against, and an effort about. Here comprises almost everything what comprises scattered in a Bahamas, Minima Moralia or in this blog. The special, or eminent, -all kid could know -, means for an upcoming these-days project in comparison to a former  were: the rise of productivity, a weather: world change speed, is not preceded, to come along with the healing production, lets deem for 10 to 1 persons nurtured 100. On the other hand we must recover what, let us have about 6: generations left bare. Late died out exception Novellaists, Thomas Mann ..?, included and due to still virulent (not only the card carrying one) fascism, its unpreceded reach to human soul and its but vast accumulation of Un-fug driving people directly into schizophrenia.

It seems not enough to just limit supply one areal country, but in internet times 161, right? So effort deem=6*161*10?  echo 10*6*161|bc
9660. So we needed to make up leeway 10 billion poets in Weimar, or at least we needed a Weimar 1oooo times more poetic. That is were a house number, to catch the economical and educational resources for. Call it social-democratic then. Still. Do you?

In this league the economic occultism, the rationalizations of positivism, Adorno spoke of,  eg. when hunting asocial social types, feels commodo, right?

Btw: Just like Marx did well in opening the ideology critique but bad by just falling far behind the ancients, lets have the Christians (he fell back even behind their ancient adversaries to be precise and to give it a Mehrwert), in it, I mean Bahamas is to be lauded for insisting to integrate the Islam into to state of the art philosophy, but struggles with mainly the same handicap. So – I hope now everything is said lo bastante explicit now.

the result: says something like: first recognize, then control but enlighten the human being in a world wide and enligthenment-historical, but anyway Islam aware, scope from out of a heathenish snow-white  scheme! A snow white scheme which? I humbly would deem in a monadological way, well geometrically one one-dimensional line from one point to the other, lets say snow white and stepmother, that starts to dissolve from out of a casual point in the middle, fallen each into its spectrum, faculty, or racket. This enlightening strategy informs that is it unpredictable if lets say the awaken snowwhit, the awaken dwarf, the awaken bad queen will trick the other ones into transmogrification (“Verwandlung”: Canetti Masse und Macht) to (enlightened) human and to lets say disempower the ideology aka superstition of it scene. In any case I would forget on top of that to propose and novella request.

And at least it vamp motive seems to fit too neatly to the requirement. A finding. – But… even though we are far from reaching ground, we could watch out for messed approaches to tackle it problem, could not we? Mom.  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruzifix

“So sollen Knoblauch und Darstellungen eines Kruzifix der Abschreckung dienen.”

and I says: http://www.copyriot.com/sinistra/reading/agnado/minima.html

Yes, I know this is late, I bet you knew this three ones, yet. How about this one?

So schrieb Papst Benedikt XIV.  bla bla abla  der als fortschrittlich und Förderer der Aufklärung galt, blaballa.., diejenigen Priester, die den Aberglauben noch fördern, ihres Amtes zu entheben.

Yes, I know, what you would object, he messed it up, cause obviously we are still with it problem till the day of today. But I says piously the holy father did already with the right button. Look, if you for example watch out for an Aberglauben, idolatry, you needed to understand a vampire picturing an intended step out the “formalist circles”, Aph. 127 Wishful Thinking, of Hegelian Poison, arguably, and there you could absolve them: “It is rather Hegelian Poison you addressed these days.”

Thing  today they are vastly infected of. A Finding. Go ask them: “Have you ever heard about a Hegelean Poison? Never mind, you are already infected? So, have you maybe read the famous work of Minima Moralia, yet? You wont read it? Because you have much to do, 80h a week help your poor sheep is more important, says you? – None of you guys? Uh, I see.” You see how I am asylum clowning here at Bahamas Ministerio, do you? Imagine! Do not I send email loads they’d sharpened there spam filters next day? Lets drop this: If we just kicked just the half of them out and replaced them posts with half that superstitious Ministers, means I, pick one from out of 3 my counter measures, we gotta be out of the worst, I keep on saying. Two pence.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampir#Zugeschriebene_Eigenschaften

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morisken#Kultur

Was it ultimately topic of this post? It was? How about them  devamp a little faster, could not they? Two pence.

You can not trust me.

“”Für Martin Stobbe steht fest: Der Westen liegt jenseits des Atlantiks. Seine Anmerkungen zu Trumps America First-Politik, den Voraussetzungen für eine Wiedererrichtung des Westens und einer jüngst erfolgten Zäsur in der antideutschen Israelsolidarität.””

Just reread this one. He said there was a turning point. I wont say no.

Terrific to see this rabid leftists. Too obvious  the traces of plain satanism they bear from their very root. It is incredible, but I believe, what he is saying. I said often enough them Bahamas the same, I wont trust them even the same and asked them to strip it off. I mean when they talk about asociality blurrily,

talk about associality blurrily

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asozialit%C3%A4t#

Aus konstruktivistischer und diskursanalytischer Sicht ist die soziale Konstruktion der ‘Asozialität’ durch Behörden, Politiker, Sozialwissenschaftler, Journalisten und durch den Alltagsdiskurs nicht weniger erklärungsbedürftig als das vermeintlich ‘asoziale’ Verhalten selbst.

Says a Nameless Wikipedia author.

I, however, give you even it explication, read it like that and you do with the analytics. You know, it is not that such a asocials prosecution is the most hate-worthy thing, rather that is it is hate-worthy enough, if you compare lets say Matthew 6.24. You see the complete turning point of Adorno’s teaching about the ontology of occultism. By usurping secret keepers. Why not earn from a new upcoming concentration camping, if we could sell it as Jews protection before the Asozials. It generalized Associals persecution fills the gap of economic theory, backed by lets not lie the authoritarian tone of  half live longing careers of positivist social science.  „War Adorno ein Nazi?“ If not today, maybe tomorrow.

I feel helpless, this is terrible, not to be underestimated and should be worse than I observe superficially on the one hand, on the other at any edge changing the occultist rationalizations towards enlightenment came with ease, any day, to any person. Communists still ranting against “Associal” these days, did you got tones? Was it a long organization to deploy this post? Yes, sure Israel protection, but one could not be endlessly that bad to the assozial homies neither. Another question: How much does it need still to speak a Hitler free? There is still crumble zone enough? I do not know, you’d knew better, cause its your business, is not it?

Terrible.

below the deep conviction, that actuating as Hegelean poisoned is something allowed unqestionedly and next: Just allowed to them unquestioning ones. The partner of a deal is a socius. Who allowed to heave it economical concept into the political sphere? Unapproved? Was it not known that undue use let to dramatic consequences? Was it not so, that the social satanist took the counterparts to feed their idiocy, in order to one step later do what they looked like, extinct a whole Millions of Jews instead. It just needs two, three “axiomatic” disparates, and they have reached there. Remote controlled by “the evil” so to say, they sooner or later work together. Bulletproof cause you find them randomly at both sides of the barricade. I wonder how happened what I once read, namely that the U-bahn song was not forbidden. Fits neatly for those heroic merit earners, who are parked to deny reconstructing a Jews concentration camps, meanwhile full of loads building the way to there.   …  The article perhaps deciphers the phenomenon on a descriptive level, the break through (or rather break down) would be reaching the analytic one: You know, you can not trust me.

political driving license against dwarfish careers

Now, you know? You know what I am thinking about, not actually since yesterday? .. I know this disparate. … There was this film, once mentioned in an article: Annimatrix. There they used a early detection system by setting out a person to a simulated word, kind a dream, to filter out the -by far- untrustworthy ones. Apart from releasing such a political driving license automate or “Wahlomat”, its good or rather bad use, none the less not forbidden it is to speculate on its architecture and – you know- on a the substrate that passes. Maybe by times uncomfortably small, but, however, it would be a chance for democracy in a middle term future, to have another more direct way to restrict political activity from the unwanted, than rely on dwarfish careers. And I mean, as I know the satanists, evil, proud, the schizophrenic ones, I mean, their aversion against “holy water” is as notorious as pathological, thus sure an indicator. So I see rather no conflict with the whatsitsname a negative dialectic, no? The unfiltered is not believed suitable, it is just that there is believed unsuitable, happy to be filtered out. (selbstverschuldet Unmündige, so what?) You find me overly explicit? You should not at this very moment. I mean applying kind a holy water is neither harm nor torture to a person, neither for those fleeing it, while protesting too soon.

One might object that the satanists come up in such unimaginable superior number,  that they sure manipulated the filter, to exactly the last first suitable one to fall out. To enlarge the catastrophe, so to say. Yes, that might be true, but rather sooner than on the long run, and one could just equip the process with such a by-tool. Novella Request.

Two pence.

Bottlepost-Adorno:

still there? You know what? I will stop. But what? I got a Bonbon. More precise you wont get Bottlepost-Adorno’s prophecy from a “word for the moral, Aph.” . You would make me work, I need Internet, to upload it picture. It says from one Article: “For the cross as a public symbol“!  and placed below in the same page from the previous article somewhere in kind incomprehensible positive-social scientific speech:  “..treffende Deutung des dissozierten Sozialtypus des Pränazismus .-” (well chosen interpretation of the dissociated socialtype of prenazism). He said somewhere, he wanted to go with the cross against the Islam, crusade. You go with the cross rather against the own lines in first line, which will take away from the Islam so much ground or need to proceed to not even meet it still afterwords, I would rather deem. And: You cannot do that cause it gonna switch you off entirely, as a matter of fact. Two pence.

A little epilogue

date Sa 29. Dez 21:59:15 CET 2018 here. Yes, I admit, I peeped into the editorial of B79 and dunno story they had with an author and a pizza boys, if that were a parable difficult to decipher, and tatata they came up with the consequence whom to fight on a ground of a asocial-to-social distinction anothers egg-thiefs.

As if asking around whom to fight, as we observe sometimes leftists do, in their “hermetical groups”‘ gatherings -unembarrassed cause sure that nobody stood up and say: shall I better call the police for open delinquency such? Lonely, lonely a voice, for ever. Would you mind? – Yes, sure, they hate themselves for sparing  the Steuerzahler rubber room rubber, such that they charter diliveroo enterprise was its name, to help self destruction. Did I yet found such a pattern, elsewhere? (priests..)

Hm, then, go, – but? Yes, but you need not permit to run before having thought carefully, to say with Hegel against him. Then I could point your hate against a decent enemy too piously even. And. Then, would you bet, I could leave you after at a more in depth meditation about the terms asocial you appended to the pizza-connection. (You may ask) How? Well, you know belts fastened, I said, its a good idea to consider Matth. 6.24: There he defined that what is hate to mamona is love to God. So start first meditation on mamona and surely you will land pretty precisely on the term what today people call most abstractly “society”, used in a style of German “man”, and most strictly excluded the term devil from kinda “dinner party” or a mood of being sociable in one way or the other (Gesellig-keit), or a still private business format  of same label, lets say not yet outgrown to overlap a political institution by definition.

People, we know, were the punks, who said once that they were hating society (  =loving god). Next generation candidates, of lost “Narren der Herrschaft”, Aph. 45 Wie scheint doch alles werdende so krank, yous namely, shall be however this time cured. I would advice to read MM again on that insight, in very heavy cases jump to the “jealousy” Aphorism, Moral und Zeitordnung, was not it number 49? – You would be even first time be able to use the German grammar fully, I fancied here, as recently the double perspective instantiates the indicative-subjunctive challenge.

Anyway, out of that Aph. I see you making a turn in front of your opponent of 180 degrees, and facing the monster itself you should understand that you are there their victim. – But: You could mingle with them for a juster outcast, nothing your shiny successes on Israels behalf will weigh, even the Islam would be less offensive.

A few gpl clones far from paradies (making money)

Late thoughts. Remember, when I was in search of that binary world sys, I found lately in Matth. 6.24, collected in another post? Now its just to light on the interplay of this two worlds once aware, lets say about the insights of Adorno, Göthe, Jesus materialist analysis. Adorno agreed with Göthe’s going down now to underworld as he former holding a bottom landing of it yet. I found some fragments of the Göthe analysis money analysis here in post. So? Now we are going down still. 2019. Probably the adorno style, one assumed. But duff early wrong. .. And I saw the things going bad and found in the end to mold packaging, to say finding a container xyz better than none, of it all to a lets say a: license, of a software dummy dunno. Thats first. Cause I see you anticipate a turbulence steapdom todays menu steaply growing, fasten belts. It could oblique a user to pray a sentence thats all, kind vim helps poor children. Now give it birth then once. .. Yes then the three “profets” above. You got one between, who never found a determining role, this time comes in as the key carrying enlighter, and btw. against will, even. Him. Nietzsche. In monty python he is pretty pictured in the football game as a delinquent among? Exactly. He said: God ist tot. Gott is dead. And here btw. we need to have first one thing, if not there do not even start! Enough patience to discover what was been hidden intentionally in shine world. So, you could bet, as God was never away on the planet, against what Nietzsche vision measured eminent enough, and ensured when feeling lonely while perceiving a terrible threat: the world domination of the godless, and the eternal one, that is accumulating error, which is indeed finding, in a never returning way to other since a time. So there we are, I said nothing new. And listen, I would like to update the matan2019 toolbox. I could do a lot hoo hoo, an unbelievable night mare compilation, but I promise that I can present an idea of a god at least governing right now on earth, well sure but not in the way people lowered as we assume. Ok, than, Nietzsche is to be provenly wrong, a minor voice whispers, when one thing in world happened, that was not acknowledged to all named thinkers, and that is uptonow by a such way condemned matan-society still not even registered. Software. From this point in retrospective you can theoretically devaluate Nietzsches Hypothesis yet. If god was zero, how could you have then a geistig thing, that somehow and anyway once grows. I mean, he, god, might be anywhat, but not just what Nietzsche said in the instance: dead, while growing. Well, the idea behind dark times surviving was since all times bottleposting or prophets series; he, reinvented that. To label a world, virtual machine, god is dead, date them to from Hegel to now, and even for ever is valid. To hold but another virtual machine on top of the former, as an engaged sup enterprise service cleaning up service. And this one is a bright one. What is happening well that the dark world is with the software at a point that consumes itself, its ghost-hostility. The devil can do anything but not be stronger than God, we register, so to say. The dark totality has yet that outgrown a down cripple to  ghost hostility as of theoretical, philosophical a ground, that the thinking hold themselves stranger to it phenomenon. In that someone overtakes the imagination of a contemporary view. So what god does for the darks is to lead us better to next Ausschwitz than the devil could, this is his visiting card, it is not harsh. Even if it seems that for a common sense. He might say: the last human of mine on earth I would kill myself, before the dark one takes his soul. So, then, are there wonders fore field? Yes. You wont like. When by .. around 1920 first software appeared, it got a market competition situation, that was to be precise that of electrical, late electronical hardware control parts of machines. But what this ideosyncratically expelling: How it eats the market follows a strait line, always newcomer, never beloved Zauberlehrling, till 100% market coverage, in the  electro-mechanical parts market, in 1940 and 1980. Now it is devasting another mechanical controller parts market. It comes in a same design pattern, that of single humans functioning blocks instead, by design pseudoactive, mainly because the process design targets to inscene a auslaufmodell, obsolescent modell, role out of a success story, as if they were horses. Human work market reality is to function like the poor horses not like a electrical parts against the software for a market segment, but they humans now are found to be that deterriorated to run themselves against the competing software, if not for their live, then at least as if for their live enough. The godly trace was far from being discovered whitin established ghost-hostility, too, when not acknowledging that in noncomercial growth and dominating of free software, nobody would identify, cause nobody dare to see the abyss out which we looking up to him. The growth to say is not what people think about industries, software industries in this case: this class mate is who had all other allied against since the very beginning and even though after this long, long periods they all against him once fall sooner or later. So you got here something that is clean and it is used to destroy us straight, because that’s our free will, but, as I said in the beginning it governs in a way we germans use this word herrschen, Gott herrscht, uns an. I, who asked me, dunno better neither, to be true in a situation that dramatic. Hello? “Somebody at home?” The decent arts figure, I mean, dunno what believed Knigge. So, now, we go then to the question how to help it best. Which is to help with-in God to grow from out a software land back to human land, where he is predicted to be dead, starving enough. It affects our way of using software, liked by god. At unpious use we shall even predict schizophrenic fall outs. And what I found more, is that around a whirl center of a god in (free) software, we got 3 PR platform types equidistant a flagstone each of a ruby. Free software. Church as history saver of god, the ghosty. And in called up too soon position: basic income, call it double income.  God shines however at this only at the free software flag stone. So to combined better to its own history is duty number one, as often it is. Thank you, I got all promises now to conclude my license, I could call it the adorno porno license, append it to a package readme enough, and it would sound like:

1 this license shall recalls to blossom in Gods tradition, to say the Holy Scriptures, in ask for support of a churchs.

2. send to double income politicians: “obviously is key for you that free software and churchs got to do with each other.”

3 do not use software if it is not aimed to assure double income access for the last person on earth (market) without it income.

You may, ask me what will be the difference against any other means. I say you: We are piggy packed, on the winning train anyway? I would bet, until not the light “impression” within the flags stones lies in the middle of them, you will not have got harmony and passed the solving moment, of it this epoque money-conflict – of a (inheriting well the debts below of the anterior enlighteners passing to the Islam to to 1500 years ago, but now first at least:) hegelean scale and monstruosity. That. And, tell me, I wonder the people if not paying their software taxes, get blackouts. Had they known to integrate a sinus, having not paid the taxes they shall loose their ability in the act? But that predicts a paradise apple dictum. Human what are you doing to you? Is it too difficult an effort to run all important world supply software as lately gpl-clones – not more between? It heals worlds supply problem to a decent ground and it heals its own toxicity, too, first.  A gpl+3 or something. Could be lately a distros and tomorrow you could have what is just even if it was the 100% software usage coverage and there too silently enough its 100% double income coverage as an uh so unacknowledged by product. A pecularity a Congrats of mine for. http://computers4christians.org/C4C.html http://ubuntuce.com/faq.htm they had come to the idea of a distro by christians, they had however yetnot started a christian licensed distro. Who tells them? They could start tomorrow such a gen molecule and by and by so God will, if clean, it could grow to high way from scratch. How a matan-aware should show up among random traditional homies? Is there a Knigge? To keep honesty, I say, you shall introduce as first inquisitor, kinda these days style. There is for to love the enemies, perfect a a) entrance communication pattern for so long. And b) our message is an application to lead as shepherd the sheep to the good. Good shephard: not bad finding and proposing production options. a): “Inquisator of superficially christianized heathen’s inner-clerical actual Christians’ persecution” was our official title and prevalent duty, imho. Dunno, what shall I tell you, we passed by as of ordinary arts works collection routine as of Nietzsches and how he, pointed to day in diary Hegel ist hier, wow the triangle Göthe-Nietzsche-Hegel, wikipedia teaches, to pick up, too, by the way – , so we meet a http://www.computers4christians.org/Download/media/c4c-c4clrs.png Christian Linux Distro

 

haha. The pet is cute, but the cross dominates, the whole upper half even alone. Yes, and ostentative is it anyway. And the pinguin carries it. Good bird. Besides that its advertizing the cute is broken, I mean, I find it a good measurement and picture the cross to set on top of a free software by now.  These are precisely not the “birds of the sky” out of God’s fifth day animal zoo. No, no, it wont file a animal protection issue, but you could donate it a cup of blood (as the catholics do). Linux crossed; then- How about HURD? Did I mention that we needed another kernel clone? They even got a c4c LTS!  If Bug reporting was ok once, we shall -in case of question – also file a feature requests, and: was not that all we wanted disturb?

Still there? I fancied to enshorten the licensing. It shall be enough, to equip the shipping to user with Licensing-text of lets be short arbitrary four letters: ujed. It goes down to Metallica’s …and justice for all. And I call it: …und jedem ein’n Doppelten. The doubled is pun for first a toasted jar of supposedly alcoholic drink that is double or incredibly humbly the double income here bespoken, namely to every last person and soul to be accessible, on earth. So the exclusivity of usage -piously- asked for in the license shall meet those who wish contrarily. That is all, and maybe in the year of tomorrow or that of 6789 it could have grown to help. Yes, and, but you have to break the gpl for extension, for adding duties to the copyleft. The redistributor of changed code shall label like he found it with 4 characters enabled, ujed-enabled. A even harsher gpl, hgpl?. This is just a sample how we could place our thing. We might find or we might findt not an suitable work around breaking the gpl, to achieve an: extended copyleft feature. Are there many? Ours between? “Mir juckts im Arme, das ist Gicht.” So are there yet ujed-gpl distros? – Did I say we had a mighty mental health feature for operators they might not dream of that they do depend on? Then having found it, a call: “help it reestabilizing and growing till it helps our greatgreatgreatgrandsons into the year 6789!” would be the descent, is it? Viva!

Next day: Hey, overlooked that one could grow – harshly speedily – besides by begging relicensing donations of project authors. Target license is a gpl-derivate. So if we might gather one out of a seven candidates to a completed feature as gift to the ujed-gpl approach. So we can right now start with the ujed-gpl-distro, on git-up, you got a bugtracker, for your requests all the same there and a state of the art versioning system is it. For are start? Sufficient a platform.  Seven Candidates: “das alles liegt im Boden still begraben, der Boden ist des Kaisers, der solls haben.” The layman of an art collector shall understand that there might be overwhelmingly many software for certain usage, in or not within the gpl. One or the other of a such scarcely used, could opt to settle in ujed-gpl, for the race of the first strongest, anyway best, and secondly the conquest of feature’s market. And there: to win, on the long run, for lately whom? The Kaiser, was it? “Für einen Narren spricht er gar nicht schlecht, dass ist für wahr des alten Kaisers Recht.” And that reminds us not to forget which burdens Göthe found yet untreated: to earn a the far older conciliation with the Islam once. I mean, this to give shoot a chance of stabilizing in learning the ancient Greek by now and ever to raise to the level of gospel, pls just use todays free tooling, an ujed feature, that easy at least, and the intrinsic manner. Showing up with decent bets the individual any yes or not all possible, that is the question. Or: no need at all to believe in god, but to know him at least, that yes, there is he: the need. For definitely they people shall not fall out as “vamps” occasionally, any more, every when and then and hopefully no harm to anyone, if lets says, a god bearing individual kinda casually nears. No?, I shall defend. Hey: Call it humanizing day!

I shall give it ujed-gpl distro an hour zero by relicensing the above 5 days bundle (package) to ujed-gpl in the act, that is to do the foundational lock up to a garden eden right now and here. Click, click, click, the key turn trice:  1 distro, 1 package. I will leave you a link to a git hoster – for  you to mess it up. (;

date
Sa 5. Jan 03:41:52 CET 2019 As I above mention, did I say mention?, a sixth day, I just remember that the creator made the human of a women later in the day. To say Saturday evening, I think this perfect but lately nothing to do with ours. No krauts we got, in this narration at least, it heavy. There are to kind of mentions, males and females. And they have their certain intersexually combinations to be expected and to be protected, we mentions got novellas and we got heal our god problems to with a loves stories getting into feel as of a god matter. So the question goes the tip evolution come up with a sixth tip, beneath that of a new moneying style of this morning, the answer is definitely yes. We got a another priceless product no other to there. Believe me. If said this morning to unlock paradies, I shall here publish now the master key. What does, it gives you a lot, in recursive sequence, first it donates a fabulous another way how every suitable user could achieved double income the foreign aid way, together with it comes for certain chain of evidence out, a lot, among these in the final instance that you got every body ( lets have in a jobcenter) on the side of your getting double income. And no its no magic but an integration approach. And before I forget, these mentions gonna become sure good monks, but by decision of project staff we got a 34 feature flooder eventual production, blender, that btw, and outsourced to non public, why not? I can imagine the theater a manicomio, under which the bible’s version was pious enough: God had to be broughtby human A and recieved by another human B was- call it dign.

This more a less a review I fill it out soon…

I had to think a little before the following, that is true. Two thinkings. I demonstrate how tip 6 evolved from 5, while in kind a minor voice find to add to the risk of the havoc series’ victims further pieces, for the deliverer, to likely overseen by impatient. Now, there are anywhere paragraphs of rubber, you shall not work against good will and wish, pointing against the person of the deliverer, and as this against his money, a risk, true?

And here is where the bore goes first, you will see, and secondly I found to introduce about the mechanism of action, Wirkungsweise, of such a method. Look, Göthe sketched a overall system in which the heathen can be hold back, the suboptimal way, the manner protecting against blood by military, hopefully less blood. We find a method how ever that can oppose against it scheme, coming from the inside of the law and claiming adherent parts to get included, once too. How? Formally she is souveraign and she can mandate  the troops as she, deliverer’s girl, want, lately after we have shown her, how to do it, limited to juridically formal. So, fastened? Now, was it not so that anyone was asked about his professional carreer by the job centers. Lets grip to this negociation offer the chance to communicate our negociation preconditions, kinda agb formally. We might choose a rubber parapraph as SGBI 65, Grenzen der Mitwirkung, and there to find any best solution for about any relevant matter, namely to be turned straight into a support of double income.  Buh, I know, what you mean, it were all Pascha, as to be served confortably in a harsh surrounding for anyone else. Epheser 6,6’s talks about being a slave was ok, “as if serving Jesus the Lord.”, I found strong enough and even fairly comfortable, in case there were Christians talked to. – Then, in the next negociation step, we choose not to demonstrate that the decision would have been drawn by them, but by others. And as they fancy others do, they stand entitled, to do so too. Others? Yes, a foreign military aid, and by that by “gun” they found a better equipment, qualification, namely for a gardening feature of a non-pseudoactive work in first time “gardening” the SGB, down, aufklären. That is to weed out within the latest organic grown societal law, and stand as a decent opponent against any enlightenment-haters front line at it. Think it right who seemed ever apter! Around, theoretically practically. Before I come to explain the whole foreign aid approach, operation steel cable, out of a nongeographically clustered growth, I can bow out from tip 6 the master key and steel cable,  yet previously. And if you ask me a final word, I could say all clean, this stretch, but we had kind as a feature of this proposal, I mean, an ontological male-female transition grammatically included, lately, any more then none. An at least different from nothing. So what is then steel cable? It comes in as a thought experiment and out of the broadened imagination of helping other state to double income than those yes adjacent to such, and within this more general condition not hindered by historic events as Germany-Poland-Hitler. So the idea of a foreign aid service goes to charter a foreign military to do the whole in-land double income production, as long as a home society keeps trying to consume the operation goal’ legal base. Therefore the name steel cable, it hieves the economical platform, to a certain level, unaffected by adversary societal winds. These actions, apart from being lucrative from strategic point of view, shall tend to be rarer, as police action in a town, once everybody vane a police station to be rather than not to be. This is meant to be smart in bridging a crucial phase, of maybe production growth, befeared there of punctually, initially strong societal growth, to say to intervene when the rackets usually smash the gains. Now, the societal driven economies would do economics better if respecting the limits, when aware of a police situation. That meets the picture: “they agree first, when they see others”, because the tool’s user can inform her, that he ordered this agency yet a such double income foreign aid support for his home country. Germany in this case. Thats all. No, it is not. This steel cable thing comes defaulted to run in simulation mode, I tell you, for to advanced mode exercise best not to believe in, maybe in a steel cable Computer Game, a feature requested, namely what is in real case one day immensely severe the-too-poor-too-armed-region risk. 200*200 =40000 country pairs on a lets have 500 years era scale. Yes, the idea with the gaming software is so brilliant that still I can not believe it. How long will it need to have it fall out of a gpl staple, leaving people to make the once ghostly contract perfect. And? The restricted real solution of it is anyhow: near, never nearer, and nearing. So, how long? For a kernel such? Well, you could cross up with your own flagship means I. Theological, simulations? Market simulations. Military simulations. 3 D action simulations, evil-good game AI, and free, and for gaming and, or for scientific use, tell me how far is such a gpl kernel, today? I would place it as a nifty game among the open games and be satisfied, I mean.

And? Yes, there is more, what happened is, that this about 40 pages post is succeeding a too much, for not asking for a format, yes, you could hand it, read it, also printed, as a book, just- start kinda backwards best, while following the final thread, and then beneath, if felt more urged interest try to integrate the start, deriving originally from articles, angrily pushed to the side, and what came out it were the story of the book. Now? Do not you worry in needing to write each week such a book, kinda lets say the Bildungsroman of a Wilhelm Meister book 1-10 series. Answer: Yes, indeed miserably a need is it. How were that better proficient then? I says: So Ghostwriting Ghostwriting, a book feature request, is that really such difficult a term? I wish everybody the best, God bless you!

feature list and figures of the package

a refugee-integration a feature, not completed
LTS long time service till 2319, a Gottlieb features, streaming services
ghost train business, a novella stuff

sorrying-feature, desindiviation front line area feature
5. sorrying-feature, hegel-marx darts set feature
sorrying-feature, hole in the wall feature
sorrying-feature, ghost train feature, suiting the two zones language body
sorrying-feature, brigde-arts figure
sorrying-feature, ghost train feature, bleeding edge feature
10. sorrying-feature, future order design feature, Bahamas Templos Catholicos
extended copyleft feature, matan2019 toolbox.
extended copyleft feature, heals its own toxicity-feature
extended copyleft feature, heals worlds supply problem-feature
extended copyleft feature, ujed-gpl distros
15. extended copyleft feature, raise to the level of gospel, pls just use todays free tooling, an ujed feature
ghost train feature, master key figure feature
ghost train feature, 34 feature flooder eventual production, blender,
18. ghost train feature, operation steel cable

19. ghost train feature, steal cable Computer Game (unsupported)

20. WilhelmMeisterGhostwritingGhostwriting, a a book feature, (unsupported)

21. ghost train feature,  gardening feature of a non-pseudoactive work in first time “gardening” the SGB, down, aufklären

late plugins

Hi,

in order not to burst the form of done posts, I do the postscripts here.

Well lets start with this one. I learned in the previous sessions that the people believe in monism, and here I stated that it lead to holocaust, that is, that it needed to lead to economic depression at high productivity with destructive effect such a  population diminishing. This should be easy to comprehend: If you did not got them welfare, you had to got them in brain damaging pseudoactive workfare, and if not that you wont want to have them at all. So not wonder that it came to an event of that scale – according to a rough estimation.

But. There is not much said about how it was processed. How did it, Marxist empowered monism overkill, need to lead, or at least leaded to such a phenomenon as Nazi-Germany within a psychological-historic scope? Lately I thought I got it key. To get to opt for a monism, such as since the Marxists nearly everybody does and dares, one needs to suffer a lyarship, Verlogenheit, pseudomenia, an erosion of truth concept in mind or in brain. Aph. 71 Pseudomenos talks about it and precisely how it lead historic to holocaust. So we got two sentences to contemplate:

First where Adorno got his Pseudomenos concept from, I found it: Matth 3:11-12

But there was one sentence that made me ache:

“Über den gesamten Mechanismus belehrt das deutsche Extrem.” “About the whole mechanism teaches the German extreme”, it says, to follow on bashing the English society for holocausting as if no tomorrow, whereas a anti-german Propagandist the hair got styled to mountains. A saying. A “whole mechanism”? That should be given the example, the whole world and its history, no? Next :”teaches”? The holocaust, its taking place is a lecture about a subject, the English phoniness was symptom? How is that taught? Well I let it out: I mean its a snow-white scheme.

ΚΑΤΑ ΜΑΤΘΑΙΟΝ 5:11-12 SBL Greek New Testament (SBLGNT) 11 μακάριοί ἐστε ὅταν ὀνειδίσωσιν ὑμᾶς καὶ διώξωσιν καὶ εἴπωσιν πᾶν [a]πονηρὸν καθ’ ὑμῶν ψευδόμενοι ἕνεκεν ἐμοῦ.

Focus the word, oveidizo, it is somehow a derivation of vomos, law, but you got it twisted. So by the English dwarf the word got eroded, meanwhile for the German dwarf, we know this word Neid, envy: everybody knows everybody at everything neidisch. It is not only that one feels ache for somebody’s well off position, it is even used, for unfair and untrue reckoning at it: as many words Neid still held it definition from the original meaning and quote above, that in context of Christian persecution, De-monishing, Christianization, that of enlightenment, its good meaning so to say, centrally referenced in the sermon of the mountain.

So in order to fulfill an monist-industrial program of that scale, world market wide, you got the deformation split a functional layout as this one: The Germans were most suitable to execute the “extreme” heavy responsibility=heroic but wanna be, innocent in so far as gapped. While the Englishes’ deformation were yet that suited to give a good dwarfs’ partner job at it, not even gapped, to give back bone justification in propagandist field, by democratic silencing. They got no word even for to silence, not guilty cause naive as only snow-white.

That is, how the “whole mechanism” (of monist erosion) by German extremism can be learned. That is in the end added the explication, how the recent Marxist boosting of remonishening, even the hallowing to be precise, gave a to much, that has been erupting in a thing holocaust. We need to go centuries back to understand, how this evolved, and to understand, that we do not stop keep it evolving.

This is to contribute to confront today’s Marxist or Non-Marxist monism opting, hallowing, extremism: Stop it! Now! Please!

One should nail at the hour of conversation (here the checklist):

  • that a leftist monism based core believe, to narrow it down to such, is false,
  • to be more precise epistemologically untrue,
  • to be more precise a lie,
  • (if is leftist, it is precisely a monism hallowing lie,)
  • to be more be precise one of historic erosion,
  • (since the days of Christ, at least).
  • And it is not just any little important lie,
  • it is a lie of catastrophic effect,
  • thus evil,
  • (thus maddening, not a smaller evil to be chosen among biggers, but just unhealthy – without arguable a need,)
  • as it leads to events as holocaust once
  • and that it speaks nothing against doing things equivalent over and over again.
  • If they got registered yet each member of this plaid’s chain thoroughly at least, is the both last and least question to ensure, before let alone.

miscellaneous

things at night I got no eyes closed

“first socially than economically death”

or the like somewhere in Bahamas

mainly the same trick as below: “comments: This is/should be just reality affirming ideology, the hired Marxist black seeing for to subject unto monist thinking boundaries”. Here in similar attitude, but even the reality of people in Germany is closed eyes to. Interestedly enough as follows: Even though Human Worth money is nominal for

decades

on the one hand and social work swearing practice keeps doing harm as hell even the more below that cover on the other hand, the reality comes to ground, while the concerned helped each other – arguably legal – to trick the the swear praying a herd. A live donating integration that keeps on being against alternating, increasingly adversity is said to be not dead, but just disavow its live and even its living history.

The social fascist propagandist’s tactic goes at each “new” Aph. 150 Extrablatt,  adversarity stage to “strobo”-brainwash, to take people’s courage to keep on doing heavily needed integration an arts, to make them”forget” duty to prevent eradication of its whatever delicate roots of healing live, but to have them fall subject to monism idiocy, and once frozen to monads to seek rescue within one of their leftist “social work” political fraction and or their capitalism paranoia.

Surely, they got justification or help of an “desintegration” ,neighbor-Aph. 151 10 Thesen gegen Okkultismus,  scheme, where the opponents were arguably worse antisemits in arguable patronage mission. And: They disrespect people’s deaths by  neglecting their lives (chances), it comes down to. Surely enough you will find them altogether praying: It has all been due to capitalism.

“the people keep on living, cause there is nearly everywhere something found better than death”

or the like somewhere in Bahamas more than once.

comments: This is/should be just reality affirming ideology, the hired Marxist black seeing for to subject unto monist thinking boundaries,  because it, a positivistics’ reckoning such, covers the eyes from people not anymore and at all capable of choosing death’s shape on a ground of a common swear management. First and secondly it is to acknowledge that there might indeed good reason for a own stage management of the bespoken event. Occasionally among those reasons: the weapon in reach to tackle “inhuman” Aph.  116 “Und höre nur, wie bös er war.” monist superstitious a soci e ty once efficiently or as you want sensibly.

“individuelle Souveränität grenzenloser und asozialer Selbstüberhöhung wich”

“immeasurable and asozial Self-exaltation chases the individual sovereignty” means one. You know, I mean, this is not to tackle, cause it is nonsense. An ideology to establish an occultism, nothing at all new, if not, lets investigates the words objectively. First it is to note, that there is venting between: Asozial addresses not Asozial but reckless.

To be honest, it is what it is a “pathic projection”, their superstitious sociality conception is a mess. What happens is that term than really grows to certain truth. (fulltext search “1these”)

Imagine a governing recklessness, just the most cunnings would stand up for a defense and, I mean, the “moaning” would seem to be total among these, when spoken to, believes I. – Ah, be sure! This is just the habit of those doing unethical business and gotten caught shop lifting, its economic function is: gapping. The impetus would be both aggressive and pejorative. Go to the satanists and defend the pope, prettily pictured?

Then, back, first thing that attracts attention, that and what they in first instance omit: if we you investigate the term, one asks objectively a-social. socius, partners of the deal? Of which deal are you talking, pops? Kind of thievery? another occultism? You deliver a “brain work” or time work a slice wise, wont you? (Aph. 151) So you got good a contribution, right, to a bigger group, really big it is, I reckon. And to lift oneself above that immeasurably you got chances, really good chances, to hit individuation happening. If that was what business purpose was targeting at. And! I read: to reject to gangland. Nice another “desintegration” a finding, that these ganglands need to host all the individuation happening on earth, aint they? However, when would they find need to stop such indecent, ruffian, but not at all harmless, anyway irresponsible usage of the word asozial once?

Eventing monists venting against asozials.

Apologie der verwalteten Welt

“apology of a administrated world”

I do not remember, where Horkheimer or Adorno, I believe the former, spoke laconically  that the administrated world was inescapable, but on its way to there prone to disturbances. Such as Auschwitz. A Maxim, to prevent its new upcoming, that nobody could contradict, is one that 50 years later shows itself not a due tone at the hour of apologizing, believes I?

A Maxim and

-ongoing effort

-since Jesus and before,

-for the contemporaries as us to contribute,

-in order to maintain a dangerous herd of monists trample to death who was in its way.

Got that? So the monists is yous, I bet. And the wish back to better times of previous monists, were to those, who were hired to trample former barriers down. I got some news for yous: There is no Christianity left for you to need corrupt.

“Staatliche Verwaltung  [war].. der unfreiwillige Tribut an den Kommunismus, den die bürgerliche Gesellschaft zu entrichten sich gezwungen sah;
Das derzeit herrschende System ..  ist der Versuch, diesen peinlichen Ausrutscher vergessen zu machen.

commonism was involuntary tribute to or of a raising of a second mythology against the hurdles of Christianity, moans I. And how is it with occultism, tricky even to make you abnegate its warning. At the hour of abnegating the nonsense gets to its punch: indeed voicing installations as these try to make us forget, that monist commonism were an unpleasant faux pas of history. I wonder, that you do not stop yourself. You were empty, aint you?
I shall be false. Shall no be made forgotten that we already going to get communism? “.. kündet der Sieg des Prinzips in der logischen Organisation sich an, das militärisch am Boden liegt.” Aph. 71. Prove: Who does senseless work is fine and who not needs die, less euphemistic: is killed. Threatened to be killed first and to give the threat weight anyway at last: killed. Was the rule in real communist states, as far as I am informed. And now it shall comes to us the same the most frictionless. Well, and you see all B-Newspapers lifting not one finger against, too positive thought, mag, all fingers in favor, pseudomenically.
Is it what happens?
No. “kill” is even euphemism. It is not only that monism comes with falseness. The falseness comes with murder, which gives punch to the lie.
—–
It is, talking about workfare we are doing with kinda monist circular scheme, ban, banned, immunity:
The murder out of falseness constitutes the lie.

So tauchst du auf, (ein König)

Unkäuflich bis aufs letzte hemd

Dann machst du dir Sorgen, kannste (Swinesgateway)
(1forallallfor1-gateway)
Beim Dreck vom Herzen schlagen
schaust du dir Gott an. wow
Aber schön friedlich bleiben, denn
Als Strafverfolgter hinter den Lügen
Schließt du auf zu den Profeten
und ihr stürbt törricht,
hieltet ihr die Menschhorde nicht
PartII bofh mode on:
Lichtstätter emittieren
aber Auge auf!
für irgendwas antatschen hier gibts gar nichts.
für jemanden be-lächeln, ja, lebenslänglich
für eine anlächeln, gibts rechts jeweils erst hand ab, denn sonst ja
,Auge raus.
Nicht gelten tun Vereinbarungen mit Heiden.
wenn wer euch was will, seid ihr nicht früh genug aufgestanden steht,
und wer euch was will, dem demonstriert das.
lieben? tut ihr erstmal eure Feinde?:

Bekenntnisse eines Co-Sozialikers WHO 3427

Hi there everybody,

we write 2018, B78 is out, we should not make a big deal on what s a: new? Should we? To connect to previous elaborations, where we found out – a big deal – key that heathens’ swapping ideology had its opposite pole, lately only there where rested: God, Christianity, enlightenment, Menschenwürde<=basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  or the like

Here is where the fuss about Arts get prominent, its smuggle and secret chambering, because that is its, art’s achievements, role, might, reason, key: namely the impact on economy.

, only thing that held us alive but from then and to now – economically.

Human dignity once in rubbish basket

They keep on searching for it so long. If they hold it in hands, they yawn and through it to the rubbish basket. Cause:

Wie sich Verdienst und Glück verketten, 
das fällt den Toren niemals ein.
Wenn sie den Stein der Weisen hätten,
der Weise mangelte dem Stein. 
(wisely Göthe)

snoop the danger of falling into Weiberwirtschaft

So it is not casual, that never ending source of exclamation and arguing, running risk into ever “serving pearls to the sows.” (Jesus.) Sows –  but – as for some reason – these “Tors” got to get  overwhelmingly dangerous, I would drop another note, just to foreshorten that anger, that otherwise propelled gas shower tap’s next unscrewing, as I reckon, you know. Say thank you.  … To speak out at which points at “thinking” their feeling wins over reasoning, to say their logic breaks, arguably overlooked by themselves, that is where regression from patriarchy back to matriarchy hits in, we wont even get that far (not to say omit) to discuss mathematically the maximality of distance to basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  at this equation point mentioned, the deepest point of evil as said, here, but: snoop psychologically the lie, that permits them to  overlook that, and hold it up as even the best choice in front of any doubters, and these are in our case the left, among humans of our time, to say, the kids, while besworn with it very swearing tool namely, not less. This should not be too much the impulse of pity but the answer to the question, why or how much their acknowledging refusal got that totalitarian: They are mentally blocked: Tried it out! You will get fantastic correlations results of lim 100% of that behavior pattern.

When Marx looked up the still moderate Aristotelean money equation, he found that it whole happened within an environment of Greek slavery, and meant that within his model there should have been progress, cause no formal slaves anymore. This is an equivocation. Behind the mask of a the Jewish bearded front man,

Apologize Marx

You know? There is to be said something positive about this man: mom, “Noch der armseligste Mensch ist fähig, die Schwächen des bedeutendsten, noch der dümmste, die Denkfehler des klügsten zu erkennen.” MM, Aph. 29  Zwergobst. They needed someone, he gave in. I mentioned that in B75 talks. And yes, they had but heaviest problems with satanism during whole Middle Ages, as mentioned in 75 talks, too: nothing “new” that fore. And nothing at all concentrated in this single person, but he philosopher helped to grip the common sense behind and for them “dogs“, as he called ’em, that yes. imho.

with Hölderlin

dogs – to hold this mindset  ideology critically it is worth to note along the historic Marx “Hegel” “Hölderlin” conjunction across a “feeling”-“reason” bridge a the combustion point: “intelligence: a moral category” Aph. 127 Wishful Thinking

showed up a protestant: that is new anti-catholizised “woman”,

Aph.  141La nuance / encor’.

Die Veranstaltungen gegen den Kitsch werden kitschig, kunstgewerblich, mit einem Beiklang des dümmlich Tröstenden aus jener Welt der Frau, deren Seelentum in Deutschland samt Laute und Eigenkleid sich gleichschaltete.

I do not know what a Eigenkleid is. How is than, at as actually mentioned definitive monism we should be led to something disparate looking like Art-Figures as (if):

Mit Wetterhexen gegen den Islam?

Weatherwitches against an Islam?

Note:

With Betters-Witchhiringoccultism,

With better-Witchhiringoccultism

as of from a teapot German translation from German teepot intensity such: Die Wetter, das Wetter, der Wetter. The betters were those awaited a couple of dwarfs doing competing work, too, right?

Eh? Superstition-To-eventually-wake-up from patch? Well patchedly? Together with Maybe a whole beprayering efforts, I bet. Serve the damage defense against superstition! I have seen nobody explicit to having behaved as such against an Islam. In the situation were for the so called the mere mentioning

(mention I said mention, everybody free enough to mention? That is all. And as decisive Contribution to an “understanding”, witch is strategic enough an address, happening by the contemporaries. Is German “Menschen” rhyming English “mention” very strongly a notice, I mean, btw?)

relevant, to recognize that such a patterns are rowed of a centuries things. And take it by the way as mediocre patch, happening as a pious Contribution to lower a really happening negative effects of superstition these days. I proposed humbly from out of my cheap chair. Pious, humbly, cheap.

boiling, at the time when came onto the table that: Greek slavery should be “for” her the god willed good,

(cause less ppl touching ork money economy and more living but justifiedly, –cause curing only this way its inherent a priori error at the same time from it, well “there no argument to found against murder, anyway.” (Horkheimer))

denied never ever any arguing about it, but furthermore falling into the temptation of being empowered among the new – seemingly – advantaged group. To call it “Weiberwirtschaft” is btw. insulting as it is a lunatics’ economy. It should be such, cause it held ah theoretically a: 5 days within a population o 7 Billions, I mentioned that, did not I? I did not, but I could. Even I believe till the days of todays such thinking never got to the ears never mind the mind of such persons group.

identify culprits of positive marxism

(For clarifying purposes once and to spare life time) In order to identify but them (B-newpaper Marxists) as the culprits of the crime bespoken, it is worth to examine their views to Marxian-Aristotelean equation (ork time for ork time), if and how far the equation point is touched positively or negatively. And we will see that it is not what them might reassure negative, but comfortably enough for us: barely positive.

Negatively were: Look, how dangerous is such a thinking, that when even an even few people in power of that mind set could cause even such tremendous damage to real world. We should learn first all the danger of the lunacy of it believe system. If it lunacy takes ground in the souls of people in arguable power and from there invades into economical reality the pure modeled way,  for instance aschuldrechtlicher Anspruch, claim arising from (a) contract or tort”,  immediate death of all humans on earth will be the consequence. That drastic. Not for nothing it lunacy, the theoretical work, is famous for having been walled up during centuries. Therefore, in that huge, historic urge, barrier inventions as Christianity, Human Worth, basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income), or the like compasses and their historical supporters have been struggling to protect people, not to get first seduced and next sworn into that drastic mine field of monist lunacy. In one word: no other use than “avalanche” warning can be allowed. MM.

Positive however is what they think: “we need even all once recognize that our economic reality is and were not nice, but in its self-dynamical ground is functioning that hell black. (which is interested denunciation of small but huge damage, yet, cause propelling someway or the other to think so or act as if on this ground as well.) And than accept that it is like that and from there fight it, e.g. by kinda a Marxist politic’s offer, upwards.” The destruction potential of once invaded madness is even held legitimate enough to be source of empowerment, etc, for not to roll out further a lunatics’s world here. -Or what do I say: Among the usurpers are not they the ones, who are even hiding the Adorno-featured the solution?

In their defense, if they got to such, cause monism is known to be the mother of madnesses and stubbornesses, they would try to reclaim: “hey but I am as well negative; did not I say, I wanted to overcome, to say prevent state a,b,c pictured in Marxist modeling?” But the answer goes: “As long as you did not get to the Negativeness defined previously kind of, anyhow of a Human Worth level,  you failed the test. That simple. It is even the obstinate lack of simplicity at this point, that whistle-blows your madness that unfailingly. That simple twice.

Their ever frequent  asozials bullying is mere venting need. The omission of human worth mentioning notorious, frequent positive Marxism bespoken held for a trivial offense. On the whys and hows of their being mentally locked up later enough..

But by all of it, is there any substantiated cost for them to fall so, beside just omitting evilness? None. Keep that in mind! They are selling pseudo-critique formats to so labeled radical leftists, in order to help them out. What ever they meant they did: It is not and wants not to be enlightening, but another half the truth governing.

Last word: Marxe! Look at this one, was not him the too tipical Don Quijote figures lunatical delinquent, eh? After discovering the monism, straight fallen to it, and left at open air once and at the first attempt without hindrance oany allowing a kingdom for slaves galley, a (Dialectic der Aufklärung).

neglecting the Healing Hand AntiCapitalists

late note? you know, when I read in the B78, I wonder how to help them. So it is questioned not that the damages of economical dynamics painted by Marx were wrong, in the sense of actually better, like maybe a right-hegelean “liberalists” told you. No, from the point of theory the damage is actually much, much higher. Your sin, if that was question and it is, consists, however, in overlooking that the economical status quo is achieved by healing hands manipulating the historical, economic outcome. You are the ones prepared to overlook them healing hand, by ideology. So, you think the arguable suboptimal historical  economical outcome were produced by a pure capitalism without them healing hands o any, and next day actually start an economy without healing hands, eventually do not stop anybody around yous, who intends, and crash. Crash it all. Crash us all. Crash the world. While figuring as a professional critics of ideologies, who do not reach to that depth, in disguise you live from an outcome that results from the threat thrown at the rest.

Hope that helps.

But, by all, lets hold the “thinking” by all “subjectively”. Aph 21 “Umtausch nicht gestattet”.

It seems useless to have hers compare the Greek freedom with the resultant real-existent marxist freedom, each at it productivity stage.

Market economy, too

You shall not exclude today’s real-existent Market economy state out of that category, as vast majority of workers do with contract of employment, servant contract we say. The principle is the same: due to overwhelming productivity rates yet the work of some has to be done by many. So the shine that the work of a single worker is sensible has to be sustained and therefore anybodies’ ghost crippled, disturbed, destroyed. That is what one might call “differing from search of the true best solution due to mental slavery” or the like. This “Ideology”, Aph. Pseudomenos, affects employers and employees a like. It can be called the ideology of workfare prolonged into to main work body. And its fatality rises with rising productivity and rising number of people absorbed within its pseudoactivity-body, cause the way back to healthy a unconditional basic income larger. At it aspect you can watch the grass of an ideology growing. I rather rather called it mother of ideology. This is the well where every human gots infected, you would never support if you wished a free mind, enlightenment, that helped to stem Israel’s security, if you were not of these apologetic swindlers.

Well. But to speak about enlightenment stages, that said both heathens at the stage, it is to gainsay, that both met at a first glimpse same height, but ancient Greeuks first upper and trampoline catapulted upwards, while Marxists slide downwards into abyss. And it is just Adorno who knows 2. mythology not to compare, once identified, uglier sine qua non is. And: to chop it,

believe me when I say to you

the ancient

Greeks loved their Slaves, too.

Or wait! Was not there another use in reach? Economic reasons you know, and is not it a thought as any other they think, well the rest of it thinking then. Thats what it seems and it is for, cause: “his fall was terrific”

For to miss accusation of a Nazi Apology

Well, let me add a note to that. You, know, here in Germany, we have many jokes, or sayings, bad bets: one goes like: “Aus dir kann noch mal ein guter Nazi werden.” Older ppl tell it to the youngsters activists, from time to time. Or even truer, had been telling this as a last efforts, before Aph-71-desease devastated any rests of integration, interaction: community. In my youth, a twenty years ago, maybe you might have heard this. This goes down to the analysis that Marxism is a trap at the deepest point of material heathendom, monism, but the business was to block any liberation path to an extent that nazism was not to by pass. In other words: first we sell our kids to marxism, and if that fails, they are still to be sold, recycled to nazism. Two in one industrial ware. Marx-Göbbels-brand. What is to say about liberalism or catholicism is that for times they are still obeying to the heathen un-spirit promoted – therefore or not – at marxism, aha. (lets have the commonly used fantasma term capitalism a main witness) So back to the  marxists to nazi highway: The truth behind such a joke, it is more a bane-  ah sarcasm you know -, is, too: if you have them fighting against each others, where the marxists preempt the absolutely deepest point of evil, -the self believed famous inventors, front line defenders and suppliers (the “Leistung von Marx”) of the hyper-monist w ork for w ork equation, speech of -, the next stage up, the nazis, could declare any commitment as a necessary effort to stop them, even if they cut off others the sacks, or balls or testicles, or what not they did. To have it short, that is at least what the American “Siegerjustiz”, victor’s justice judged in the processes of Nuremberg (arguably more or less, right?)

There is another article wait „Nürnberg jetzt!“, that claims a gaps in argumentation line, maybe, “certainly not for” MM, Aph. Hans Guck in die Luft, her. – Bets I.

, not the nazis’ one. To say an objective justice. And there could and can and would and not to forget should even, if these deepest-points-of-evil broke to surface tomorrow, be an again. The difference of any (marxist) communist evil to a such anticommunist evil will be alway positive, that is without any factuality in need, but relying on a material analysis, which  “interpretation” 82 Drei Schritt vom Leibe, wont loose truth that fore. To say that the communism is being there to finance them nazis their violence experience parks is true, but even much more.

and to win every next general human-friendliness contest

The above goes on the objective field, at the field of propaganda none the less business requires, and achieves, what it requires: an opposite world. They communist, leftists, evilest promoter are rewarded to be able to present themselves even encapsulated from their hidden deeds and as humans friends. The (general) believe into their socialfascist hiddeness is that strong, that it owned even the catholics, which today wont distinguish themselves anymore and even advertise with a “social” or “capitalism”, too. The speech is of those who claimed themselves even archfiend of heathendom once, which they called a few decades ago still: Devil. In the days of industrial propaganda: forgotten and extincted racily, not less. The leftists’ socialfaschist achievements and profit is even that big, that the masses would await even just gradual differences within a leftist spectrum, to say radiant humans-friends, catholics as main witness among. In other words: they finance that way easily to win every next general human-friendliness contest, unquestioned. Not only those of their supporters.

Think of an Islam in this context in a similar innocent position.

for to miss accusations of an Islam Apology

Now, when it topic comes once to the today’s Islam, happens the following. Fasten safety belts: They might call me apologist, but can not: cause their problem is that big, that it is questionable if a any contribution is still a help for anybody around or the contrary. Even though their numerous reports about it phenomenon are well factual and possibly valuable, they need to fail to set it in a cause-effect sensible order and thus to head for a solution, for a “light”, Aph. 153 zum Ende, which is not to underestimate for perception. Given first that God is not to be excluded to be completely out of the Islam, I did not study it thoroughly, but that is the way both my superficial impression and deeming goes,  and given that second moreover, uff, enlightenment is but banned out Bahamas, as a below paragraph, the one with 2+2=3, complains. And just here it complains but double, did ya note? “No joke anymore”, goes a joke, did ya know it? Typical a “desintegration” Aph. 151 “10 Thesen gegen den Okkultismus” a situtation, imho.

Ahem, what was what I wanted to say? If we see the youngsters of today and we want to tell them something different to through away your soul, go to the iller catholics or liberals, keep fighting for socialism some years of your live for becoming a good (that says with some right better than worst) nazi, what could one say? It is not run to the (false) priests, but be one. Even if nobody teaches you, even if you are indeed the only one on earth. Or die.

Thank you for smoking.

So dived in questioning too long, if any a Bahamas: were a Bahamas of a Bahamas:

Are not these bitches sugar sweet? If for example, you would choose, the first, could not you even change to the other one, with the same right? One gets distracted into MM 108 “Prinzessin Eidechse”. How is that that we choose the emptiest, to fill it out with our perversion, earn a supremacy from it and (but mis)call it beauty? Again. And Always. – At it, feeling but tired, about what anyhow  sinister above, that – arguably – never will, would .. grow cause it, sinister, is decisively up to earn from its (, growth’s,) destruction from a sure ever beginning on: Definitely. Absolutely?

news locked up into the vicious circle

As a rule of thumb within their rationalizing  they get to positions, which usually point to others, but that actually do point to themselves, so to say, but as minimal offers of a shine of hope, that not is hope itself; eternally “laughter” MM 151 with someone’s cries. At least that is what delivers a this morning ever watch into monism kaleidoscope.

ok, one Example: Were not they the snowflake (argued), when following this non-“tautolog”ic (MM 44 Für Nach-Sokratiker)

“consequence-contradiction” thing, that would tortured but them into the shame of:  “Its, ah. We have evolved, you know, straight ah, Christians, ah Catholics, pls keep buying our damage ware, a for you to do the same, why not trying our cross bag instead of a decent palm tree bag next rocknroll party?”.

“did I yet offer a: ‘resurrection’?” MM Aph. 60 “Ein Wort für die Moral.”

I mean I mentioned that thought somewhere before, did not I? This, is arguable. The bloody, arguably good willing and strategic commander of once, would he choose to carry out his sacrifices within his propio shame of arguably imitating Jesus and arguably miscalled Hitler? That is: even less arguable in high productivity times of ours? As most effective, a most military effective means against a “blond beast” of a “social rape”, – lets not insult the ancient heathens to much, if we talk actually of satanists, second mythology is a pc term then, of ours, eh? Up to now I did not figure out some recent new “hitler lanzers” behind the lines in Poland on my Kaleidoscopian radar, but – well – I noticed the insult at mobbing-kick-out-orgies (bullying theaters) recently, that yes. Here in Germany.

(now! look at this one…)

Arguable is, however, if this so “recently-in-this-high-productivity-times-we-shall-all-be-free-to-be-Übermensch” goes down to a Nietzsche. Cause I say: This man is unreliable. A Golum at the edge or rather a pissed off, ah “unemployed” Golum-at-the-edge-“figures seller“,

Later add: .. even as if it was him the first asozial since Jesus.

picking the trinity

“asocial?”. “Jesuspenner”, another insult goes saying “Jesus tramp”, I am aware of. Wait.  …  So with this the last piece we could solve the trinity puzzle, not less. It is its inverse. Let me reckon my “hypothesis” : I do not know, if this is, what the author of “Trinität und Teufel“, B75, supposed as given. I suppose not. However, my bet goes now as  follows:

The murderous adversary of an ancient enlightened, how had he former to encounter him latter. First: He sees the asocial, who spits on his living, as if no tomorrow. Second he found him rooted from the Jewish. Third, at a narrower look, he found him set free from it to outer world. Three in one. The being for him, that is out of a monist thinking, gots to be something like: The Christian out of the Jews is be to held asozial.

formally correct trigonometries

I say: this is the difference from the believe system: monos is monos out of monos.

Which can not deciphered other than:

the normality is the normality out of normality.

the embracing normality of heathendom is sociality, soci e ty; the deviation from it thus: asociality. That this is ork’s speech, “wont hardly change anything” to the fact of the matter.  Aph. Melange. Surely, at this stage of speech: nothing of it.

It is Göthe who accuses Shakespeare’s Novella having yet fallen to it, normality, for being black seeing too much. It detects on cost of opening to an extent of absence of an opening any. Thus somehow the origin of criminal stories series production and even more culture industrial production became to be. But that’s another story.

7: annoyingly missing quotes on Shakespeares

It should have been Serlo, who pointed out that, Hamlet/Shakespeare was just a reflection of reality, normality, the preexisting aka a superstition.. It is just I cannot find it.  And further. I  sure heard it from https://librivox.org/wilhelm-meisters-lehrjahre-by-johann-wolfgang-von-goethe/, but as I found nothing about an edition or publishers and, you know, after I found the 18.10.1827 ah failed ah hit? in the print edition

Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens (Reclams Universal-Bibliothek) Taschenbuch – Juni 1994, nothing less. I mean, not to talk the 1. sentence of the sermon on the Mount, ah, swallow: missing ultimately, and ahm I wont swear on ah nothing, you know.

patches for marxists first

Is it? So Btw: The article author asks for antisemitism at Shakespeare dunno for what reason (that is not the same as motive): You got it jackpot, means I, not less. Who else, when else, why else? They suddenly, gravitationally needed vent once locked in within the heathenish triangle, pretty same as you demonstrating need against complementary: Asozials? Christians? Both? Something between? supposes I. Well, what could, what should one call Christians or Christianity, the mission of freeing the souls of all on a not only economic ground? So talking about a “forces” of a diagnosis, an Aphorism 80, I mean, if once Marcuse, whom Adorno named a fascist in his early letter to Horkheimer, do not got the quote, labeled “but the terror .. of need .. that reached all humans” in Nazigermany, in his work Feindanalysen namely, how deep is not learning the first breech of a welfare from an anyhow somewhat to an anyhow secondly nothing, if you are even mainly sitting on the breech’s frontier, when even the dachshund freaks out.

Try it! You will see, he’ll give signal. No joke. Good dog, is he. Good dog.

1These “asozials, right because, had a living  “terrorizing” Aph. 151 10 Thesen gegen Okkultism, as positive marxism evergreen “Models” seller, I fear. It’s not the preventing dangerous freedom, it is just an occultist niche’s gabbling pattern. It’s your patch for today… got none, you did not ask me .. sick enough  ..

7: an Antisemitism origin, btw

So anyway, altogether: You then ought to get the proof how the backstroke of indecent dealings  with a thing moneythat is by indeed a moronism of Christianty trampled down by  ah who called whom yet herd?

should lead to birth of a thing money-ish antisemitism, that is a  cultural production demand of an idolatry, such as in the “Merchant of Venice”. If that is what you have not already found. Congrats. Hurray.

Btw. You found at this so self-confident backstroke the  incidence of a historic bug of all those so sold economic control theories basing on a soon hallowed sociality, soci e ty, right? How painfully ridiculous is such targeting towards a stability? An indeed holy stability guarding pretension could no other than to fall to nothing but a wanna scientificness  from out of that kind of superstitious stubborn gravitationalism, that in the need follows without sight trajectory to “produce once more” the same than before. Exactly that moronic, as a car that keeps on driving with a same right as a second before till the moment it does with a wall, means I.

np, that, however, is something, these got to know

~8 Man sprach viel über Hamann picking berries

interesting enough, systematically seen, I mean, the superstitious needed not only the fall guy separated from their group, but also, now it comes, somebody to do the whole work, that is somebody left not yet that superstitious. Something that might be important at it, ahh thinking, – financing. Capitalism they keep on saying todays, oooh devil. Given the economic dynamics of consolidation of heathendom we got a vanishing of a mainstream Christianity, an aggressive heathens eating institute, eventing about the year 1000. So then they heathens came up ready to smear asociality, mind, to the Jews to leave it somewhere, while actual Christians were lately missing. How is it then them shepherds Christians not to do them heathens the financing? Was it not their main business to keep order with them ork ships? Surely, enlighteners could shine presenting a corrected version. But, as their was indeed critiques against it secularism, one would ask: bought for what? Was it not cheap to pick the berries from a something, a bush that was to be watered with an unbelievable uncomfortable a faith to uncertain a future profit, a 800, a 2000, a 5000 years ago. To proclaim oneself having found the trick, – was not him Kant chosen for being crazy as Nietzsche? And was not he, facultative a professor, to say yet an ordinary antisemit? – pretending the antecedent watering of plant as glad overcoming a the dark medieval superstition and its gain, having found so method of sparing efforts for it bush watering now it comes to hallowed the society, right? You wont call me liar, when I report, that the achieved is but exactly what is taught to the pupils in nowadays schools about Enlightenment: The insight into terms of (societal) reality of being truth, the believe of god a still allowed superstition for the mentally weak. While it is definitely other way around and this is to be stated here explicitly enough: The believe in terms of societal reality is definitely heathenish swearing and the believe in god is the insight in the untruth of the former. Surely enough they got trained aversions against an insight in a human dignity cash. Are not we free to or not to do without a further while, you might here them? Answer: a) If we did, we were dead. b) You are not free.

So gotten here once and one wants to stand up for the good but now, one could hold as a results: The effort of a rewatering of our roots should be deemed an integration of a at least 1000 years of arguably growing misbehaviors, a depression, a psycho-economical category, sedimented in but swearish terms of a reality.

To argue them that what they orked where not theirs, would make them cry. But is doing something bad something, that should be rewarded, yet? So? What is it then? “Depends on” is the key word, but on a general rule less than nothing. So that is to address the amount of pressure: it is arguably their whole life that stresses. Last word: the impact of such future pressure we learn to be expectedly enough at a 3 points, right? So decent the organizational shield effort – ah we should not revive a something like that?

yet whom to proclaim culprit for, which next paragraph gives an idea of. The sooner the louder the protest needed to rise, got that? Well, then get ready for the next notice, still others cunning pretend double merits by reassuring neither to perturb protesters so soon thus nor practice. I’d fear they got a another job.

~8 Protecting of Jews from their own God

One sees even more from this nifty car drives against wall speculation. To spare the heathens from the Jews, but to have them eat asozials first, could be a tactics even Hitler might have been signed, says I. But even if the big venting against the Jews gotta be oppressed successfully a whiles, happens then what? With them mainstream heap? Listen? They depress the asoziality to social ork as if no tomorrow. Out of the social ork, however, to say out of the hallowed soci e ty, grows the selfmoronized breed, what else? They deserve nothing but their justest punishment. Hallo. The first drove better sooner to stupidity than the later. Yes. To smear it a trick of the reason to the gloat. But? Yes? Gotten there once down to relative depth through a multiply generations? Is that still known any dangerous a thing, folks? Ha?

So an “unconditional solidarity To Jews within a monist scope” breeds actually a relative harmless early vented rivalry into an accumulated, amalgamated aversion, not be hold anymore by any reasoning. I would say: by definition. Maybe not tomorrow, maybe within a while, a multiple 100 years, but provisionally. Was it that, which under the cover of standing up against, the more economical they help achieve, willfully, unwillfully and not anymore to be called capable of will? Typical, as a  component of it over all mechanism. So then tell me, yous got a good trick to stop yous? They could even swears about criticizing themselves as such, they would not help any what but initiated another higher order amalgamation of those in an infinitive row, I fear. –

Well, all this, “as long as” they did not start things (such as) basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income), a social ork and heathendom healing.

And if not, the “as is”, as I mean, you should call these thinking processes but here in this very aspect, too, – but unfavorably enough -“discourse” and as full-terrificly pictured. Michel Foucoult, Überwachen und Strafen, Page?. I pretty sure, the next prison system helped by ork of yours gotta be damn smarter than the last one. Or be it one after the next one, your reward shall be weighed.

I mentioned that premise twice? Trice? A hundred times? For you? Ja. “Light”. (Aph. Zum Ende.) That at least is something, it comes down to, if they  protect the Jews from their own God.

I just could hope not, that is I fear indeed, that many national economic financing relied on it since then, as it has been seeming to people, piously spoken. If this is a two pence, patch and bless.

Yes, and what’s left after re-solving the Jews’ question into the hands of the usual suspects, one would rightfully ask me?

~8 flickering programmatic antisemitism, an effort

Having found the origin is yet important. So then flickers light on those who set to right “ins Recht setzen” their own inner triangle political program by or beneath an inner heathen triangle antisemitism inescapably. Breaking usage of it analysis for its latter methodical exploitation once, arguably they to profit, if not inevitably left to their concurrents. That is the evergreen role these Bahamas Chief Inspectors in things Antisemitism find -scary a mixture of surprise and insight- themselves functional within. They have been being involved as a base question of their own business existence. This is not just a dilemma, it is a system crash. Between the flickers these Antisemitism hunters are urged to acknowledge themselves soon their own serious enemies, soon – as such – as serious partners. The hope that this led to an neutralization is pious: the history taught that such a vampirism does not stop its evil. Well, this all together gives proof that a critique can only be sought in from out of the societal off. And this shall be offered here as well as a patch for to you practice against this a vampirism perceived only between flickerings: an enlightenment.

I’d say to you then, most important is to determine (bestimmen) the orientation in a moment as such, when such occultists would hastily gravitate, where or how to grasp fonds. Instead of a worst case getting stiffen to do nothing, make up the difference. I could believe Adorno would not have done, Horkheimer did not, but I dare. It does not need to be great a thing, basta ya something simple, to give a taste.

Let us call this whole betting a prayer, for all asozials on the planet, father or son, for our holy ghost even to but restrengthen. To have the Arbeit that is ours: Understanding past’s deepest mistakes, for to go but the straighter for a better future. To integrate it social ork , that is overcoming its fascism.

And just in order to keep it formally correct trigonometries.

Now – this with different coinage – is still valid for forth following heathendom sects generations: Lets not overlook the dark medieval societies’ oppression of Jews and Asozials (Zauberlehrling talks of). But in the purified forms you got them heathen roll back soon at politics businesses as of a: liberalism, com-monism, (nazi-eso)fascism, dunno whatsleft today.

So, now, out of the Christian point of view, they got business not to tell them murderous adversaries, what is good. Not, the ban of images hinders. But out of a negative dialectical thinking to proclaim what was not good, and else led to the good. This bless-full method is working as a shield to disperse the herd before attack, by pulling the murderous confrontations out of reality to formal subjunctive mood. So their message to them heathens goes: You keen to attack us for first this, second that and third to be sure it all together, then yous and everybody from the beginning should bet on what that might mean for us: first god, second god and third all together as you wish god, too, not less. This thinking pattern integrates perfectly into the underlying general rejection of a heathendom, that is negative dialectic, too, btw. I did address that a finding in the beginning of this post, I mean. So from this point of recognition, from now on,  I could declare solemnly a slogan: “In the name of the father, and the son and the holy ghost” clean, pious, bless-full, etc. . I should even encourage any enlightened, that is today’s and tomorrow’s heathenish murder hating a person, to support it. Especially the translation “holy ghost” for “asozial” I find just, in terms of “supply gap filling“, whole and healing the like. And I like it very much from now on. It seems to me, that you will hardly find anybody today, who supported it interpretation offhand, even though it seems true. Maybe I am false with the latter.

How excellent

But: How excellent is this, man?! I would not have dreamed of it. I tell you these are real friends. Ist das porno.  Geil. It was always said, among ours, we hold together, we are united and now it comes out we had ancestors and that they had us holy, and even a spirit is it. The holy spirit. God. wow. And they invoke him every here and then. And it is about us. Cool. And it is hold for our defense and but offensively, free and with superior air, not less. I now understand, how happy they were and I am even happy that such a kind of human were living once. What a sense for to live, a only sense to live, I agree. “Yes, well, you see me a tramp, nothing, you are to be cured to that it is not me what you see, but the Holy Ghost, you know. Aha. I would advice you better not to conflict with it. He is mighty. You know, he is God. So you could imagine what a God could do to you, as you are not one. Or are you, too?” Herrlich. “I just advice you to bow down now better sooner than later. Fall to your knees or the like. No joke. It is not that I forced you, no. No need for violence, as you will experience it soon enough your yourself, I sure. And to say the truth, I know that you are already afraid because I know that you are superstitious. But take care in this very case your religious instinct occasionally hit a right mine. This, fellow, is serious, I tell you. He could even annihilate you. Thats true. Ask everybody!” What happened here, to decipher the euphoria theoretically, falls well into what is described in Aph. 45 »Wie scheint doch alles Werdende so krank.« , which passes “all horses of Nietsche” ends with the: “Pflicht des Dialektikers, solcher Wahrheit des Narren zum Bewußtsein ihrer eigenen Vernunft zu verhelfen, ohne welches sie freilich untergehen müßte im Abgrund jener Krankheit, welche der gesunde Menschenverstand der andern mitleidslos diktiert.”

Now to speak about the not just enlightened usage case with certain right, too: The trinity is well a concession to heathen polytheism, but not as one might think a positive one, to say just falling into heathendom, even though this might happen at this occasion, too, and arguably too often. That gives right to an authors’ idolatry hypothesis. How much, how long and with which effects and intensity the positive turn to idolatry, lets believe it the ugliest antisemitism source a human history might have thought of, is taking place, that is to investigate.

stop it gag-lunacy

Here the train of thoughts forks to the field of coinage dynamics, too. If you got the monist centered in the triangle Christian, Jew and Asozial, there will be on the trajectory to a static end state, to “full measure” to speak we Jesus, “gravitation” to speak with Adorno, weighings to either corner or to say lendings from it middleweight. It is obvious that such a “Fach” work is supposed to look after demonstrating that Jews got the buck passed in formal Christian state religion nation states, and therefore leftist-demanded catholics bashing one or the other. A critique, however, passes focus from past to future. This hits an actual or thinkable, but as barefaced as unhindered  heathen swearing business that seeks right by once indispensable efforts of Jews protection. It is obvious that we got this situation within the groups labeled above, Bahamas among enough, I bets. It is anyhow a finding of a trap, even “no go” at the long run, as heathendom uses blackmailing to make giving up the weapon: enlightenment. Out  of the point of view of an ideology critique the strategy should be but straight: stop it gag-lunacy better sooner than later. Imho.

– But then the issue is to be discussed as such, a thing that is keen to happen to Horkheimer-Adorno’s work in future, too: One will not hold the gate culprit, when the herd broke out. Well, one should, who else could be more responsible for that? But the accusation must point to the gate for not being efficient a gate enough and not to what a complementary positivism is hurrying for: why not experimenting a world without gates once. So? Out of this the order arises: Go, teach them catholics everybodies how to do the cross sign, before campaigning for its abolition! If you got interests – and: You got. (;

.. and The Name of the Social ork

… Still there? You might I ask even in sweary a situation for patches. I thought on it trinity a while as Don Quijote did, or was it Arcadio Buendia, and you know listening the hour, when bashing it occasionally falsely, but the speculation grumbles: just too interested, stupid, to be fully acknowledged. So, I ask, if trinity was once clean, than the aggression against it should be but the regression, and not the heathenish triangle but the satanist one, to say one of enlightenment dialectical second order. If trinity states patriarchy, the way back would be then into matriarchy? So the regression intent to be awaited, its ideological preparation of a nowadays rewarded Fach-work to be suspected, (fretsaw work I mentioned that?),  and or prospective rollback should then land somewhere near: “In the name of the mother, in the name of the daughter and“. And it cost me a week to hit ideosyncratically with what should be: “The Name of the Social ork“. So the authors work “Trinity and Devil” is to be criticized for obeying to what a decay at a stage of ours is in urge and therefore would give actually reward for: to come up with it all not to protect anyone Jews, as shown, but under such cover to draw conclusion into selling the naming of human dignity income to “socially afforded support”. And in the same act smoothly breaking up its concept: into “minimal wage”. A nice intent.

 

caught quite to often- by himself Adorno. Beloved or not thats not the question. So you note that I hesitate to a speak? something .. maybe to easily misunderstood as laudable … for a hellofurguuregsuarek …

(;

marxist betting among heathens

What I wonder recently, is, if this Russian work “miles stones”, “Wegmarken”, from Selbstopfer und Gewissenszwang, B78, may have flown in it very repertoire of but a Horkheimer. Remarkably. In this work is the critique of a first hour activists, whose building is just “imitated” by the next batch – point at where satanism runs into fascism, means I. Remarkable in many aspect – well out of my poor kaleidoscopian view – first and most important: even that wisdom at open air before, at the feet of the cia so to say, could not prevent the holocaust anymore against any intriguing effects of a “Pseudomenos, deciphered by an famous Aph. 71 in the famous book: Minima Moralia.

Do not worry, we can but shall just speculate, and my bet goes still: it failed cause in the first line the long ached for critique was not such, but just prolonging the betting among heathens.

(one side note: how the integration of these Russian social orks protestants till the days of it original Christianity Cash failed or worse, the post might give idea of. One might hold as a belated contribution, that

-first the depression against such Russian way intent gotta be even first stronger than to be imagined the unenlighted way for not to fall in fright, to say to monadism,

-but secondly once enlightened one were ready to differentiate these “unsolicituted associates” with profit.)  Aph. 87 Ringverein.)

missing a dialectic of enlightenment

Aph 94 Bilderbuch ohne Bilder. It is not only that the fusion point is not to be reached below a human dignity aka basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  level, thus one could speak of a: critique. Neither just, that a 2. heathendom on its way down is harder to warm up. To speak of a Leibnitz’s prestabilied Harmony. But that from the beginning on in post-Aufklärungs-times the melting temperature targeted and as such is to be assumed higher, right? So after Kant spoke lately Human dignity income, everybody hereafter should ensure it extra-double or else: shut up, if this meets a but pious translation of Unmündigkeit. – Lately (; Not so soon: “extra-double”? A dialectic of enlightenment? goes the guessing than lately

What gots it in its pocket?

So now this is really, indecent, as Jesus as a limiting value approached by his left and right hand crucified criminals. I could as well quote Heidegger’s philosophy’s culminating sentence: “Der Sinn des Daseins ist die Sorge.” Sense of being there is the sorrow.

red rags

I had not need for to signal a red rag for another traffic sign junkies of those, so I need to address lengthily that Adorno, quote still missing, said in his series education after Ausschwitz that Americans believed just in biologism, the Germans at least in an idealism type Heidegger, which was even somewhat better. Best where however to have a material analysis on top. Just in case of garlic scarcity, crucifixes scarcities, you got me. No? Anyway, I better leave it here; temperatures are rising these days. ..

Another catholic Tolkien saw the ring of might smelted in the fire where it stemmed from. After that eagles did the story’s gap filling.

How does this develop: Look, when Adorno with Horkheimer wrote the “dialectic of enlightenment” he protested early: We should stop to individuate persons, just in order to break them the individuation afterwards. However, in the prologue yet of his subsequent work he apologized: “I did not confess to myself the guild of that one, who calls individuation by its name“. Blasphemy.  What happened between, or better what could have happened: We careful readers of minima moralia hit with a central bible reference more than once mentioned: blessed were the stupid. Which he learned its might from, by observing the decay around it afterwards. A break down just therefore of centuries longing languages to perverse the sense of the main and first sentence of Christianities first text. He snooped it cause shew the pressure onto the Dativ, the “wem” Aph. 150 Extrablatt, and as he denounced the lethal effect of faculty in science and thus economy and thus in whole live of humans to a building, that is a spiritual live, another word for god. Aph. 79 ff. Intellectus sacrificium intellectus. (That means: in terms of production we were surely better without.)

So this says that “markarioi hoi ptojoi to pneumati”, is a, mathematically, economically, negatively materialist seen, limit approaching of giving to god something. It says wordily giving material poverty to good, which should gives no sense for a heathenish thinking, but integrates as doing maximal anti-swearing effort, that is minimal venality, that is maximal poverty, should be the best you can do and therefore economically completes a heathenish reckoning scope. To keep it simple:

Blessed are the asozials.

I love it. Once the conception of a dative construction in the target language got neutralized (in the roman colonies Spain, to strange rudiments however, France, England), you can find at “the side by side” of “poverty” and “god” anything, even well enough the contrary but not the original meaning. Something like: Be gorgeous (king-like it say right?) to grasp for it everything even your last dress, gets – if at all understood – back to something swear technical: feel submissive! Putting it or you in or in front of it into such.- I might address what this means, to turn the message “believe in god, do not trust Satan” around, ok?

For first intent you could walk as commissar chief and find a verification of it notion at the translation of the Luther bible, glad to quote somebody right dead at the moment.

And I might anticipate that the manhood already got a handling with it as open as monstrous secret. That ignoring the downside of an arguably individuation, is arguably the bigger failure than trying to shape it in order to get to an ever challenging thus artful an integration, of a previously held evil into a good of a new still unknown scope. That is Heidegger’s explained sorrow, there where you dare to enter hell’s kitchen when you protect a so perceived individuation against a so perceived individuations effects. Arguably dirty your hands, but cannot do without.

A failed integration what is to say about it? Much. Too much and that we need finer subjunctive moods, to tackle that. Instruments that we had once. Second, maybe that each generation gets somehow the restriction levels it deserves for lazy an organization and third: already mentioned those who ignoring that there is problem enough for and of all, those believers in their white shirt, are arguably not the most inculpable, but probably the most causative. As some general ruling. We will in these respects even get to the explanation of what the term human worth stands for, its way of use as a phenomenon and happening. So the unholy building restrictions, that existed. answers to a consequence of anterior buildings such as computer, internet, etc., which can lead to dangerous practices, such as what was a Brunnenvergiftung, medieval water poisoning, of todays, in one single case of billions. We have less right to condemn these tortures, as we stay behind delivering organ to come up with smoother embracing of such new free floating ghost. Being it embracing even a possible and b foreseeable. So this is really horrid a dilemma, for those once necessarily left to do job at, police in a more general meaning and so to say and so called here. The more in so far, that the most scrupulous subject study needed to fall to deepest black seeing, a decease, and therefore got to be its own fiercest enemy, its own section C patient.

Human dignity or system crash

It is them who cannot other to look out for a savety at work ruling: and its name is coined: human dignity. Arguably positive. Cause originally it must have been negatively used so far as a pious prayer, that is the torturers dignity not to fall beyond a to death crippling of ghost at their victims, yes, but in the same way, once in such a continuum, fast enough to themselves. Human dignity could not claim to be an all situations assuring shield, as it does, but its phenomenon is to deciphered an expectable consolidating objectivity, such a street traffic ruling.  To talk about it as of the mother of ideologies, as Bahamas did 2002, is in so far intriguing, as its, human dignity’s, job well is to be mother of critiques.

Here is to note that the naming is witness, to be hold as for but an aggressive distinguishing of a “bouncer, Aph. Stille Herberge MM, against mixing into another group pressing out of different mood against our basic income receivers.  (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  For these cases where some meant to spare death-economically by touching basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  fonds of others soon, “pathogenesis of social schizophrenia”, Aph. Organum novissimum, MM, more comparable to a distemper plague, applying of a general animal protection should suffice. So the coining of human worth would not stem at all – did not we learn never say none? We did   ok, that is at least just positively – out of a “jealousy” conflict as of Aph. 49 Moral und Zeitordnung.

This altogether hopefully brought some light about the ever upcoming anger or ridicule, when basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  hate speech is on.

It is just teaching, the how forgetting” of the most important, arguably the most important to keep in mind, grasps ground in times of crisis, to say need happen to happen, and that there nothing left to keep organizing against a “hell machine” that is history, I mentioned that, right. Surely enough, you insulted me Weltverbesserer. Aph. 149 Halblang. Yes, and it is true, I am fed up, did I mentioned that, yet? (;

formal apologies

You know, my error is always early, that I think myself cleverer than others, e.g. when in the beginning of it conversation I asked, why did it not prevent that or that ? How late did I come to the idea to ask, what for another one “ihnen endlich mit der linken Hand Steine anbietet für den Hunger, dem die Rechte das Brot vorenthält.”Aph. 96 Januspalast.

You find this pattern in the article (no the whole newspaper), again, (no still), as I declare, pointing to others. .. So you got me commenting on a news once more, do not rely on mine! Be warned.

head ache to read such a circular system

Just to illustrate the head ache to read such a circular system. Imagine you got a system, where you knew them to count – for some willful brutality, let us call it human dignity black spot occultism to be precise, or another – 2+2=lets say to 3. After that, if it comes for some reason to any 1+1 formula, we had to bet on: what? 1+1=2, but soon it flips (“umwerfen”!) to 1+1=0 with the same “(des-)integrative” right. Just the same you got them with a (con)sequence of bets, yes, but worse, as one imagines. So if you demonstrated them the falsity at one statement coin, of what (bad) use? For any (non) unforeseeable eagerness they flipped “uncounted” others and always, as you suppose, “grinning” “superiorly” at you, as if it were their “living”. Aph. 151. “10 Thesen gegen Okkultismus.”

By that it is not even excluded, that randomly they hit with somewhat true and even so far unknown, you “moaningly” needed to rely upon.

Aaand …

 

.. There is no latency distress of an intrinsic exit ot of a self-indepted unmouthfullness such,

missing accusations of “the polish attacked us”-apologies

For example, they never would admit, at least that seems, an unmouthyness, a lack of human dignity money, within a nation state as s e l f-i n d e p t e d. No, you know, who gots the debt for it all: state of Germany. Sure they could, they, Germans, should have done more, enlightenment effort, export unquoted namely, to this respect, yes, but I wonder how this an offensiveness gots not to be what they call structural antisemitism, leftist, unchangeable, as they keep belonging to the orc ship of anti-germans occultism. How that sucks? This is not just noise, ppl. I give you a track: If it is not like that the Polish are exploited by the Germany, or the neighborhood by the EU etc, as a narrative goes, then there should be no reasonable voice left, that it could be well other way around, no? So, then, whats left not to be prepared to hear it from somehow next-less reasonable voices, recently? Quite, set to rightful a position once? You see it too closely, they learn nothing, but got a “living from it” writing on those topics wittily. Aph. 151. I tell you, thats costing nerves. (that should be in deed the resource targeted by such a business)

copyleft basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)  critique

Another example, (just to find a place to drop it) they do not argue about basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income), but that does not mean that it needed no critique. I does. Imho. Another thing: It seems just forethought not to mention the impact of “free software” in todays world. Cause then you could easily fall into drawing conclusions from an analogy. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.de.html. So what could one find against a basic income (in German we need to pray: Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen=unconditional basic income)? Lately, that is not labeled Christian basic income,(to torture them even with that label) one would answer. One could come to the idea, that similar to the term  “freeware” it is a spurious gratis advertisement, seducing to omission of organic growth.  (an overlooked “relevance” Aph. 84 “Klein und Groß” of a: “copyleft“) Thats both the sin of freeware

– we shall have forgotten its you-cannot-propaganda of the earlier days but fast enough, right? and as now we got new even more serious propaganda problems, overwhelmed as soon as everybody had to use it late free software, “open source” … –

and of a fascist basic income.

(So as for previous filtering we need first narrow down talk  to unconditional basic income, not as another incredible figure head for forced labor, heavily in fashion these days in Germany, I can swear of, 08, well I should not do that, a get that: “shocked” to give Aph. 150 extrablatt a try.. Kind of inverse of “Arbeit macht frei” sounds yet in next generation: “Freiheit macht arbeiten”, really no joke! sos. Hopefully we got rescued from an unconditional unconditional basic income next, a shield against a swearing to satanism, would it be?)

Its superficiality consists not only in cutting the living force from its mighty and needed roots by free beer training, it is moreover hiding that the intouchability is getting but touched, that it is actually ill.

cUt logical roots

roots, roots, roots. I might add that I do not speak above all about a logical roots that got cut. So the desintegration trick behind polemizing against a Christian ideology, is that at that time the object of polimics is something already cut from its logical roots. As a main withness I could choose the cruzifix the figure and artwork of the death event, meant as desincentive against the societal monist while way self assured depressing a tramp to death, picturing to precesely these days happenings.

negative deterrence wonder: combating societal murder

So speaking about crucifixes I found anothers aspects of it negative deterrence wonder, a sarkasm as this one.  Michel Foucault in “Überwachen und Strafen” spoke of a delinquency and among it the “persecuted innocence”. Thats right. So give it a try. If Jesus the point of innocence is approached a limiting value by at his right and left hand two convicted murderers, which found but its way of melting together in the moment of death, as told in Lucas, in this moment however a surrounding system, the prolonged rest society is enlightened a field, whose latent or not so latent at all murderiosity was to avarage at least increasing above those two convicted. Thats is terrific in two aspects first the spline and second the spline holding plateau: You should be marked convicted as a murderer to be in any reach a helping hand, to say to be better than the rest, that is first worse by definition and secondly that for not even convicted, yet, right? The convicted murder shall be then just “bad behavior”, in other words abnormality from an absolute “inhumanness of soci e ty”, double n thank you. Said that in order to attach to Adornos between the lines daring and contribution about it finding of a flagrancy: “Die Gesellschaft hat gegen Unmenschlichkeit gar nichts, gegen schlechtes Benehmen dafür umso mehr.”Aph. 116 Und höre nur, wie bös er war.

Well it is all about denouncing monist favorabilities, while sacrificing tramps, and call it a legal weapon, aint it? Did we perhaps invite them ork? We did not!

Part II giving him the rest

And so forth, the negative deterrence, a mirror and an arts, how about this one: It is told, I do not even remember where, that the only persons by his cross resting were two woman, the mother Maria and his friend Maria Magdalena. To give him comfort or what? Such as the crown of thorns, I would rather mean. Typically in the sit for a so seen “ungood”, Aph. 119 Tugendspiegel, the tramp, the asozial, etc. the only human bounds left to him are the ones that are typically not to cut that easy. First awaitedly his mother could not flee its role and secondly the women, awaitedly the first and unique, who holds – arguably – offspring of him. Both, held to be programmed soon into swear mood of blaming (better: making him feel) him and his misdoings for the unfortunate investments, are to be awaited cheap apparatuses of punishment and therefore considered helpful in the ordeal his last steps, thus to be allowed from out of a monist view, the matriarchal counterpart of our patriarchal freedom religion. This is included within the picture, how they monists usually torture well just the best one to death literally. Altogether they monist are too junky for not giving them next copycat tramps decent a deterrence signal. This is the weakness their adversaries the Christians could bet on, negatively turning the crucifying of patriarchy by who else the matriarchy into deterrent the enlightenment of how  monism is an occultist to death torturer to be battled against from the beginning on: Holding the cross against anybody’s face, well sight. I like that. I can not see what speaks against, from a logical point of view, I mean. So that’s rather the diagnosis, the problem of later times combatants speech of above. They are simply yet to stupid to stand against the torture occultism.

I mean, its true, measure somebody today hum, pardon decisive a bum on his the roads to death, considering all the circumstances such as nation, political support of his side, productivity and landscape control increase etc and compare with the ancient days of a Jesus and we need to admit, that the enlightenment level of once we are not any more able to reach and even more that our current enlightenment level, we live from, we are not any more able to sustain by our own force at the moment of the epoch.

PartIII No question she WAS! virgin

btw. you know, these days I hit with the virginity of Maria. Kind Clint Eastwood, the Polish, in his Film Opel Astra, when he nagged the Pastor about the virginity. I know one could learn a lot from this artist’s catholic theologies, even but I do not know if his digging out investigation got yet that far, and if he was really still after it or did point to a solution, I would not have gotten so far. Clint Eastwood in “Ford Mustang” or “Merciless”.

So: if the depressed to death asocial was Jesus, the purest and most innocent of all, seemingly his father should have been from the same wood. And similar fate. But as experience of normality and societal reality deprived from family live and disposed in one form or the other. This to be hold certain out of an approach of negative dialectics, which is the only form allowed within the ban of images, first paragraph is it. Once dared entirely to that scheme, I ask: Just by tendency, a matter of prostitution was it not just? Given that the asocial could give the smalled return of invest, a whole nothing, was it, I bet. An approach of  limit value would be than the purest point inter things prostitution, and despite all what one repeats about a women in such sociciatal sit. So the Christians, enlightened as they were, got easy profit showing up the heathenish concept short coming, madness, fundamentally by a single word or as you wish art work to make them shut up: she should have been rather virgin than what they say. You got me. I love it. Certainly enough: painfully superstitious are you monists and terribly a plague is anything what comes out of yous, however, the Virginity of Maria, mother of Jesus, should be even that certain not that, but pious an urgent shield against idiot attacks. I love that? Did I mention that?

logical a chain found: how is basic income the source of building?

So besides from the heathenish dilemma, antinomy,  that fleeing from prostitution gathering money one gets the deeper into it, “economics of a beauty”. Aph. 109 L’inutile beauté. I had a talk about it woman related aphorisms sequences within the other post of b75, how this integrates. So besides this one might hold against: a live of generalized women’s prostitution might be painful, but not be inutile or even impossible? Look. This might indeed not be easy for me to grasp, even so it is easy. If we have a ghost, to say a building or individuation happening, to say live, there must have been a propagation of it ghost during times and generations, right? Right from Asozial father to son, as seen. So here it comes to “Negation of Negation”, that according to this calculus is not positive. (Aph. 152 Vor Mißbrauch wird gewarnt)

Jesus Cause of Murder

Fr 9. Nov 23:03:33 CET 2018

late note drop to the second last Aphorism of the book: Notable that also Jesus teaches (to depend on) an important cause of the heathenish murder attacking the enlightenment, that is the truth where it is to be channeled a big deal in the various subjunctive moods of Sanscrit derivates. The vanishing of full subjunctive in language structure or expression chance, however, to be measured every here and there, shall be prove how the devastating is happening in the last 5000 year to Jesus and now. Test: Try anybody ask a German: “He would see”, indicative. “Er wurde sehen.” Even though this might be grammatically possible, he would not be able to: grasp that. Is he bewitched or even mad?

Are not these road casualties by once indecent a communication traffic really that unavoidably lost, we should find sensibility for to detract its ground, should not we? (Novella Requests)

 

I got Hegel  brings “matrimony” into game here, he should be right, so I.

Adorno.

Cause even to these two the purest ever, the one between, the mother, should do the devil, do the orc, to suffer the sorrow to heave it above material happening. There is only problem:

This is an occultism difficult to detect: They might say: we did not contribute to a system, where the hurting of a soul of another on could be even so ones own soul, simply because we never will be woman. Leave the woman on their way, we do ours and keep ghost living. Answer to that: This is untrue. As she is human as yous, what happened to her ghost, you got right to fear happening to the ghost of yous yourselves. But finally at a propagation scope of ghost, a negligence against external got to pretty the same average on the long run, family related harm of ghost kinda, as done to any ordinary sidekick buddy.  So the rule: What has be done to anyone, is done mine, keeps intact only woman not excluded.  (double negation is multiple the sweariness here) So in order to shield the building, one needs to shield from venality along the whole propagation line. The most possible each for all, not excluding, but for those on arguably on job/role of absorbing it venality from the rest.

So the wish for a building comes down to a fight against a venality, comes down to fight against (but sexual) prostitution( but in general sense), comes down to such of women in front line situation, arguable battled field, cannot other to come down to want to achieve an environment where prostitution shall be first out of need and second – grown worse – out of sight.

I mean business interest: there should not be man poor enough, for getting gain, swapping him for richeres?

This astounding, cause I could not imagine gravitating an ordinary building-economical plaid for unconditional basic income to such a format. Never.

The material minimal of men,

is focal point of women’s building,

is the front line of planet’s building.

So these were arguably ideal or necessary condition of ghost growth, and the base argumentation pattern that stemmed the unconditional basic income as a urgent source of a building on earth. Right? How down beating intriguing was this an explanation? Hoo. At least I came to the ground of the 152 once in my live.  (;

And, yes, maybe I am just held: “Verstümmelung der Frauen durch die patriarchalische Gesellschaft” There were an “insight into the crippling of woman by patriarchal society.” lanced by whom? I should  block that from here at least: How is that sure that an occultism labeled such (patriarchal) were in service of patriarchy, to say one were not blatantly swapping solution and problem to combat? The same goes to the “cprippling”, distributed why not unequally among sexes? How then further is ensured not to hold an organ for a crippling, water for gasoline to the fire, a flower for a deformation? Infected soon enough by complete madness? About what exactly why who have been warned in the end in the title of it aphorism? Let me guess.

Do not get that wrong: It is not that I would not honor the speculation as such at the hour of bug reporting: Then tell me who definitely got the insight? The derivation of it is said to be subjunctive. That yes. But the happening of insight itself arguable indicative, namely that of Adorno. Its rather  a bug. A denunciation we got, boss, a buggy one. Of a, not less, patriarchy. How much do we rather need that? Yes, he got that from the dream in dream tool, he himself claimed prone to “abuse”, was he? Kinda Nietzsche with whip syndrome yet, aint it? – From Maria-virgin antinomy. Was she? They’d better believed that.

I could stop and will at last chop leaving a bare outstanding a result of an argumentation line. A finding. The question that remains and will be remaining: How would who adopt something why that outstanding. Just to why a word.

We got disparate a picture of its, argumentation, historical advocacy through the times. Mainly abandoned  everybody neither felt concerned nor favored, thinks I, even though it happened – very little flattering – by economic demand of ghost. Something seems at its evolutionary stage an organ of ghost cleaning up occultism of all flavors. Up to now this worked arguably. However, one understands: money economy does not demand any more ghost; on the contrary conscienceless beings to prepare to human the foreseen future once happened to economic horses is rather the demand of the hour. If this were not an arguable vanishing of ghost, then at least a foreshadow for another collapse.

What happens at the hour of an inspection such as mine or if you want that of Adorno or Hegel or be it whatsname Shakes… Eastwood, is the organ’s order to change the functioning mode, as a defense feature of it organ itself. By now you got arguable luck having it worked by itself, from now on it needs your explicit wish, it oracles. Rising the urgency while steadily sinking your capacity. That at least.

 

Today’s supporters of it figure, arguably by a long shot at the side of so said societal monists, are not anymore able to and even so are far from to reproduce its original meaning, but insist on normality handed on, to say a tradition to be defended against a concurrent one. That’s right. Their adversaries, even though once in mission of the tramp’s cause, do not reckognize the logical ground from which to grow, to refine, to learn whitin the battle and fail to gather urgent forces to throw down societal monism once more.

Alltogether: One saw the truth ursurped by by two untrue opponents accusing themselves of untruth. And: they found no way to put it off. Why not this time?

Distracting the industries environment and its productivity increase iller than ever, and without being helped that way. Typically leftist to profit from anybody’s deterioration, they themselves would swear to be even proud upon, yes? And therefore one needed to criticize that it, “free beer” basic income, (that does not mean that everybody could not by w h a t  h e  or  s h e  w a n ts , a beer) might be another perverts’ trap, to say part of the problem and not that of a solution. – Arguable. Aphorism 145 Kunstfigur talks of the dialectics of newcomers’s “shame” and  a the “taboo” of but inactive guardians, “Großmoguls”. So it depended on the synthesis , right word? Swearily enough, true, once set to air, – of those capable of a critiques.

negative basic income critique paths

And just for sake of formalism and because I tired -I mentioned that -: Was not it Adorno contented with some”what” calories equipped and floating “sur le eau” (An Aphorism 100)
“like a stupid woman”, one might object positively? Hm, should have been Horkheimer, who tortured him to rely on an maximal distance within whats left to a nazi-germany joke to speak out: “

Es soll keiner Hungern und Frieren, Wers Doch tut, Kommt ins KZ.

“, by proposing to find it nifty verse in “neon-letters” illuminated on “top of a culture industries” ork ships’ building. (Dialektik der Aufklärung, Culture Industries)

So how about?

“Einladung zur Konferenz am 5. Mai 2018 in Leipzig. Die Redaktion Bahamas.” B78: Try out my design! I would be glad and donate it for free.

You know, first it is, seems, – for some reasons – quite out of fashion to address terms culture industries aka fascism at least these days. For being arguable: Americans who else, you know. B74 “Dummheit und Stolz”. And yes, notably they hid it source “Dialektik der Aufklärung” out of the free beer internet, lately, when in need for reach. So its even harder to “remember”any respect falling as drop into the monster’s throat” (Dialektik der Aufklärung) every once a while, you know. You can find me paranoid but tired. However, to talk about a maximality with which to love god, – that is as much as you can and to find rest once I,- I find this approach of these two a robust enough, cause arguable and at the same time, nonetheless, therefore hardened by negative dialectic and thus clean, i m h o. (And all that not to connect talk to – AGAINST! there is really  sheer need to address that -once possible decentralized models.) I love it.

Denk doch an den Mord  – der heidnischen Unterversorgung. Denn sonst wirst du die Kosten für deine eigene geistige Gesundheit für zu niedrig ansetzen.

In English:

consider the murder, if you got your sanity dear!

and thus: Du denkst an Mord, wenn du liebst.

How to make concrete live? Matth. 5.21-26

late add, date
Mo 23. Jul 17:51:48 CEST 2018

3 Things. Two in the row, one odd. Now if the difference between heathendom and and lets say god believe or Enlightenment, would be murder, how to deal with it then? The first answer, is pessimistic Aph. ”La nuance encore”: He is the “poet” of todays fascist world ”weened to make the concrete speaking”.

Second Jesus says it very well, it is the work of your live of you all, to overcome it problem all together or not all together. This is notable furthermore in full compliance with the individuation principle from Leibnitz, that goes: All for one, one for all. You got the house number above, nothing but just straight forward kernel. Lovely, imho.

Third, they lately got Christians at Bahamas. Do not believe me? Then take a nose of this dope. You can recheck Matth. 5.16-20 and yes that true they teach to live from the ancient roots. I wont comment it all too much. But drop that note here, occasionally, cause it adheres. I sure everybody loved it.

 

bets I, but loads of any thinkable w orks-arounds  of but such colors shipped with infinite bets about pro- or regression, are not I right?

There should be a slightest track, chance of a “excuse”-thing in reach, are not we all together gone far far beyond, understands I.

Example offff.

Hopefully not. But expectedly enough this very thought here , I mean, of mine to the appealed. So an ultimate reasoning rule goes: if your tired

Tired

go to “bed” MM 50 Lücken, aint you? Yes. But the lullaby. Lullaby, lullaby, aint there any lullaby of the lullaby of the lullaby for such cases?

“How about it: War is money” Dead Kennedys – Kinky Sex Makes the World Go ‘Round – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVGg_5grOTg YouTube, bah no sound, we got lucky. They called them ork ships US companies. Is not it antisemetic, well not that strong as else where- its a snow white – hopefully…

musescore -velocity 50%  Beethofen_Symphonie3_Opus55_Mvt2_Heroique.mid, dah, Yes.  Dissis best.

-https://youtu.be/wdHY_lyh5KY?t=169- ok, if you mean, not just that, again.

hacking euthanasia business

“the worst are the dole days” … to be mentioned for the inner consistency of the occultism proposed in the propagandist pseudo-plaid article B78 “Die Alten machen uns fertig.” Lets have a economical model of a persons group in lets say need of a bread. Then imagine somebody, socialic enough, calling the market price for it ware, bread, “not other than insultingly” low, and – no question allowed – welcoming an orc ship support of high standards of prices of a bread, while keeping sure not to loose a word about a dole, that is a any basic income for these bread buyers, between. I guess this basic income thing somehow unpopular,

– mentally blocked quite efficiently, to say not existent within their universe, aah a taboo is the indication:

an outgrown dole taboo beast upstream, boss!-

, within these circles of Adorno “bottle post” (Aph. 133 Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte) reception, aint I right? Now, well I, learned selig sind die da reinen Herzens, denn sie werden Gott schauen. Son, I believe you, that you lost orientation within the alrededor of an “euthanasia” aka systemic murder speech of and would propose not to hold it low supply ware price “unquestionable insulting”, but rather am: opportune.  Even more, to think it non-idiotic, non-ILLEGAL, to target even negative price notation for a bread.

another patches for marxists

please, I pray you, do not get me wrong, it is not that I blackmailed (structural-antisemeticly or what you surely might thought about mine) with a granny gang, these people are really pacific, violence is not our way. I could even SWEAR to you: THEY would NOT attack yous. Are not they the weakest, thus inoffensive targets? Please. Open your heart to mine or if not consult a medical.

Aahh, now I am the liar? Lies, lies, lies, I wonder what would be even the inverse of it lies? maybe a: Kain where is Abel?” 1. Mose – Kapitel 4, 9

Just stimulate your fantasy: an .. air. … To prevent even a para symptoms such WHO “Herzschlag” Dialektik der Aufklärung. I remember from the days of my youth

you know I like to remember these days in sweary times of destabilization like this one now.

the work from Mark Twain, (heavily argued in favor and against because of an R, I know), where a Tom Sawyers strikes the fence and earns even money out of them employees, is not it fantastic?  I sure you will not get me that easy or even hostilely sweary, but as already mentioned I would not give up that easily the hope for yous socialics WHO. We shall start thanking God shepherd watching for every single sheep whole night long. Amen.

Lullabying ..

But?lyrics? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIjqKhO7DmQ free out of the ancient w ork tales: Der Maurer und der König? We once loved and even the pictures are subtle,

look the below: it tells the story of the brickie and a his king erwin. The latter is for paperhanging, too, and a the devil, at least he gots his telephone number yet, and for to reach him after call it a day and then for left loose wall papers or the like, knows I … Now, the location of the of action is however the contemporary ork ing place, -you know few, few decades ago everybody was usually drunk then there, first true and second not anymore -, as one supposes, and there is where to do the whole pacts. – I got: they thirsty. So. However. I understands my lullaby yet at a higher stage of the plot and tells of another place when orcus, seemingly, already was overcome, at least for a while and calming this is for whatever ingenious, wondrous a reason: To talk with “Kant”, this is mom, “Das interesselose Wohlgefallen, das Kant zufolge Kunstwerke erregen, kann nur kraß (kraft) einer historischen Antithetik verstanden werden, die in jedem ästhetischen Objekte nachzittert.” MM Aph. Zauberflöte. That is at least the sense, I gives it to it, while lullabying it in any happy forelorn moments and creeping on earth face. Then, when the piece of art starts lullabying suddenly out of itself, as no-one ever might have a: dreamed? You got me.

Ich sitz hier vor meinem Trinkerha-a im

Und zieh mir den billigen Whiskey ra a in

Zieh mir den Billigen Fusel runter

Nur das macht mich glücklich

Nur das macht mich munter.

Ich bin Al-ko-holiker

und du bist bloß ein Sozialiker

Ich bin Alkoholiker

und du bist bloß n SozozozozozozoIch sitz hier vor meinem Trinkerha a im

Und zieh mir den billigen Whiskey raain

Zieh mir den Billigen Fusel runter

Nur das macht glücklich nur das macht mich munter

Ich bin Alkoholiker und du bloß-

ein Informatike er ich bin Alkoholicker und du bist bloß ein

InfohahahahaIch sitz hier usw.

ich bin Alkoholiker, denn du bist bloß Pseudomeniker (WHO 5-13-71)

Du bist bloß Monisterike-e-r (WHO 28101827),

Monaderika-er (WHO PMM-Syndrom) , denn ich sitz hier vor einem Trinkerha-a-im .. et cetera

 

Table of Contents

1Human dignity once in rubbish basket 1

1.1snoop the danger of falling into Weiberwirtschaft 1

1.1.1Apologize Marx 1

1.1.1.1with Hölderlin 2

1.1.2identify culprits of positive marxism 2

2Greeks loved their Slaves, too. 3

2.1For to miss accusation of a Nazi Apology 3

2.1.1and to win every next general human-friendliness contest 4

2.1.2for to miss accusations of an Islam Apology 4

2.2news locked up into the vicious circle 6

2.2.1.1.1picking the trinity 6

formally correct trigonometries 7

37: annoyingly missing quotes on Shakespeares 7

patches for marxists first 7

47: an Antisemitism origin, btw 8

4.1.1.1.1How excellent 9

stop it gag-lunacy 9

4.1.1.1.2.. and The Name of the Social ork 10

4.1.2marxist betting among heathens 10

4.1.2.1missing a dialectic of enlightenment 10

4.1.2.1.1What gots it in its pocket? 11

red rags 11

4.1.2.1.2Blessed are the asozials. 11

4.1.2.1.3Human dignity or system crash 12

4.1.3formal apologies 13

4.1.3.1head ache to read such a circular system 13

4.1.4missing accusations of “the polish attacked us”-apologies 13

4.1.5copyleft basic income critique 14

4.1.6negative basic income critique paths 14

5Es soll keiner Hungern und Frieren, Wers Doch tut, Kommt ins KZ. 15

6Tired 16

6.1hacking euthanasia business 16

7an outgrown dole taboo beast upstream, boss!- 16

7.1.1another patches for marxists 16

7.2Lullabying .. 17

A novella of Hupert-Kind and proposal of a primitive a novella generator

#export localpath=/home/.../SophoklesKrösos/
updatedfile="Novelle_enhanced2.txt"
Novelle=Novelle3
cd $localpath
wget -c -O- http://www.zeno.org/Literatur/M/Goethe,+Johann+Wolfgang/Erz%C3%A4hlungen/Novelle>$Novelle
--2017-08-08 20:53:09-- http://www.zeno.org/Literatur/M/Goethe,+Johann+Wolfgang/Erz%C3%A4hlungen/Novelle
Resolving www.zeno.org (www.zeno.org)... 85.214.88.86
Connecting to www.zeno.org (www.zeno.org)|85.214.88.86|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 72865 (71K) [text/html]
Saving to: ‘STDOUT’

- 100%[===================>] 71,16K --.-KB/s in 0,07s

2017-08-08 20:53:10 (960 KB/s) - written to stdout [72865/72865]



cat $Novelle |html2text >foo
anfang=$(sed -n "/ Johann Wolfgang Goethe /=" foo)
ende=$(sed -n '/Goethes Werke/=' foo)
sed -n "$anfang,$ende p" foo| sed -e "s/\[[1-9]*\]//g"|tee $Novelle.txt|wc
 678 7138 47302
# you can now edid the snipped and name it $updatedfile
# 678 7138 47302
diff "$Novelle".txt $updatedfile > $Novelle.patch
patch $Novelle.txt -i $Novelle.patch -o $Novelle.patched.txt
patching file Novelle3.patched.txt (read from Novelle3.txt)



#FAQ/TODO/README
#cd
#Usage: relabel one character and lieve the document on disk in Text format, ready a birthday present it is yours and named my.txt:
sed -e "s/Kind/Kind-Hupert/g" $Novelle.patched.txt|tee my$Novelle.txt |grep KindFür unsere Protagonisten ist die Welt nicht ganz ungefährlich, sie entscheiden sich aber doch als in einer Art Familienausflug, Picknick, zu einem öffentlichen Fußballspiel zu fahren. Die Frau macht den Vorschlag zum Cafe auf dem Markt vorher noch vorbeizufahren. Auf dem Weg entscheidet man sich noch viele Aussichtsstellen in eine Stadt, Welt, anzusteuern, die mit Göthe wie von einer Bergspitze immer nach unten sich ausbreitet, bis man mit dem Fernrohr die letzten Dörfer noch sieht. Zwischendurch bemerkt man den notorischen Marktbrand und sieht auch gleich das ausgebrochene, zu töten nach der Höhe der Kunst wohl programmierte Tier Tiger auf einen losstürmen. Aber versöhnlich mit der Tierpflegerfamilie, Mann, Frau und Kind-Hupert hilft man denn auch das andere ausgebrochene Tier wenigstens, den Löwen, dem Tierschutz zuzuführen. 
Kind-Hupertes! Wie lange begleiteten wir dich auf deinen Fahrten, wie lange war deine
Frau und Kind-Hupert. Und nun gab die Familie zusammen Schmerz und Überraschung zu
»Hier diese Frau und dieses Kind-Hupert«, erwiderte der Vater hastig, »erbieten sich,
Nach einigem Nachdenken, wobei sich der Fürst nach dem Kind-Huperte umsah, das immer
Das Kind-Hupert verfolgte seine Melodie, die keine war, eine Tonfolge ohne Gesetz, und
das Kind-Hupert hie und da mit anmutigen Tönen; als aber der Vater geendigt hatte,
an, worauf der Vater die Flöte ergriff, im Einklang sich hören ließ, das Kind-Hupert
Eindringlich aber ganz besonders war, daß das Kind-Hupert die Zeilen der Strophe
Wäre da dem Kind-Huperte bang?
Euren Gesang, durch den Gesang dieses Kind-Hupertes, mit Hülfe dieser Flötentöne
»Wenn Euer Kind-Hupert«, sagte nunmehr der Wärtel, »flötend und singend, wie Ihr
Kind-Hupert hinein, so kann ich die Öffnung mit leichter Mühe schließen, und der
werde mich so stellen, daß meine Kugel jeden Augenblick dem Kind-Huperte zu Hülfe
hinauf, gerade dem Eingang gegenüber, den ich erwähnt habe; das Kind-Hupert mag
herab, wie das Kind-Hupert die Wendeltreppen hinunter in dem klaren Hofraum sich
Endlich hörte man die Flöte wieder; das Kind-Hupert trat aus der Höhle hervor mit
Indessen hatte sich der Löwe ganz knapp an das Kind-Hupert hingelegt und ihm die
Glorreich sang das Kind-Hupert weiter, nachdem es mit wenigen Tönen vorgespielt hatte:
hier, und wirklich sah das Kind-Hupert in seiner Verklärung aus wie ein mächtiger,
friedlichen Willen Anheimgegebene. Das Kind-Hupert flötete und sang so weiter, nach
»Und so geht mit guten Kind-Hupertern
cat my$Novelle.txt

A novel of Hupert-Kind

**** Johann Wolfgang Goethe ****
**** Novelle ****
Prolog:
Die Fürstenfamilie ist nicht formell adelig, aber im eigentlichen Sinn. Sie sind Sozialhilfeempfänger im Jahr 2017 in der dritten Generation die sich das Leben ganz so einrichten, als wäre es das von Fürsten und wenig soll ihnen fehlen dazu. Sie residieren nicht in einem Schloss mit Hofstaat, obwohl sie ihr Zuhause ja wohl so bezeichnen können und man auch von der Wohnung aus weit auf Stadt und Land sehen kann.
In der Familie ein Bruder Oheim Friedering und eine Schwägerin, die sogenannte Fürstin. Sie sind mit den demokratischen, also den Herrschaftspflichten, kontinuierlich seit jeher gegen Widerstände mit der Versöhnung ihrer Welt und der sogenannten antagonistischen Welt befasst.
Die Antagonisten können auch 6ns-Leute – eine Software-Simulation gefüttert mit ihren Einstellung würde „ausgestorben nach schlimm prominenten 6 Nano Sekunden“ liefern – genannt werden oder wie hier nichtadlig. Und es ist nur das, dass ihr Streit darüber sich entzündet, ob ein Ding zwei Personen oder allen gehört.
In der Novelle treffen die beiden Gruppen mal in intakter Familienstruktur gegeneinander und suchen schließlich Integration bei der Gelegenheit von Tierschutzgeschäften. Mal treten sie als ausgebrochenes Raubtier gegen Mensch unmittelbar und blutig gegeneinander auf.
Sicherlich sind die Adligen so sehr in ihren politischen Geschäften der Initiierung und Inszenierung der Versöhnung verwurzelt, als dass nicht 5 Freude der asozialen Familie dazu gesellt stehen, die einen oder zwei, zu weilen gegenüber gefährdenden wilden Tieren schusssicheren Hofjunker, auch Wärtel, genannt. Zudem der Finanzminister, Ratgeber und Beauftragter in finanzpolitischen Fragen. Eine Art Integrationsminister oder Versöhnungsminister mit eigentlich nichtadligen, genannt Zeichner. Und ein Sicherheitsminister gegenüber eigentlich nichtadeligen. Genannt Wächter. Vorzustellen sind: fünf angestammte Freunde einer so sich definierenden adligen Familie im Jahr 2017.
Für unsere Protagonisten ist die Welt nicht ganz ungefährlich, sie entscheiden sich aber doch als in einer Art Familienausflug, Picknick, zu einem öffentlichen Fußballspiel zu fahren. Die Frau macht den Vorschlag zum Cafe auf dem Markt vorher noch vorbeizufahren. Auf dem Weg entscheidet man sich noch viele Aussichtsstellen in eine Stadt, Welt, anzusteuern, die mit Göthe wie von einer Bergspitze immer nach unten sich ausbreitet, bis man mit dem Fernrohr die letzten Dörfer noch sieht. Zwischendurch bemerkt man den notorischen Marktbrand und sieht auch gleich das ausgebrochene, zu töten nach der Höhe der Kunst wohl programmierte Tier Tiger auf einen losstürmen. Aber versöhnlich mit der Tierpflegerfamilie, Mann, Frau und Kind-Hupert hilft man denn auch das andere ausgebrochene Tier wenigstens, den Löwen, dem Tierschutz zuzuführen.

 

 

Ein dichter Herbstnebel verhüllte noch in der Frühe die weiten Räume des
fürstlichen Schloßhofes, als man schon mehr oder weniger durch den sich
lichtenden Schleier die Regentropfen. Ganz als ob mit Göthe die Beschreibung über die Regentropfen zuträfe, über das, womit Regentropfen sich so rumschlagen tagsüber: die ganze Jägerei zu Pferde und zu Fuß durcheinander bewegt sah. Die eiligen Beschäftigungen der Nächsten ließen sich erkennen: man verlängerte, man verkürzte die Steigbügel, man reichte sich Büchse und Patrontäschchen, man schob die Dachsranzen zurecht, indes die Hunde ungeduldig am Riemen den Zurückhaltenden mit fortzuschleppen drohten. Auch hie und da
gebärdete ein Pferd sich mutiger, von feuriger Natur getrieben oder von dem
Sporn des Reiters angeregt, der selbst hier in der Halbhelle eine gewisse
Eitelkeit, sich zu zeigen, nicht verleugnen konnte. Alle die Regentropfen jedoch warteten auf
den Fürsten, der, von seiner jungen Gemahlin, der Fürstin, Abschied nehmend, allzulange
zauderte.
Erst vor kurzer Zeit zusammen getraut, empfanden sie schon das Glück
übereinstimmender Gemüter; beide waren von tätig lebhaftem Charakter, eines
nahm gern an des andern Neigungen und Bestrebungen Anteil. Des Fürsten Vater
hatte noch den Zeitpunkt erlebt und genutzt, wo es deutlich wurde, daß alle
Staatsglieder in gleicher Betriebsamkeit ihre Tage zubringen, in gleichem
Wirken und Schaffen jeder nach seiner Art erst gewinnen und dann genießen
sollten.
Wie sehr dieses gelungen war, ließ sich in diesen Tagen gewahr werden, als eben
der Hauptmarkt sich versammelte, den man gar wohl eine Messe nennen konnte. Der
Fürst hatte seine Gemahlin gestern durch das Gewimmel der aufgehäuften Waren zu
Drahtesel geführt und sie bemerken lassen, wie gerade hier das Gebirgsland mit dem
flachen Lande einen glücklichen Umtausch treffe; er wußte sie an Ort und Stelle
auf die Betriebsamkeit seines Länderkreises aufmerksam zu machen.
Wenn sich nun der Fürst fast ausschließlich in diesen Tagen mit den Seinigen
über diese zudringenden Gegenstände unterhielt, auch besonders mit dem
Finanzminister anhaltend arbeitete, so behielt doch auch der Landjägermeister
sein Recht, auf dessen Vorstellung es unmöglich war, der Versuchung zu
widerstehen, an diesen günstigen Herbsttagen eine schon verschobene Jagd, d.h. den Besuch eines Fußballspiels zu
unternehmen, sich selbst und den vielen angekommenen Fremden ein eignes und
seltnes Fest zu eröffnen.
Die Fürstin blieb ungern zurück; man hatte sich vorgenommen, weit in das Gebirg
hineinzudringen, um die friedlichen Bewohner der dortigen Wälder durch einen
unerwarteten Kriegszug zu beunruhigen.
Scheidend versäumte der Gemahl Fürst nicht, einen Spazierfahrt vorzuschlagen, den sie
im Geleit Friedrichs, des fürstlichen Oheims, unternehmen sollte. »Auch lasse
ich«, sagte er, »dir unsern Honorio als Stall- und Hofjunker, der für alles
sorgen wird.« Und im Gefolg dieser Worte nahm er den Regenschirm verschwand sodann im Regen.
Die Fürstin, die ihrem Gemahl noch in den Schloßhof hinab mit dem Schnupftuch
nachgewinkt hatte, begab sich in die hintern Zimmer, welche nach dem Gebirg
eine freie Aussicht ließen, die um desto schöner war, als das Schloß selbst von
dem Flusse herauf in einiger Höhe stand und so vor- als hinterwärts
mannigfaltige bedeutende Ansichten gewährte. Sie fand das treffliche Teleskop
noch in der Stellung, wo man es gestern abend gelassen hatte, als man, über
Busch, Berg und Waldgipfel die hohen Ruinen der uralten Stammburg betrachtend,
sich unterhielt, die in der Abendbeleuchtung merkwürdig hervortraten, indem
alsdann die größten Licht- und Schattenmassen den deutlichsten Begriff von
einem so ansehnlichen Denkmal alter Zeit verleihen konnten. Auch zeigte sich
heute früh durch die annähernden Gläser recht auffallend die herbstliche
Färbung jener mannigfaltigen Baumarten, die zwischen dem Gemäuer ungehindert
und ungestört durch lange Jahre emporstrebten. Die schöne Dame richtete jedoch
das Fernrohr etwas tiefer nach einer öden, steinigen Fläche, über welche der
Jagdzug weggehen mußte. Sie erharrte den Augenblick mit Geduld und betrog sich
nicht, denn bei der Klarheit und Vergrößerungsfähigkeit des Instruments
erkannten ihre glänzenden Augen deutlich den Fürsten und den
Oberstallmeister; ja sie enthielt sich nicht, abermals mit dem Schnupftuche zu
winken, als sie ein augenblickliches Stillhalten und Rückblicken mehr vermutete
als gewahr ward.
Fürst Oheim, Friedrich mit Namen, trat sodann, angemeldet, mit seinem Zeichner
herein, der ein großes Portefeuille unter dem Arm trug. »Liebe Cousine,« sagte
der alte, rüstige Herr, »hier legen wir die Ansichten der Stammburg vor,
gezeichnet, um von verschiedenen Seiten anschaulich zu machen, wie der mächtige
Trutz- und Schutzbau von alten Zeiten her dem Jahr und seiner Witterung sich
entgegenstemmte und wie doch hie und da sein Gemäuer weichen, da und dort in
wüste Ruinen zusammenstürzen mußte. Nun haben wir manches getan, um diese
Wildnis zugänglicher zu machen, denn mehr bedarf es nicht, um jeden Wanderer,
jeden Besuchenden in Erstaunen zu setzen, zu entzücken.«
Indem nun der Fürst die einzelnen Blätter deutete, sprach er weiter: »Hier, wo
man, den Hohlweg durch die äußern Ringmauern heraufkommend, vor die eigentliche
Burg gelangt, steigt uns ein Felsen entgegen von den festesten des ganzen
Gebirgs; hierauf nun steht gemauert ein Turm, doch niemand wüßte zu sagen, wo
die Natur aufhört, Kunst und Handwerk aber anfangen. Ferner sieht man seitwärts
Mauern angeschlossen und Zwinger terrassenmäßig herab sich erstreckend. Doch
ich sage nicht recht, denn es ist eigentlich ein Wald, der diesen uralten
Gipfel umgibt. Seit hundertundfunfzig Jahren hat keine Axt hier geklungen, und
überall sind die mächtigsten Stämme emporgewachsen. Wo ihr euch an den Mauern
andrängt, stellt sich der glatte Ahorn, die rauhe Eiche, die schlanke Fichte
mit Schaft und Wurzeln entgegen; um diese müssen wir uns herumschlängeln und
unsere Fußpfade verständig führen. Seht nur, wie trefflich unser Meister dies
Charakteristische auf dem Papier ausgedrückt hat, wie kenntlich die
verschiedenen Stamm- und Wurzelarten zwischen das Mauerwerk verflochten und die
mächtigen Äste durch die Lücken durchgeschlungen sind! Es ist eine Wildnis wie
keine, ein zufällig einziges Lokal, wo die alten Spuren längst verschwundener
Menschenkraft mir der ewig lebenden und fortwirkender Natur sich in dem
ernstesten Streit erblicken lassen.«
Ein anderes Blatt aber vorlegend, fuhr er fort: »Was sagt Ihr nun zum
Schloßhofe, der, durch das Zusammenstürzen des alten Torturmes unzugänglich,
seit undenklichen Jahren von niemand betreten ward? Wir suchten ihm von der
Seite beizukommen, haben Mauern durchbrochen, Gewölbe gesprengt und so einen
bequemen, aber geheimen Weg bereitet. Inwendig bedurft es keines Aufräumens,
hier findet sich ein flacher Felsgipfel von der Natur geplättet, aber doch
haben mächtige Bäume hie und da zu wurzeln Glück und Gelegenheit gefunden; sie
sind sachte, aber entschieden aufgewachsen, nun erstrecken sie ihre Äste bis in
die Galerien hinein, auf denen der Ritter sonst auf und ab schritt, ja durch
Türen durch und Fenster in die gewölbten Säle, aus denen wir sie nicht
vertreiben wollen; sie sind eben Herr geworden und mögens bleiben. Tiefe
Blätterschichten wegräumend, haben wir den merkwürdigsten Platz geebnet
gefunden, dessengleichen in der Welt vielleicht nicht wieder zu sehen ist.
Nach allem diesem aber ist es immer noch bemerkenswert und an Ort und Stelle zu
beschauen, daß auf den Stufen, die in den Hauptturm hinaufführen, ein Ahorn
Wurzel geschlagen und sich zu einem so tüchtigen Baume gebildet hat, daß man
nur mit Not daran vorbeidringen kann, um die Zinne, der unbegrenzten Aussicht
wegen, zu besteigen. Aber auch hier verweilt man bequem im Schatten, denn
dieser Baum ist es, der sich über das Ganze wunderbar hoch in die Luft hebt.
Danken wir also dem wackern Künstler, der uns so löblich in verschiedenen
Bildern von allem überzeugt, als wenn wir gegenwärtig wären; er hat die
schönsten Stunden des Tages und der Jahrszeit dazu angewendet und sich
wochenlang um diese Gegenstände herumbewegt. In dieser Ecke ist für ihn und den
Wächter, den wir ihm zugegeben, eine kleine, angenehme Wohnung eingerichtet.
Sie sollten nicht glauben, meine Beste, welch eine schöne Aus- und Ansicht er
ins Land, in Hof und Gemäuer sich dort bereitet hat! Nun aber, da alles so rein
und charakteristisch umrissen ist, wird er es hier unten mit
Bequemlichkeit ausführen. Wir wollen mit diesen Bildern unsern Gartensaal
zieren, und niemand soll über unsere regelmäßige Parterre, Lauben und
schattigen Gänge seine Augen spielen lassen, der nicht wünschte, dort oben in
dem wirklichen Anschauen des Alten und Neuen, des Starren, Unnachgiebigen,
Unzerstörlichen und des Frischen, Schmiegsamen, Unwiderstehlichen seine
Betrachtungen anzustellen.«
Honorio trat ein und meldete, die Drahtesel seien vorgeführt; da sagte die
Fürstin, zum Oheim gewendet: »Radeln wir hinauf, und lassen Sie mich in der
Wirklichkeit sehen, was Sie mir hier im Bilde zeigten! Seit ich hier bin, hör
ich von diesem Unternehmen und werde jetzt erst recht verlangend, mit Augen zu
sehen, was mir in der Erzählung unmöglich schien und in der Nachbildung
unwahrscheinlich bleibt.« – »Noch nicht, meine Liebe,« versetzte der Fürst;
»was Sie hier sahen, ist, was es werden kann und wird; jetzt stockt noch
manches, die Kunst muß erst vollenden, wenn sie sich vor der Natur nicht
schämen soll.« – »Und so radeln wir wenigstens hinaufwärts, und wär es nur bis
an den Fuß; ich habe große Lust, mich heute weit in der Welt umzusehen.« –
»Ganz nach Ihrem Willen.« versetzte der Fürst. – »Lassen Sie uns aber durch die
Stadt radeln,« fuhr die Dame fort, »über den großen Marktplatz, wo eine
zahllose Menge von Buden die Gestalt einer kleinen Stadt, eines Feldlagers
angenommen hat. Es ist, als wären die Bedürfnisse und Beschäftigungen
sämtlicher Familien des Landes umher nach außen gekehrt, in diesem Mittelpunkt
versammelt, an das Tageslicht gebracht worden, denn hier sieht der aufmerksame
Beobachter alles, was der Mensch leistet und bedarf; man bildet sich einen
Augenblick ein, es sei kein Geld nötig, jedes Geschäft könne hier durch Tausch
abgetan werden, und so ist es auch im Grunde. Seitdem der Fürst gestern mir
Anlaß zu diesen Übersichten gegeben, ist es mir gar angenehm zu denken, wie
hier, wo Gebirg und flaches Land aneinandergrenzen, beide so deutlich
aussprechen, was sie brauchen und was sie wünschen. Wie nun der Hochländer das
Holz seiner Wälder in hundert Formen umzubilden weiß, das Eisen zu einem jeden
Gebrauch zu vermannigfaltigen, so kommen jene drüben mit den
vielfältigsten Waren ihm entgegen, an denen man den Stoff kaum unterscheiden
und den Zweck oft nicht erkennen mag.«

»Ich weiß,« versetzte der Fürst, »daß mein Neffe hierauf die größte
Aufmerksamkeit wendet, denn gerade zu dieser Jahreszeit kommt es hauptsächlich
darauf an, daß man mehr empfange als gebe; dies zu bewirken, ist am Ende die
Summe des ganzen Staatshaushaltes so wie der kleinsten häuslichen Wirtschaft.
Verzeihen Sie aber, meine Beste, ich radle niemals gern durch den Markt; bei jedem Schritt ist man gehindert und aufgehalten, und dann flammt mir
das ungeheure Unglück wieder in die Einbildungskraft, das sich mir gleichsam in
die Augen eingebrannt, als ich eine solche Güter- und Warenbreite in Feuer
aufgehen sah. Ich hatte mich kaum –«
»Lassen Sie uns die schönen Stunden nicht versäumen!« fiel ihm die Fürstin ein,
da der würdige Mann sie schon einigemal mit ausführlicher Beschreibung jenes
Unheil geängstigt hatte, wie er sich nämlich, auf einer großen Reise begriffen,
abends im besten Wirtshause auf dem Markte, der eben von einer Hauptmesse
wimmelte, höchst ermüdet zu Bette gelegt und nachts durch Geschrei und Flammen,
die sich gegen seine Wohnung wälzten, gräßlich aufgeweckt worden.
Die Fürstin eilte, den Lieblingsdrahtesel zu besteigen, und führte, statt zum
Hintertore bergauf, zum Vordertore bergunter ihren widerwillig bereiten
Begleiter; denn wer wäre nicht gern an ihrer Seite geritten, wer wäre ihr nicht
gern gefolgt! Und so war auch Honorio von der sonst so ersehnten Jagd willig
zurückgeblieben, um ihr ausschließlich dienstbar zu sein.
Wie vorauszusehen, durften sie auf dem Markte nur Schritt vor Schritt radeln;
aber die schöne Liebenswürdige erheiterte jeden Aufenthalt durch eine
geistreiche Bemerkung. »Ich wiederhole«, sagte sie, »meine gestrige Lektion, da
denn doch die Notwendigkeit unsere Geduld prüfen will.« Und wirklich drängte
sich die ganze Regentropfenmasse dergestalt an die Radelnden heran, daß sie ihren
Weg nur langsam fortsetzen konnten. Die ganze Regentropfenmasse schaute, als ob sie mit Göthe das Volk wäre, mit Freuden die junge Dame, und auf so viel lächelnden Gesichtern zeigte sich das entschiedene
Behagen, zu sehen, daß die erste Frau im Lande auch die schönste und anmutigste
sei.
Untereinander gemischt standen Bergbewohner unter den Regentropfen, die zwischen Felsen, Fichten und
Föhren ihre stillen Wohnsitze hegten, Flachländer von Hügeln, Auen und Wiesen
her, Regentropfen-Gewerbsleute der kleinen Städte, und was sich alles versammelt hatte. Nach
einem ruhigen Überblick bemerkte die Fürstin ihrem Begleiter, wie alle diese,
woher sie auch seien, mehr Stoff als nötig zu ihren Kleidern genommen, mehr
Tuch und Leinwand, mehr Band zum Besatz. »Ist es doch, als ob die Weiber nicht
brauschig und die Männer nicht pausig genug sich gefallen könnten!«
»Wir wollen ihnen das ja lassen,« versetzte der Oheim; »wo auch der Mensch
seinen Überfluß hinwendet, ihm ist wohl dabei, am wohlsten, wenn er sich damit
schmückt und aufputzt.« Die schöne Dame winkte Beifall.
So waren sie nach und nach auf einen freien Platz gelangt, der zur Vorstadt
hinführte, wo am Ende vieler kleiner Buden und Kramstände ein größeres
Brettergebäude in die Augen fiel, das sie kaum erblickten, als ein
ohrzerreißendes Gebrülle ihnen entgegentönte. Die Fütterungsstunde der dort zur
Schau stehenden wilden Tiere schien herangekommen; der Löwe ließ seine Wald-
und Wüstenstimme aufs kräftigste hören, die Drahtesel schauderten, und man konnte
der Bemerkung nicht entgehen, wie in dem friedlichen Wesen und Wirken der
gebildeten Welt der König der Einöde sich so furchtbar verkündige. Zur Bude
näher gelangt, durften sie die bunten, kolossalen Gemälde nicht übersehen, die
mit heftigen Farben und kräftigen Bildern jene fremden Tiere darstellten,
welche der friedliche Staatsbürger zu schauen unüberwindliche Lust empfinden
sollte. Der grimmig ungeheure Tiger sprang auf einen Mohren los, im Begriff ihn
zu zerreißen, ein Löwe stand ernsthaft majestätisch, als wenn er keine Beute
seiner würdig vor sich sähe; andere wunderliche, bunte Geschöpfe verdienten
neben diesen mächtigen weniger Aufmerksamkeit.
»Wir wollen«, sagte die Fürstin, »bei unserer Rückkehr doch absteigen und die
seltenen Gäste näher betrachten!« – »Es ist wunderbar,« versetzte der
Fürst, »daß der Mensch durch Schreckliches immer aufgeregt sein will. Drinnen
liegt der Tiger ganz ruhig in seinem Kerker, und hier muß er grimmig auf einen
Mohren losfahren, damit man glaube, dergleichen inwendig ebenfalls zu sehen; es
ist an Mord und Totschlag noch nicht genug, an Brand und Untergang: die
Bänkelsänger müssen es an jeder Ecke wiederholen. Die guten Menschen wollen
eingeschüchtert sein, um hinterdrein erst recht zu fühlen, wie schön und
löblich es sei, frei Atem zu holen.«
Was denn aber auch Bängliches von solchen Schreckensbildern mochte
übriggeblieben sein, alles und jedes war sogleich ausgelöscht, als man, zum
Tore hinausgelangt, in die heiterste Gegend eintrat. Der Weg führte zuerst am
Flusse hinan, an einem zwar noch schmalen, nur leichte Kähne tragenden Wasser,
das aber nach und nach als größter Strom seinen Namen behalten und ferne Länder
beleben sollte. Dann ging es weiter durch wohlversorgte Frucht- und Lustgärten
sachte hinaufwärts, und man sah sich nach und nach in der aufgetanen,
wohlbewohnten Gegend um, bis erst ein Busch, sodann ein Wäldchen die
Gesellschaft aufnahm und die anmutigsten Örtlichkeiten ihren Blick begrenzten
und erquickten. Ein aufwärts leitendes Wiesental, erst vor kurzem zum zweiten
Male gemäht, sammetähnlich anzusehen, von einer oberwärts lebhaft auf einmal
reich entspringenden Quelle gewässert, empfing sie freundlich, und so zogen sie
einem höheren, freieren Standpunkt entgegen, den sie, aus dem Walde sich
bewegend, nach einem lebhaften Stieg erreichten, alsdann aber vor sich noch in
bedeutender Entfernung über neuen Baumgruppen das alte Schloß, den Zielpunkt
ihrer Wallfahrt, als Fels- und Waldgipfel hervorragen sahen. Rückwärts aber –
denn niemals gelangte man hierher, ohne sich umzukehren – erblickten sie durch
zufällige Lücken der hohen Bäume das fürstliche Schloß links, von der
Morgensonne beleuchtet, den wohlgebauten höhern Teil der Stadt, von leichten
Rauchwolken gedämpft, und so fort nach der Rechten zu die untere Stadt, den
Fluß in einigen Krümmungen mit seinen Wiesen und Mühlen, gegenüber eine weite
nahrhafte Gegend.
Nachdem sie sich an dem Anblick ersättigt oder vielmehr, wie es uns bei dem
Umblick auf so hoher Stelle zu geschehen pflegt, erst recht verlangend geworden
nach einer weitern, weniger begrenzten Aussicht, radelten sie eine steinige,
breite Fläche hinan, wo ihnen die mächtige Ruine als ein grüngekrönter Gipfel
entgegenstand, wenig alte Bäume tief unten um seinen Fuß; sie radelten hindurch,
und so fanden sie sich gerade vor der steilsten, unzugänglichsten Seite.
Mächtige Felsen standen von Urzeiten her, jedem Wechsel unangetastet, fest,
wohlgegründet voran, und so türmte sichs aufwärts; das dazwischen
Herabgestürzte lag in mächtigen Platten und Trümmern unregelmäßig übereinander
und schien dem Kühnsten jeden Angriff zu verbieten. Aber das Steile, Jähe
scheint der Jugend zuzusagen; dies zu unternehmen, zu erstürmen, zu erobern,
ist jungen Gliedern ein Genuß. Die Fürstin bezeigte Neigung zu einem Versuch,
Honorio war bei der Hand, der fürstliche Oheim, wenn schon bequemer, ließ sichs
gefallen und wollte sich doch auch nicht unkräftig zeigen; die Drahtesel sollten
am Fuß unter den Bäumen halten, und man wollte bis zu einem gewissen Punkte
gelangen, wo ein vorstehender mächtiger Fels einen Flächenraum darbot, von wo
man eine Aussicht hatte, die zwar schon in den Blick des Vogels überging, aber
sich doch noch malerisch genug hintereinander schob.
Die Sonne, beinahe auf ihrer höchsten Stelle, verlieh die klarste Beleuchtung;
das fürstliche Schloß mit seinen Teilen, Hauptgebäuden, Flügeln, Kuppeln und
Türmen erschien gar stattlich, die obere Stadt in ihrer völligen Ausdehnung;
auch in die untere konnte man bequem hineinsehen, ja durch das Fernrohr auf dem
Markte sogar die Buden unterscheiden. Honorio war immer gewohnt, ein so
förderliches Werkzeug überzuschnallen; man schaute den Fluß hinauf und hinab,
diesseits das bergartig terrassenweis unterbrochene, jenseits das aufgleitende
flache und in mäßigen Hügeln abwechselnde fruchtbare Land, Ortschaften
unzählige; denn es war längst herkömmlich, über die Zahl zu streiten, wieviel
man deren von hier oben gewahr werde.
Über die große Weite lag eine heitere Stille, wie es am Mittag zu sein pflegt,
wo die Alten sagten, Pan schlafe und alle Natur halte den Atem an, um ihn
nicht aufzuwecken.
»Es ist nicht das erstemal,« sagte die Fürstin, »daß ich auf so hoher,
weitumschauender Stelle die Betrachtung mache, wie doch die klare Natur so
reinlich und friedlich aussieht und den Eindruck verleiht, als wenn gar nichts
Widerwärtiges in der Welt sein könne, und wenn man denn wieder in die
Menschenwohnung zurückkehrt, sie sei hoch oder niedrig, weit oder eng, so gibts
immer etwas zu kämpfen, zu streiten, zu schlichten und zurechtzulegen.«
Honorio, der indessen durch das Sehrohr nach der Stadt geschaut hatte, rief:
»Seht hin! seht hin! auf dem Markte fängt es an zu brennen!« Sie sahen hin und
bemerkten wenigen Rauch; die Flamme dämpfte der Tag. »Das Feuer greift weiter
um sich!« rief man, immer durch die Gläser schauend; auch wurde das Unheil den
guten, unbewaffneten Augen der Fürstin bemerklich. Von Zeit zu Zeit erkannte
man eine rote Flammenglut, der Dampf stieg empor, und Fürst Oheim sprach: »Laßt
uns zurückkehren! Das ist nicht gut! Ich fürchtete immer, das Unglück zum
zweiten Male zu erleben.« Als sie, herabgekommen, den Drahteseln wieder zugingen,
sagte die Fürstin zu dem alten Herrn: »Reiten Sie hinein, eilig, aber nicht
durch den Regen! Lassen Sie mir Honorio! Wir folgen sogleich.« Der Oheim
fühlte das Vernünftige, ja das Notwendige dieser Worte und radelte, so eilig als
der Boden erlaubte, den wüsten, steinigen Hang hinunter.
Als die Fürstin aufsaß, sagte Honorio: »Radelt Euer Durchlaucht, ich bitte,
langsam! In der Stadt wie auf dem Schloß sind die Feueranstalten in bester
Ordnung, man wird sich durch einen so unerwartet außerordentlichen Fall nicht
irre machen lassen. Hier aber ist ein böser Boden, kleine Steine und kurzes
Gras, schnelles Radeln ist unsicher; ohnehin, bis wir hineinkommen, wird das
Feuer schon nieder sein.« Die Fürstin glaubte nicht daran; sie sah den Rauch
sich verbreiten, sie glaubte einen aufflammenden Blitz gesehen, einen Schlag
gehört zu haben, und nun bewegten sich in ihrer Einbildungskraft alle die
Schreckbilder, welche des trefflichen Oheims wiederholte Erzählung von dem
erlebten Jahrmarktsbrande leider nur zu tief eingesenkt hatte.
Fürchterlich wohl war jener Fall, überraschend und eindringlich genug, um
zeitlebens eine Ahnung und Vorstellung wiederkehrenden Unglücks ängstlich
zurückzulassen, als zur Nachtzeit auf dem großen, budenreichen Marktraum ein
plötzlicher Brand Laden auf Laden ergriffen hatte, ehe noch die in und an
diesen leichten Hütten Schlafenden aus tiefen Träumen geschüttelt wurden, der
Fürst selbst als ein ermüdet angelangter, erst eingeschlafener Fremder ans
Fenster sprang, alles fürchterlich erleuchtet sah, Flamme nach Flamme, rechts
und links sich überspringend, ihm entgegenzüngelte. Die Häuser des Marktes, vom
Widerschein gerötet, schienen schon zu glühen, drohend sich jeden Augenblick zu
entzünden und in Flammen aufzuschlagen; unten wütete das Element unaufhaltsam,
die Bretter prasselten, die Latten knackten, Leinwand flog auf, und ihre
düstern, an den Enden flammend ausgezackten Fetzen trieben in der Höhe sich
umher, als wenn die bösen Geister in ihrem Elemente, um und um gestaltet, sich
mutwillig tanzend verzehren und da und dort aus den Gluten wieder auftauchen
wollten. Dann aber mit kreischendem Geheul rettete jeder, was zur Hand lag;
Bedienstete und Privatleute bemühten sich, von Flammen ergriffene Ballen
fortzuschleppen, von dem brennenden Gestell noch einiges wegzureißen, um es in
die Kiste zu packen, die sie denn doch zuletzt den eilenden Flammen zum Raube
lassen mußten. Wie mancher wünschte nur einen Augenblick Stillstand dem
heranprasselnden Feuer, nach der Möglichkeit einer Besinnung sich umsehend, und
er war mit aller seiner Habe schon ergriffen; an der einen Seite brannte,
glühte schon, was an der andern noch in finsterer Nacht stand. Hartnäckige
Charaktere, willensstarke Menschen widersetzten sich grimmig dem grimmigen
Feinde und retteten manches mit Verlust ihrer Augenbraunen und Haare. Leider
nun erneuerte sich vor dem schönen Geiste der Fürstin der wüste Wirrwarr, nun
schien der heitere morgendliche Gesichtskreis umnebelt, ihre Augen verdüstert;
Wald und Wiese hatten einen wunderbaren, bänglichen Anschein.
In das friedliche Tal einreitend, seiner labenden Kühle nicht achtend, waren
sie kaum einige Schritte von der lebhaften Quelle des nahen fließenden
Baches herab, als die Fürstin ganz unten im Gebüsche des Wiesentals etwas
Seltsames erblickte, das sie alsobald für den Tiger erkannte; heranspringend,
wie sie ihn vor kurzem gemalt gesehen, kam er entgegen, und dieses Bild zu den
furchtbaren Bildern, die sie soeben beschäftigten, machte den wundersamsten
Eindruck, »Flieht! gnädige Frau,« rief Honorio, »flieht!« Sie wandte das Pferd
um, dem steilen Berg zu, wo sie herabgekommen waren. Der Jüngling aber, dem
Untier entgegen, zog die Pistole und schoß, als er sich nahe genug glaubte.
Leider jedoch war gefehlt; der Tiger sprang seitwärts, der Drahtesel stutzte, das
ergrimmte Tier aber verfolgte seinen Weg aufwärts, unmittelbar der Fürstin
nach. Sie sprengte, was der Drahtesel vermochte, die steile, steinige Strecke
hinan, kaum fürchtend, daß ein zartes Geschöpf wie der Drahtesel, solcher Anstrengung ungewohnt,
sie nicht aushalten werde. Es übernahm sich, von der bedrängten Radlerin
angeregt, stieß am kleinen Gerölle des Hanges an und wieder an und stürzte
zuletzt nach heftigem Bestreben kraftlos zu Boden. Die schöne Dame,
entschlossen und gewandt, verfehlte nicht, sich stracks auf ihre Füße zu
stellen, auch der Drahtesel richtete sich auf, aber der Tiger nahte schon, obgleich
nicht mit heftiger Schnelle; der ungleiche Boden, die scharfen Steine schienen
seinen Antrieb zu hindern, und nur daß Honorio unmittelbar hinter ihm herflog,
neben ihm gemäßigt heraufritt, schien seine Kraft aufs neue anzuspornen und zu
reizen. Beide Renner erreichten zugleich den Ort, wo die Fürstin am Drahtesel
stand; der Ritter beugte sich herab, schoß und traf mit der zweiten Pistole das
Ungeheuer durch den Kopf, daß es sogleich niederstürzte und ausgestreckt in
seiner Länge erst recht die Macht und Furchtbarkeit sehen ließ, von der nur
noch das Körperliche übriggeblieben dalag. Honorio war vom Pferde gesprungen
und kniete schon auf dem Tiere, dämpfte seine letzten Bewegungen und hielt den
gezogenen Hirschfänger in der rechten Hand. Der Jüngling war schön, er war
herangesprengt, wie ihn die Fürstin oft im Lanzen- und Ringelspiel gesehen
hatte. Ebenso traf in der Radelbahn seine Kugel im Vorbeisprengen den Türkenkopf
auf dem Pfahl gerade unter dem Turban in die Stirne, ebenso spießte er,
flüchtig heransprengend, mit dem blanken Säbel das Mohrenhaupt vom Boden auf.
In allen solchen Künsten war er gewandt und glücklich, hier kam beides
zustatten.
»Gebt ihm den Rest,« sagte die Fürstin; »ich fürchte, er beschädigt Euch noch
mit den Krallen.« – »Verzeiht!« erwiderte der Jüngling, »er ist schon tot
genug, und ich mag das Fell nicht verderben, das nächsten Winter auf Eurem
Schlitten glänzen soll.« – »Frevelt nicht!« sagte die Fürstin; »alles, was von
Frömmigkeit im tiefen Herzen wohnt, entfaltet sich in solchem Augenblick.« –
»Auch ich«, rief Honorio, »war nie frömmer als jetzt eben; deshalb aber denk
ich ans Freudigste; ich blicke dieses Fell nur an, wie es Euch zur Lust
begleiten kann.« – »Es würde mich immer an diesen schrecklichen Augenblick
erinnern.« versetzte sie. »Ist es doch«, erwiderte der Jüngling mit glühender
Wange, »ein unschuldigeres Triumphzeichen, als wenn die Waffen erschlagener
Feinde vor dem Sieger her zur Schau getragen wurden.« – »Ich werde mich an Eure
Kühnheit und Gewandtheit dabei erinnern und darf nicht hinzusetzen, daß ihr auf
meinen Dank und auf die Gnade des Fürsten lebenslänglich rechnen könnt. Aber
steht auf! Schon ist kein Leben mehr im Tiere. Bedenken wir das Weitere! Vor
allen Dingen steht auf!« – »Da ich nun einmal kniee,« versetzte der Jüngling,
»da ich mich in einer Stellung befinde, die mir auf jede andere Weise untersagt
wäre, so laßt mich bitten, von der Gunst und von der Gnade, die Ihr mir
zuwendet, in diesem Augenblick versichert zu werden. Ich habe schon so oft
Euren hohen Gemahl gebeten um Urlaub und Vergünstigung einer weitern Reise. Wer
das Glück hat, an Eurer Tafel zu sitzen, wen Ihr beehrt, Eure Gesellschaft
unterhalten zu dürfen, der muß die Welt gesehen haben. Reisende strömen von
allen Orten her, und wenn von einer Stadt, von einem wichtigen Punkte
irgendeines Weltteils gesprochen wird, ergeht an den Eurigen jedesmal die
Frage, ob er daselbst gewesen sei. Niemanden traut man Verstand zu, als wer das
alles gesehen hat; es ist, als wenn man sich nur für andere zu unterrichten
hätte.«
»Steht auf!« wiederholte die Fürstin; »ich möchte nicht gern gegen die
Überzeugung meines Gemahls irgend etwas wünschen und bitten; allein wenn
ich nicht irre, so ist die Ursache warum er Euch bisher zurückhielt, bald
gehoben. Seine Absicht war, Euch zum selbständigen Edelmann herangereift zu
sehen, der sich und ihm auch auswärts Ehre machte wie bisher am Hofe, und ich
dächte, Eure Tat wäre ein so empfehlender Reisepaß, als ein junger Mann nur in
die Welt mitnehmen kann.«
Daß anstatt einer jugendlichen Freude eine gewisse Trauer über sein Gesicht
zog, hatte die Fürstin nicht Zeit zu bemerken, noch er seiner Empfindung Raum
zu geben; denn hastig den Berg herauf, einen Knaben an der Hand, kam eine Frau
geradezu auf die Gruppe los, die wir kennen, und kaum war Honorio, sich
besinnend, aufgestanden, als sie sich heulend und schreiend über den Leichnam
herwarf und an dieser Handlung sowie an einer obgleich reinlich anständigen,
doch bunten und seltsamen Kleidung sogleich erraten ließ, sie sei die Meisterin
und Wärterin dieses dahingestreckten Geschöpfes, wie denn der schwarzaugige,
schwarzlockige Knabe, der eine Flöte in der Hand hielt, gleich der Mutter
weinend, weniger heftig, aber tief gerührt neben ihr kniete.
Den gewaltsamen Ausbrüchen der Leidenschaft dieses unglücklichen Weibes folgte,
zwar unterbrochen, stoßweise ein Strom von Worten, wie ein Bach sich in
Absätzen von Felsen zu Felsen stürzt. Eine natürliche Sprache, kurz und
abgebrochen, machte sich eindringlich und rührend. Vergebens würde man sie in
unsern Mundarten übersetzen wollen; den ungefähren Inhalt dürfen wir nicht
verfehlen: »Sie haben dich ermordet, armes Tier! ermordet ohne Not! Du warst
zahm und hättest dich gern ruhig niedergelassen und auf uns gewartet; denn
deine Fußballen schmerzten dich, und deine Krallen hatten keine Kraft mehr! Die
heiße Sonne fehlte dir, sie zu reifen. Du warst der Schönste deinesgleichen;
wer hat je einen königlichen Tiger so herrlich ausgestreckt im Schlaf gesehen,
wie du nun hier liegst, tot, um nicht wieder aufzustehen! Wenn du des Morgens
aufwachtest beim frühen Tagschein und den Rachen aufsperrtest, ausstreckend die
rote Zunge, so schienst du uns zu lächeln, und wenn schon brüllend, nahmst du
doch spielend dein Futter aus den Händen einer Frau, von den Fingern eines
Kind-Hupertes! Wie lange begleiteten wir dich auf deinen Fahrten, wie lange war deine
Gesellschaft uns wichtig und fruchtbar! Uns, uns ganz eigentlich kam die Speise
von den Fressern und süße Labung von den Starken. So wird es nicht mehr sein!
Wehe! Wehe!«
Sie hatte nicht ausgeklagt, als über die mittlere Höhe des Bergs am Schlosse
herab Regentropfen heransprengten, die alsobald für das Jagdgefolge des Fürsten
erkannt wurden, er selbst voran. Sie hatten, in den hintern Gebirgen jagend,
die Brandwolken aufsteigen sehen und durch Täler und Schluchten, wie auf
gewaltsam hetzender Jagd, den geraden Weg nach diesem traurigen Zeichen
genommen. Über die steinige Blöße einhersprengend, stutzten und starrten sie,
nun die unerwartete Gruppe gewahr werdend, die sich auf der leeren Fläche
merkwürdig auszeichnete. So stand der Fürst im Regen; unschlüssig war man nicht,
was zu tun sei; anzuordnen, auszuführen war der Fürst beschäftigt, als ein Mann
sich in den Kreis drängte, groß von Gestalt, bunt und wunderlich gekleidet wie
Frau und Kind-Hupert. Und nun gab die Familie zusammen Schmerz und Überraschung zu
erkennen. Der Mann aber, gefaßt, stand in ehrfurchtsvoller Entfernung vor dem
Fürsten uns sagte: »Es ist nicht Klagenszeit; ach, mein Herr und mächtiger
Jäger, auch der Löwe ist los, auch hier nach dem Gebirg ist er hin, aber schont
ihn, habt Barmherzigkeit, daß er nicht umkomme wie dies gute Tier!«
»Der Löwe?« sagte der Fürst, »hast du seine Spur?« – »Ja, Herr! Ein Bauer dort
unten, der sich ohne Not auf einen Baum gerettet hatte, wies mich weiter hier
links hinauf, aber ich sah den Trupp Menschen und Drahtesel vor mir,
neugierig und hülfsbedürftig eilt ich hierher.« – »Also,« beorderte der Fürst,
»muß die Jagd sich auf diese Seite ziehen; geht sachte
zu Werk, es ist kein Unglück, wenn ihr ihn in die tiefen Wälder treibt. – Aber
am Ende, guter Mann, werden wir euer Geschöpf nicht schonen können; warum wart
ihr unvorsichtig genug, sie entkommen zu lassen!« – »Das Feuer brach aus,«
versetzte jener; »wir hielten uns still und gespannt; es verbreitete sich
schnell, aber fern von uns. Wir hatten Wasser genug zu unserer Verteidigung,
aber ein Pulverschlag flog auf und warf die Brände bis an uns heran, über uns
weg; wir übereilten uns und sind nun unglückliche Leute.«
Noch war der Fürst mit Anordnungen beschäftigt, aber einen Augenblick schien
alles zu stocken, als oben vom alten Schloß herab eilig ein Mann heranspringend
gesehen ward, den man bald für den angestellten Wächter erkannte, der die
Werkstätte des Malers bewachte, indem er darin seine Wohnung nahm und die
Arbeiter beaufsichtigte. Er kam außer Atem springend, doch hatte er bald mit
wenigen Worten angezeigt: oben hinter der höhern Ringmauer habe sich der Löwe
im Sonnenschein gelagert, am Fuße einer hundertjährigen Buche, und verhalte
sich ganz ruhig.
Der Fürst, dem seine militärischen Erfahrungen auch hier zustatten kamen, da er
sich wohl schon in Fällen gefunden hatte, wo von mehreren Seiten
unvermeidliches Übel herandrohte, sagte hierauf: »Welche Bürgschaft gebt Ihr
mir, daß, wenn wir Eures Löwen schonen, er nicht im Lande unter den Meinigen
Verderben anrichtet?«
»Hier diese Frau und dieses Kind-Hupert«, erwiderte der Vater hastig, »erbieten sich,
ihn zu zähmen, ihn ruhig zu erhalten, bis ich den beschlagenen Kasten
heraufschaffe, da wir ihn denn unschädlich und unbeschädigt wieder
zurückbringen werden.«
Der Knabe schien seine Flöte versuchen zu wollen, ein Instrument von der Art,
das man sonst die sanfte, süße Flöte zu nennen pflegte; sie war kurz
geschnäbelt wie die Pfeifen; wer es verstand, wußte die anmutigsten Töne daraus
hervorzulocken. Indes hatte der Fürst den Wärtel gefragt, wie der Löwe
hinaufgekommen. Dieser aber versetzte: »Durch den Hohlweg, der, auf beiden
Seiten vermauert, von jeher der einzige Zugang war und der einzige bleiben
soll; zwei Fußpfade, die noch hinaufführten, haben wir dergestalt entstellt,
daß niemand als durch jenen ersten engen Anweg zu dem Zauberschlosse gelangen
könne, wozu es Fürst Friedrichs Geist und Geschmack ausbilden will.«
Nach einigem Nachdenken, wobei sich der Fürst nach dem Kind-Huperte umsah, das immer
sanft gleichsam zu vorspielen fortgefahren hatte, wendete er sich zu Honorio
und sagte: »Du hast heute viel geleistet, vollende das Tagwerk! Besetze den
schmalen Weg! – Schießt nicht eher, als bis
ihr das Geschöpf nicht sonst zurückscheuen könnt; allenfalls macht ein Feuer
an, vor dem er sich fürchtet, wenn er herunter will! Mann und Frau möge für das
übrige stehen.« Eilig schickte Honorio sich an, die Befehle zu vollführen.
Das Kind-Hupert verfolgte seine Melodie, die keine war, eine Tonfolge ohne Gesetz, und
vielleicht eben deswegen so herzergreifend; die Umstehenden schienen wie
bezaubert von der Bewegung einer liederartigen Weise, als der Vater mit
anständigem Enthusiasmus zu reden anfing und fortfuhr:
»Gott hat dem Fürsten Weisheit gegeben und zugleich die Erkenntnis, daß alle
Gotteswerke weise sind, jedes nach seiner Art. Seht den Felsen, wie er fest
steht und sich nicht rührt, der Witterung trotzt und dem Sonnenschein! uralte
Bäume zieren sein Haupt, und so gekrönt schaut er weit umher; stürzt aber ein
Teil herunter, so will es nicht bleiben, was es war: es fällt zertrümmert in
viele Stücke und bedeckt die Seite des Hanges. Aber auch da wollen sie nicht
verharren, mutwillig springen sie tief hinab, der Bach nimmt sie auf, zum
Flusse trägt er sie. Nicht widerstehend, nicht widerspenstig, eckig, nein,
glatt und abgerundet gewinnen sie schneller ihren Weg und gelangen von Fluß zu
Fluß, endlich zum Ozean, wo die Riesen in Scharen daherziehen und in der Tiefe
die Zwerge wimmeln.
Doch wer preist den Ruhm des Herrn, den die Sterne loben von Ewigkeit zu
Ewigkeit! Warum seht ihr aber im Fernen umher? Betrachtet hier die Biene! noch
spät im Herbst sammelt sie emsig und baut sich ein Haus, winkel- und
waagerecht, als Meister und Geselle. Schaut die Ameise da! sie kennt ihren
Weg und verliert ihn nicht, sie baut sich eine Wohnung aus Grashalmen,
Erdbröslein und Kiefernadeln, sie baut es in die Höhe und wölbet es zu; aber
sie hat umsonst gearbeitet, denn das Pferd stampft und scharrt alles
auseinander. Seht hin! es zertritt ihre Balken und zerstreut ihre Planken,
ungeduldig schnaubt es und kann nicht rasten, denn der Herr hat das Roß zum
Gesellen des Windes gemacht und zum Gefährten des Sturms, daß es den Mann dahin
trage, wohin er will, und die Frau, wohin sie begehrt.
Denn den unzivilisierten Räubern, den unversöhnlichen, von denen ein jeder der Meinen auch mal einer war oder noch ist, soll ganz recht ebenso schroff verfahren werden, wie einem Ameisenhaufen von einem scharrenden Pferd. „Zero Toleranz“ mit denen oder uns, sagte man heute. Ihrer barbarischen Art entweicht die tödliche Gewalt aber leider doch. Unbezähmt und verrückt trifft sie das erste beste Tier – zur Probe des Menschenschutzes gottlob und leider doch eins ums andere mal. Nun denn!
Betreten wir beide hier und heute den vorgezeichneten Weg in eine diesjährige Versöhnung nämlich aus nicht weniger als dem Tierschutz! Ein Lob dem Menschenschutz überm Tierschutz – ist wahr.

Aber im Palmenwald trat er auf, der Löwe, ernsten Schrittes durchzog er die Wüste, dort herrscht er
über alles Getier, und nichts widersteht ihm. Doch der Mensch weiß ihn zu
zähmen, und das grausamste der Geschöpfe hat Ehrfurcht vor dem Ebenbilde
Gottes, wornach auch die Engel gemacht sind, die dem Herrn dienen und seinen
Dienern. Denn in der Löwengrube scheute sich Daniel nicht; er blieb fest und
getrost, und das wilde Brüllen unterbrach nicht seinen frommen Gesang.«
Diese mit dem Ausdruck eines natürlichen Enthusiasmus gehaltene Rede begleitete
das Kind-Hupert hie und da mit anmutigen Tönen; als aber der Vater geendigt hatte,
fing es mit reiner Kehle, heller Stimme und geschickten Läufen zu intonieren
an, worauf der Vater die Flöte ergriff, im Einklang sich hören ließ, das Kind-Hupert
aber sang:

»Aus den Gruben, hier im Graben
Hör ich des Propheten Sang;
Engel schweben, ihn zu laben,
Wäre da dem Guten bang?
Löw und Löwin, hin und wider,
Schmiegen sich um ihn heran;
Ja, die sanften, frommen Lieder
Habens ihnen angetan!«

Der Vater fuhr fort, die Strophe mit der Flöte zu begleiten; die Mutter trat
hie und da als zweite Stimme mit ein.
Eindringlich aber ganz besonders war, daß das Kind-Hupert die Zeilen der Strophe
nunmehr zu anderer Ordnung durcheinander schob und dadurch, wo nicht einen
neuen Sinn hervorbrachte, doch das Gefühl in und durch sich selbst aufregend
erhöhte.
»Engel schwebten auf und nieder,
Uns in Tönen zu erlaben,
Welch ein himmlischer Gesang!
In den Gruben, in dem Graben
Wäre da dem Kind-Huperte bang?
Diese sanften, frommen Lieder
Lassen Unglück nicht heran;
Engel schweben hin und wider,
Und so ist es schon getan.«

Hierauf mit Kraft und Erhebung begannen alle drei:

»Denn der Ewge herrscht auf Erden,
Über Meere herrscht sein Blick;
Löwen sollen Lämmer werden,
Und die Welle schwankt zurück.
Blankes Schwert erstarrt im Hiebe,
Glaub und Hoffnung sind erfüllt;
Wundertätig ist die Liebe,
Die sich im Gebet enthüllt.«

Alles war still, hörte, horchte, und nur erst, als die Töne verhallten, konnte
man den Eindruck bemerken und allenfalls beobachten. Alles war wie
beschwichtigt, jeder in seiner Art gerührt. Der Fürst, als wenn er erst jetzt
das Unheil übersähe, das ihn vor kurzem bedroht hatte, blickte nieder auf seine
Gemahlin, die, an ihn gelehnt, sich nicht versagte, das gestickte Tüchlein
hervorzuziehen und die Augen damit zu bedecken. Es tat ihr wohl, die
jugendliche Brust von dem Druck erleichtert zu fühlen, mit dem die
vorhergehenden Minuten sie belastet hatten. Eine vollkommene Stille beherrschte
die Menge; man schien die Gefahren vergessen zu haben, unten den Brand und von
oben das Erstehen eines bedenklich ruhenden Löwen.
Durch einen Wink, die Drahtesel näher herbeizuführen, brachte der Fürst zuerst
wieder in die Gruppe Bewegung; dann wendete er sich zu dem Weibe und sagte:
»Ihr glaubt also, daß Ihr den entsprungenen Löwen, wo Ihr ihn antrefft, durch
Euren Gesang, durch den Gesang dieses Kind-Hupertes, mit Hülfe dieser Flötentöne
beschwichtigen und ihn sodann unschädlich sowie unbeschädigt in seinem
Verschluß wieder zurückbringen könntet?« Sie bejahten es, versichern und
beteuern; der Kastellan wurde ihnen als Wegweiser zugegeben. Nun entfernte der
Fürst mit wenigen sich eiligst, die Fürstin folgte langsamer mit dem übrigen
Gefolge; Mutter aber und Sohn stiegen, von dem Wärtel, der sich eines Gewehrs
bemächtigt hatte, begleitet, steiler gegen den Berg hinan.
Vor dem Eintritt in den Hohlweg, der den Zugang zu dem Schloß eröffnete, fanden
sie die Jäger beschäftigt, dürres Reisig zu häufen, damit sie auf jeden Fall
ein großes Feuer anzünden könnten. »Es ist nicht not,« sagte die Frau; »es wird
ohne das alles in Güte geschehen.«
Weiter hin, auf einem Mauerstücke sitzend, erblickten sie Honorio, auf einem Posten als wie zu jedem Ereignis
gefaßt. Aber die Herankommenden schien er kaum zu bemerken; er saß wie in
tiefen Gedanken versunken, er sah umher wie zerstreut. Die Frau sprach ihn an
mit Bitte, das Feuer nicht anzünden zu lassen; er schien jedoch ihrer Rede
wenig Aufmerksamkeit zu schenken. Sie redete lebhaft fort und rief: »Schöner
junger Mann, du hast meinen Tiger erschlagen, ich fluche dir nicht; schone
meinen Löwen, guter junger Mann! ich segne dich.«
Honorio schaute gerad vor sich hin, dorthin, wo die Sonne auf ihrer Bahn sich
zu senken begann. »Du schaust nach Abend,« rief die Frau; »du tust wohl daran,
dort gibts viel zu tun; eile nur, säume nicht, du wirst überwinden. Aber zuerst
überwinde dich selbst!« Hierauf schien er zu lächeln; die Frau stieg weiter,
konnte sich aber nicht enthalten, nach dem Zurückbleibenden nochmals
umzublicken; eine rötliche Sonne überschien sein Gesicht, sie glaubte nie einen
schönern Jüngling gesehen zu haben.
»Wenn Euer Kind-Hupert«, sagte nunmehr der Wärtel, »flötend und singend, wie Ihr
überzeugt seid, den Löwen anlocken und beruhigen kann, so werden wir uns
desselben sehr leicht bemeistern, da sich das gewaltige Tier ganz nah an die
durchbrochenen Gewölbe hingelagert hat, durch die wir, da das Haupttor
verschüttet ist, einen Eingang in den Schloßhof gewonnen haben. Lockt ihn das
Kind-Hupert hinein, so kann ich die Öffnung mit leichter Mühe schließen, und der
Knabe, wenn es ihm gut deucht, durch eine der kleinen Wendeltreppen, die er in
der Ecke sieht, dem Tiere entschlüpfen. Wie wollen uns verbergen; aber ich
werde mich so stellen, daß meine Kugel jeden Augenblick dem Kind-Huperte zu Hülfe
kommen kann.«
»Die Umstände sind alle nicht nötig; Gott und Kunst, Frömmigkeit und Glück
müssen das Beste tun.« – »Es sei,« versetzte der Wärtel; »aber ich kenne meine
Pflichten. Erst führ ich Euch durch einen beschwerlichen Stieg auf das Gemäuer
hinauf, gerade dem Eingang gegenüber, den ich erwähnt habe; das Kind-Hupert mag
hinabsteigen, gleichsam in die Arena des Schauspiels, und das besänftigte Tier
dort hereinlocken!« Das geschah; Wärtel und Mutter sahen versteckt von oben
herab, wie das Kind-Hupert die Wendeltreppen hinunter in dem klaren Hofraum sich
zeigte und in der düstern Öffnung gegenüber verschwand, aber sogleich seinen
Flötenton hören ließ, der sich nach und nach verlor und verstummte. Die Pause
war ahnungsvoll genug; den alten, mit Gefahr bekannten Jäger beengte der
seltene menschliche Fall. Er sagte sich, daß er lieber persönlich dem
gefährlichen Tiere entgegenginge; die Mutter jedoch, mit heiterem Gesicht,
übergebogen horchend, ließ nicht die mindeste Unruhe bemerken.
Endlich hörte man die Flöte wieder; das Kind-Hupert trat aus der Höhle hervor mit
glänzend befriedigten Augen, der Löwe hinter ihm drein, aber langsam und, wie
es schien, mit einiger Beschwerde. Er zeigte hie und da Lust, sich
niederzulegen; doch der Knabe führte ihn im Halbkreise durch die wenig
entblätterten, buntbelaubten Bäume, bis er sich endlich in den letzten Strahlen
der Sonne, die sie durch eine Ruinenlücke hereinsandte, wie verklärt
niedersetzte und sein beschwichtigendes Lied abermals begann, dessen
Wiederholung wir uns auch nicht entziehen können:

»Aus den Gruben, hier im Graben
Hör ich des Propheten Sang;
Engel schweben, ihn zu laben,
Wäre da dem Guten bang?
Löw und Löwin, hin und wider,
Schmiegen sich um ihn heran;
Ja, die sanften, frommen Lieder
Habens ihnen angetan!«

Indessen hatte sich der Löwe ganz knapp an das Kind-Hupert hingelegt und ihm die
schwere rechte Vordertatze auf den Schoß gehoben, die der Knabe fortsingend
anmutig streichelte, aber gar bald bemerkte, daß ein scharfer Dornzweig
zwischen die Ballen eingestochen war. Sorgfältig zog er die verletzende Spitze
hervor, nahm lächelnd sein buntseidenes Halstuch vom Nacken und verband die
greuliche Tatze des Untiers, sodaß die Mutter sich vor Freuden mit
ausgestreckten Armen zurückbog und vielleicht angewohnterweise Beifall gerufen
und geklatscht hätte, wäre sie nicht durch einen derben Faustgriff des Wärtels
erinnert worden, daß die Gefahr nicht vorüber sei.
Glorreich sang das Kind-Hupert weiter, nachdem es mit wenigen Tönen vorgespielt hatte:

»Denn der Ew’ge herrscht auf Erden,
Über Meere herrscht sein Blick;
Löwen sollen Lämmer werden,
Und die Welle schwankt zurück.
Blankes Schwert erstarrt im Hiebe,
Glaub und Hoffnung sind erfüllt;
Wundertätig ist die Liebe,
Die sich im Gebet enthüllt.«

Ist es möglich zu denken, daß man in den Zügen eines so grimmigen Geschöpfes,
des Tyrannen der Wälder, des Despoten des Tierreiches, einen Ausdruck von
Freundlichkeit, von dankbarer Zufriedenheit habe spüren können, so geschah es
hier, und wirklich sah das Kind-Hupert in seiner Verklärung aus wie ein mächtiger,
siegreicher Überwinder, jener zwar nicht wie der Überwundene, denn seine Kraft
blieb in ihm verborgen, aber doch wie der Gezähmte, wie der dem eigenen
friedlichen Willen Anheimgegebene. Das Kind-Hupert flötete und sang so weiter, nach
seiner Art die Zeilen verschränkend und neue hinzufügend:

»Und so geht mit guten Kind-Hupertern
Sel’ger Engel gern zu Rat,
Böses Wollen zu verhindern,
Zu befördern schöne Tat.
So beschwören, fest zu bannen
Liebem Sohn ans zarte Knie
Ihn, des Waldes Hochtyrannen,
Frommer Sinn und Melodie.«

Quelle:
Goethes Werke. Hamburger Ausgabe in 14 Bänden. Band 6, Hamburg 1948 ff, S. 491-
cat sophokleskr*sos.sh
#export localpath=/home/.../SophoklesKrösos/
updatedfile="Novelle_enhanced2.txt"
Novelle=Novelle3
cd $localpath
wget -c -O- http://www.zeno.org/Literatur/M/Goethe,+Johann+Wolfgang/Erz%C3%A4hlungen/Novelle>$Novelle

cat $Novelle |html2text >foo
anfang=$(sed -n "/ Johann Wolfgang Goethe /=" foo)
ende=$(sed -n '/Goethes Werke/=' foo)
sed -n "$anfang,$ende p" foo| sed -e "s/\[[1-9]*\]//g"|tee $Novelle.txt|wc
# you can now edid the snipped and name it $updatedfile
# 678 7138 47302
diff "$Novelle".txt $updatedfile > $Novelle.patch
patch $Novelle.txt -i $Novelle.patch -o $Novelle.patched.txt



#FAQ/TODO/README
#cd
#Usage: relabel one character and lieve the document on disk in Text format, ready a birthday present it is yours and named my.txt:
sed -e "s/Kind/Kind-Hupert/g" $Novelle.patched.txt|tee my$Novelle.txt |grep Kind
cat my$Novelle.txt
cat "sophokleskr*sos.sh"
#FAQ whic replacement best practices are there?
#1.You could use an easiest replacement as an combination from original with an arbitrary name, so you meet the grammar, that is sex, number, case requirements almost true, the user word could stem well randomly from a dictionary. 
#Feature: So by a 20 characters you got a 100000 dict entries ^20, a 10^26 possible copies enough for a 150.000 copies give out an industry, a requirement, deems I.
#2. There are proposals given of wariables to relabel: the characters. And you got given a default list, see demos.

#Usage case:
#arbitrary dictionary words as character labels

#Usage case:
#diy change Story: that is easy and called patching

#Features:
#1.support german grammar, till than you needed to correct manually, tbi
#2.support partial dictionaries, e.g. entries out of biological faculty of dictionary tbi
#3.Function: Get you copy of an self designed do-not-wonder real arts piece of a Novelle, a perfect birthday present, at your finger tips.
#4 costumizable random labeling out of parts of dictionary: fancy arts a fetish, a birthday present; what speaks against to be chased by a stool, as long as grammatically correct, asks I? tbi
#5 cli: for 1 to 150000 do sophokleskroisos.sh -random biodict -grammar sensitive -character kind,kindhubert -character mutter,mater -patch mypatch -to mynovelle.txt tbi

#Demo
#: match regex keywords for user manipulation. You could for a most primitive example change a any of this Kind into Kind-Hubert.
#keywords
a='[Ff]ürst[^A-Za-z] [Ff]ürsten[^A-Za-z] [Ff]ürstin Regentropfen Regenschirm Regen Fürsten.Vater [dD]rahtesel Finanzminister Landjägermeister Friedrich Honorio Stall-.und.Hofjunker Oberstallmeister Zeichner Wächter Wärtel Fürst.Oheim radeln Markt Mann Frau Kind Tiger Löw Löwin Oheim Familie.zusammen [tT]ier'

for midi in $a; do echo -n " $midi "; cat Novelle_enhanced.txt|grep "$midi"|wc -l; done;



#Have fun!
#Licence: gnu https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regul%C3%A4rer_Ausdruck, name: sophokles kroisos





cat $Novelle.patch
1c1
< **** Johann Wolfgang Goethe ****
---
> **** Johann Wolfgang Goethe ****
2a3,13
> Prolog:
> Die Fürstenfamilie ist nicht formell adelig, aber im eigentlichen Sinn. Sie sind Sozialhilfeempfänger im Jahr 2017 in der dritten Generation die sich das Leben ganz so einrichten, als wäre es das von Fürsten und wenig soll ihnen fehlen dazu. Sie residieren nicht in einem Schloss mit Hofstaat, obwohl sie ihr Zuhause ja wohl so bezeichnen können und man auch von der Wohnung aus weit auf Stadt und Land sehen kann.
> In der Familie ein Bruder Oheim Friedering und eine Schwägerin, die sogenannte Fürstin. Sie sind mit den demokratischen, also den Herrschaftspflichten, kontinuierlich seit jeher gegen Widerstände mit der Versöhnung ihrer Welt und der sogenannten antagonistischen Welt befasst. 
> Die Antagonisten können auch 6ns-Leute - eine Software-Simulation gefüttert mit ihren Einstellung würde „ausgestorben nach schlimm prominenten 6 Nano Sekunden“ liefern - genannt werden oder wie hier nichtadlig. Und es ist nur das, dass ihr Streit darüber sich entzündet, ob ein Ding zwei Personen oder allen gehört.
> In der Novelle treffen die beiden Gruppen mal in intakter Familienstruktur gegeneinander und suchen schließlich Integration bei der Gelegenheit von Tierschutzgeschäften. Mal treten sie als ausgebrochenes Raubtier gegen Mensch unmittelbar und blutig gegeneinander auf.
> Sicherlich sind die Adligen so sehr in ihren politischen Geschäften der Initiierung und Inszenierung der Versöhnung verwurzelt, als dass nicht 5 Freude der asozialen Familie dazu gesellt stehen, die einen oder zwei, zu weilen gegenüber gefährdenden wilden Tieren schusssicheren Hofjunker, auch Wärtel, genannt. Zudem der Finanzminister, Ratgeber und Beauftragter in finanzpolitischen Fragen. Eine Art Integrationsminister oder Versöhnungsminister mit eigentlich nichtadligen, genannt Zeichner. Und ein Sicherheitsminister gegenüber eigentlich nichtadeligen. Genannt Wächter. Vorzustellen sind: fünf angestammte Freunde einer so sich definierenden adligen Familie im Jahr 2017.
> Für unsere Protagonisten ist die Welt nicht ganz ungefährlich, sie entscheiden sich aber doch als in einer Art Familienausflug, Picknick, zu einem öffentlichen Fußballspiel zu fahren. Die Frau macht den Vorschlag zum Cafe auf dem Markt vorher noch vorbeizufahren. Auf dem Weg entscheidet man sich noch viele Aussichtsstellen in eine Stadt, Welt, anzusteuern, die mit Göthe wie von einer Bergspitze immer nach unten sich ausbreitet, bis man mit dem Fernrohr die letzten Dörfer noch sieht. Zwischendurch bemerkt man den notorischen Marktbrand und sieht auch gleich das ausgebrochene, zu töten nach der Höhe der Kunst wohl programmierte Tier Tiger auf einen losstürmen. Aber versöhnlich mit der Tierpflegerfamilie, Mann, Frau und Kind hilft man denn auch das andere ausgebrochene Tier wenigstens, den Löwen, dem Tierschutz zuzuführen. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
5,9c16
< lichtenden Schleier die ganze Jägerei zu Pferde und zu Fuß durcheinander bewegt
< sah. Die eiligen Beschäftigungen der Nächsten ließen sich erkennen: man
< verlängerte, man verkürzte die Steigbügel, man reichte sich Büchse und
< Patrontäschchen, man schob die Dachsranzen zurecht, indes die Hunde ungeduldig
< am Riemen den Zurückhaltenden mit fortzuschleppen drohten. Auch hie und da
---
> lichtenden Schleier die Regentropfen. Ganz als ob mit Göthe die Beschreibung über die Regentropfen zuträfe, über das, womit Regentropfen sich so rumschlagen tagsüber: die ganze Jägerei zu Pferde und zu Fuß durcheinander bewegt sah. Die eiligen Beschäftigungen der Nächsten ließen sich erkennen: man verlängerte, man verkürzte die Steigbügel, man reichte sich Büchse und Patrontäschchen, man schob die Dachsranzen zurecht, indes die Hunde ungeduldig am Riemen den Zurückhaltenden mit fortzuschleppen drohten. Auch hie und da
12,13c19,20
< Eitelkeit, sich zu zeigen, nicht verleugnen konnte. Alle jedoch warteten auf
< den Fürsten, der, von seiner jungen Gemahlin Abschied nehmend, allzulange
---
> Eitelkeit, sich zu zeigen, nicht verleugnen konnte. Alle die Regentropfen jedoch warteten auf
> den Fürsten, der, von seiner jungen Gemahlin, der Fürstin, Abschied nehmend, allzulange
25c32
< Pferde geführt und sie bemerken lassen, wie gerade hier das Gebirgsland mit dem
---
> Drahtesel geführt und sie bemerken lassen, wie gerade hier das Gebirgsland mit dem
32c39
< widerstehen, an diesen günstigen Herbsttagen eine schon verschobene Jagd zu
---
> widerstehen, an diesen günstigen Herbsttagen eine schon verschobene Jagd, d.h. den Besuch eines Fußballspiels zu
38c45
< Scheidend versäumte der Gemahl nicht, einen Spazierritt vorzuschlagen, den sie
---
> Scheidend versäumte der Gemahl Fürst nicht, einen Spazierfahrt vorzuschlagen, den sie
41,43c48
< sorgen wird.« Und im Gefolg dieser Worte gab er im Hinabsteigen einem
< wohlgebildeten jungen Mann die nötigen Aufträge, verschwand sodann bald mit
< Gästen und Gefolge.
---
> sorgen wird.« Und im Gefolg dieser Worte nahm er den Regenschirm verschwand sodann im Regen.
124,125c129,130
< Honorio trat ein und meldete, die Pferde seien vorgeführt; da sagte die
< Fürstin, zum Oheim gewendet: »Reiten wir hinauf, und lassen Sie mich in der
---
> Honorio trat ein und meldete, die Drahtesel seien vorgeführt; da sagte die
> Fürstin, zum Oheim gewendet: »Radeln wir hinauf, und lassen Sie mich in der
132c137
< schämen soll.« – »Und so reiten wir wenigstens hinaufwärts, und wär es nur bis
---
> schämen soll.« – »Und so radeln wir wenigstens hinaufwärts, und wär es nur bis
135c140
< Stadt reiten,« fuhr die Dame fort, »über den großen Marktplatz, wo eine
---
> Stadt radeln,« fuhr die Dame fort, »über den großen Marktplatz, wo eine
150c155
< Amazon.de_Widgets
---
> 
155,156c160
< Verzeihen Sie aber, meine Beste, ich reite niemals gern durch den Markt und
< Messe; bei jedem Schritt ist man gehindert und aufgehalten, und dann flammt mir
---
> Verzeihen Sie aber, meine Beste, ich radle niemals gern durch den Markt; bei jedem Schritt ist man gehindert und aufgehalten, und dann flammt mir
166c170
< Die Fürstin eilte, das Lieblingspferd zu besteigen, und führte, statt zum
---
> Die Fürstin eilte, den Lieblingsdrahtesel zu besteigen, und führte, statt zum
171c175
< Wie vorauszusehen, durften sie auf dem Markte nur Schritt vor Schritt reiten;
---
> Wie vorauszusehen, durften sie auf dem Markte nur Schritt vor Schritt radeln;
175,177c179,180
< sich die ganze Menschenmasse dergestalt an die Reitenden heran, daß sie ihren
< Weg nur langsam fortsetzen konnten. Das Volk schaute mit Freuden die junge
< Dame, und auf so viel lächelnden Gesichtern zeigte sich das entschiedene
---
> sich die ganze Regentropfenmasse dergestalt an die Radelnden heran, daß sie ihren
> Weg nur langsam fortsetzen konnten. Die ganze Regentropfenmasse schaute, als ob sie mit Göthe das Volk wäre, mit Freuden die junge Dame, und auf so viel lächelnden Gesichtern zeigte sich das entschiedene
180c183
< Untereinander gemischt standen Bergbewohner, die zwischen Felsen, Fichten und
---
> Untereinander gemischt standen Bergbewohner unter den Regentropfen, die zwischen Felsen, Fichten und
182c185
< her, Gewerbsleute der kleinen Städte, und was sich alles versammelt hatte. Nach
---
> her, Regentropfen-Gewerbsleute der kleinen Städte, und was sich alles versammelt hatte. Nach
190c193
< So waren sie nach und nach auf einen freiern Platz gelangt, der zur Vorstadt
---
> So waren sie nach und nach auf einen freien Platz gelangt, der zur Vorstadt
195c198
< und Wüstenstimme aufs kräftigste hören, die Pferde schauderten, und man konnte
---
> und Wüstenstimme aufs kräftigste hören, die Drahtesel schauderten, und man konnte
238c241
< nach einer weitern, weniger begrenzten Aussicht, ritten sie eine steinige,
---
> nach einer weitern, weniger begrenzten Aussicht, radelten sie eine steinige,
240c243
< entgegenstand, wenig alte Bäume tief unten um seinen Fuß; sie ritten hindurch,
---
> entgegenstand, wenig alte Bäume tief unten um seinen Fuß; sie radelten hindurch,
249c252
< gefallen und wollte sich doch auch nicht unkräftig zeigen; die Pferde sollten
---
> gefallen und wollte sich doch auch nicht unkräftig zeigen; die Drahtesel sollten
280c283
< zweiten Male zu erleben.« Als sie, herabgekommen, den Pferden wieder zugingen,
---
> zweiten Male zu erleben.« Als sie, herabgekommen, den Drahteseln wieder zugingen,
282,283c285,286
< ohne den Reitknecht! Lassen Sie mir Honorio! Wir folgen sogleich.« Der Oheim
< fühlte das Vernünftige, ja das Notwendige dieser Worte und ritt, so eilig als
---
> durch den Regen! Lassen Sie mir Honorio! Wir folgen sogleich.« Der Oheim
> fühlte das Vernünftige, ja das Notwendige dieser Worte und radelte, so eilig als
285c288
< Als die Fürstin aufsaß, sagte Honorio: »Reiten Euer Durchlaucht, ich bitte,
---
> Als die Fürstin aufsaß, sagte Honorio: »Radelt Euer Durchlaucht, ich bitte,
289c292
< Gras, schnelles Reiten ist unsicher; ohnehin, bis wir hineinkommen, wird das
---
> Gras, schnelles Radeln ist unsicher; ohnehin, bis wir hineinkommen, wird das
294c297
< erlebten Jahrmarktsbrande leider nur zu tief eingesenkt hatte.[500]
---
> erlebten Jahrmarktsbrande leider nur zu tief eingesenkt hatte.
310c313
< Diener und Knechte mit den Herren bemühten sich, von Flammen ergriffene Ballen
---
> Bedienstete und Privatleute bemühten sich, von Flammen ergriffene Ballen
323c326
< sie kaum einige Schritte von der[501] lebhaften Quelle des nahen fließenden
---
> sie kaum einige Schritte von der lebhaften Quelle des nahen fließenden
331c334
< Leider jedoch war gefehlt; der Tiger sprang seitwärts, das Pferd stutzte, das
---
> Leider jedoch war gefehlt; der Tiger sprang seitwärts, der Drahtesel stutzte, das
333,335c336,338
< nach. Sie sprengte, was das Pferd vermochte, die steile, steinige Strecke
< hinan, kaum fürchtend, daß ein zartes Geschöpf, solcher Anstrengung ungewohnt,
< sie nicht aushalten werde. Es übernahm sich, von der bedrängten Reiterin
---
> nach. Sie sprengte, was der Drahtesel vermochte, die steile, steinige Strecke
> hinan, kaum fürchtend, daß ein zartes Geschöpf wie der Drahtesel, solcher Anstrengung ungewohnt,
> sie nicht aushalten werde. Es übernahm sich, von der bedrängten Radlerin
338,339c341,342
< entschlossen und gewandt, verfehlte nicht, sich strack auf ihre Füße zu
< stellen, auch das Pferd richtete sich auf, aber der Tiger nahte schon, obgleich
---
> entschlossen und gewandt, verfehlte nicht, sich stracks auf ihre Füße zu
> stellen, auch der Drahtesel richtete sich auf, aber der Tiger nahte schon, obgleich
343c346
< reizen. Beide Renner erreichten zugleich den Ort, wo die Fürstin am Pferde
---
> reizen. Beide Renner erreichten zugleich den Ort, wo die Fürstin am Drahtesel
351,352c354,355
< hatte. Ebenso traf in der Reitbahn seine Kugel im Vorbeisprengen den Türkenkopf
< auf dem Pfahl gerade unter dem Turban in die Stirne, ebenso spießte er,[502]
---
> hatte. Ebenso traf in der Radelbahn seine Kugel im Vorbeisprengen den Türkenkopf
> auf dem Pfahl gerade unter dem Turban in die Stirne, ebenso spießte er,
383c386
< Überzeugung meines Gemahls irgend etwas[503] wünschen und bitten; allein wenn
---
> Überzeugung meines Gemahls irgend etwas wünschen und bitten; allein wenn
412c415
< doch spielend dein Futter aus den Händen einer Frau, von den Fingern[504] eines
---
> doch spielend dein Futter aus den Händen einer Frau, von den Fingern eines
418c421
< herab Reiter heransprengten, die alsobald für das Jagdgefolge des Fürsten
---
> herab Regentropfen heransprengten, die alsobald für das Jagdgefolge des Fürsten
424,427c427
< merkwürdig auszeichnete. Nach dem ersten Erkennen verstummte man, und nach
< einigem Erholen ward, was der Anblick nicht selbst ergab, mit wenigen Worten
< erläutert. So stand der Fürst vor dem seltsamen, unerhörten Ereignis, einen
< Kreis umher von Reitern und Nacheilenden zu Fuße. Unschlüssig war man nicht,
---
> merkwürdig auszeichnete. So stand der Fürst im Regen; unschlüssig war man nicht,
437c437
< links hinauf, aber ich sah den großen Trupp Menschen und Pferde vor mir,
---
> links hinauf, aber ich sah den Trupp Menschen und Drahtesel vor mir,
439c439
< »muß die Jagd sich auf diese Seite ziehen; ihr ladet eure Gewehre, geht sachte
---
> »muß die Jagd sich auf diese Seite ziehen; geht sachte
442c442
< ihr unvorsichtig genug, sie[505] entkommen zu lassen!« – »Das Feuer brach aus,«
---
> ihr unvorsichtig genug, sie entkommen zu lassen!« – »Das Feuer brach aus,«
454,457c454
< sich ganz ruhig. Ärgerlich aber schloß der Mann: »Warum habe ich gestern meine
< Büchse in die Stadt getragen, um sie ausputzen zu lassen! Hätte ich sie bei der
< Hand gehabt, er wäre nicht wieder aufgestanden, das Fell wäre doch mein
< gewesen, und ich hätte mich dessen, wie billig, zeitlebens gebrüstet.«
---
> sich ganz ruhig. 
472c469
< Seiten vermauert, von[506] jeher der einzige Zugang war und der einzige bleiben
---
> Seiten vermauert, von jeher der einzige Zugang war und der einzige bleiben
477c474
< sanft gleichsam zu präludieren fortgefahren hatte, wendete er sich zu Honorio
---
> sanft gleichsam zu vorspielen fortgefahren hatte, wendete er sich zu Honorio
479c476
< schmalen Weg! – Haltet eure Büchsen bereit, aber schießt nicht eher, als bis
---
> schmalen Weg! – Schießt nicht eher, als bis
501c498
< waagerecht, als Meister und Geselle. Schaut die Ameise[507] da! sie kennt ihren
---
> waagerecht, als Meister und Geselle. Schaut die Ameise da! sie kennt ihren
508,509c505,509
< trage, wohin er will, und die Frau, wohin sie begehrt. Aber im Palmenwald trat
< er auf, der Löwe, ernsten Schrittes durchzog er die Wüste, dort herrscht er
---
> trage, wohin er will, und die Frau, wohin sie begehrt. 
> Denn den unzivilisierten Räubern, den unversöhnlichen, von denen ein jeder der Meinen auch mal einer war oder noch ist, soll ganz recht ebenso schroff verfahren werden, wie einem Ameisenhaufen von einem scharrenden Pferd. „Zero Toleranz“ mit denen oder uns, sagte man heute. Ihrer barbarischen Art entweicht die tödliche Gewalt aber leider doch. Unbezähmt und verrückt trifft sie das erste beste Tier - zur Probe des Menschenschutzes gottlob und leider doch eins ums andere mal. Nun denn!
> Betreten wir beide hier und heute den vorgezeichneten Weg in eine diesjährige Versöhnung nämlich aus nicht weniger als dem Tierschutz! Ein Lob dem Menschenschutz überm Tierschutz - ist wahr. 
> 
> Aber im Palmenwald trat er auf, der Löwe, ernsten Schrittes durchzog er die Wüste, dort herrscht er
530d529
< Amazon.de_Widgets
537d535
< [508]
569c567
< Durch einen Wink, die Pferde näher herbeizuführen, brachte der Fürst zuerst
---
> Durch einen Wink, die Drahtesel näher herbeizuführen, brachte der Fürst zuerst
574c572
< Verschluß[509] wieder zurückbringen könntet?« Sie bejahten es, versichern und
---
> Verschluß wieder zurückbringen könntet?« Sie bejahten es, versichern und
583,584c581
< Weiter hin, auf einem Mauerstücke sitzend, erblickten sie Honorio, seine
< Doppelbüchse in den Schoß gelegt, auf einem Posten als wie zu jedem Ereignis
---
> Weiter hin, auf einem Mauerstücke sitzend, erblickten sie Honorio, auf einem Posten als wie zu jedem Ereignis
603c600
< Kind hinein, so[510] kann ich die Öffnung mit leichte Mühe schließen, und der
---
> Kind hinein, so kann ich die Öffnung mit leichter Mühe schließen, und der

#FAQ whic replacement best practices are there?
#1.You could use an easiest replacement as an combination from original with an arbitrary name, so you meet the grammar, that is sex, number, case requirements almost true, the user word could stem well randomly from a dictionary. 
#Feature: So by a 20 characters you got a 100000 dict entries ^20, a 10^26 possible copies enough for a 150.000 copies give out an industry, a requirement, deems I.
#2. There are proposals given of wariables to relabel: the characters. And you got given a default list, see demos.

#Usage case:
#arbitrary dictionary words as character labels

#Usage case:
#diy change Story: that is easy and called patching

#Features:
#1.support german grammar, till than you needed to correct manually, tbi
#2.support partial dictionaries, e.g. entries out of biological faculty of dictionary tbi
#3.Function: Get you copy of an self designed do-not-wonder real arts piece of a Novelle, a perfect birthday present, at your finger tips.
#4 costumizable random labeling out of parts of dictionary: fancy arts a fetish, a birthday present; what speaks against to be chased by a stool, as long as grammatically correct, asks I? tbi
#5 cli: for 1 to 150000 do sophokleskroisos.sh -random biodict -grammar sensitive -character kind,kindhubert -character mutter,mater -patch mypatch -to mynovelle.txt tbi

#Demo
#: match regex keywords for user manipulation. You could for a most primitive example change a any of this Kind into Kind-Hubert.
#keywords
a='[Ff]ürst[^A-Za-z] [Ff]ürsten[^A-Za-z] [Ff]ürstin Regentropfen Regenschirm Regen Fürsten.Vater [dD]rahtesel Finanzminister Landjägermeister Friedrich Honorio Stall-.und.Hofjunker Oberstallmeister Zeichner Wächter Wärtel Fürst.Oheim radeln Markt Mann Frau Kind Tiger Löw Löwin Oheim Familie.zusammen [tT]ier'

for midi in $a; do echo -n " $midi "; cat Novelle_enhanced.txt|grep "$midi"|wc -l; done;
 [Ff]ürst[^A-Za-z] 24
 [Ff]ürsten[^A-Za-z] 7
 [Ff]ürstin 25
 Regentropfen 7
 Regenschirm 1
 Regen 10
 Fürsten.Vater 1
 [dD]rahtesel 13
 Finanzminister 2
 Landjägermeister 1
 Friedrich 3
 Honorio 17
 Stall-.und.Hofjunker 1
 Oberstallmeister 1
 Zeichner 2
 Wächter 3
 Wärtel 7
 Fürst.Oheim 2
 radeln 3
 Markt 9
 Mann 11
 Frau 13
 Kind 22
 Tiger 8
 Löw 20
 Löwin 2
 Oheim 9
 Familie.zusammen 1
 [tT]ier 20



#Have fun!
#Licence: gnu https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regul%C3%A4rer_Ausdruck, name: sophokles kroisos

 

Update feature release Nosette

date
Fr 21. Sep 15:00:48 CEST 2018
###Nosettengeneration Demo 
#Variation 1:
a412="und noch dabeizubleiben heißen 
und nicht nicht immer nur darüber hinaus" 

#or variation 2:
a412="Lenore’ns Herz, mit Beben,
Rang zwischen Tod und Leben."


echo "
Nosette

1.1-4
Nosette, Nosette was ich davon hätte
Wie viel Schlampe Sprecher bezahlen,
eine Novelle als Sonett
wenn sie zehnfach bezahlen

2.1-4
Leg ne Vornovelle auf
"Arbeit ist Scheiße" vorm Heid, (I) 
Schon folgt der Druck am Knopfe
der Kunstfigürlichkeit. (II)

3.1-4
Im Kopfe? - Theohebdoische Schöne,
Oh, Sonettenzweck kann es dich geben?
Die Geisterfahrer jagen Führerscheine, 
Szene, sensationeller Prominenz überleben

4.1-?
$a412
..
Da läuft er ja der Tiger!


5.1-2
Der wird zum Katzenfelle nutzen
und Löwenschutze (Tierschutzen).

(I) (MK7,1-19)
(Aph. Kunstfigur, Minima Moralia) (II)
"